- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Question about Lindell's data
Posted on 4/4/21 at 10:31 pm
Posted on 4/4/21 at 10:31 pm
Just watched the video he dropped with the psychologist. Very convincing stuff. But before I spread for and wide, need to prepare for the debunkers.
Algorithms and this level of advanced data analysis is not easy for the average American to digest. Most people aren't and won't get it, how does the data that was presented show up as an actual receipt of proof. Just watching the video, how do I know where those graphs and data come from and can prove that information is real?
Algorithms and this level of advanced data analysis is not easy for the average American to digest. Most people aren't and won't get it, how does the data that was presented show up as an actual receipt of proof. Just watching the video, how do I know where those graphs and data come from and can prove that information is real?
9
Posted on 4/4/21 at 10:49 pm to burger bearcat
I hear the word algorithm, and now I always think of Dr. Zola, from Captain America.
Posted on 4/4/21 at 10:55 pm to burger bearcat
quote:
how do I know where those graphs and data come from and can prove that information is real?
You can’t. Once upon a time you could rely on the media to cover a story like this. They had a spin, but they wouldn’t cover up something this large.
Now we know that they would, so there’s no way to know what’s true and what isn’t unless you have objective source documents. And I think we’re nearing a time when people will ignore those and call them deep fakes or “debunked”.
Posted on 4/4/21 at 11:03 pm to AURaptor
quote:
I hear the word algorithm, and now I always think of Dr. Zola, from Captain America.
I hear the word algorithm and think why the heck does an algorithm even exist for any reason on a voting machine.
Posted on 4/4/21 at 11:10 pm to FatBoy62
quote:
I hear the word algorithm and think why the heck does an algorithm even exist for any reason on a voting machine.
true, and I seem to remember 1/2 vote shares being shifted around. How do you get a 1/2 vote (unless its an algorithm math issue resulting from 115% or the total votes electronically going Biden and 85% of total votes electronically counting for Trump)...
Posted on 4/5/21 at 12:16 am to burger bearcat
Well for starters, I'd like to know if his data is factual because if it is then it is a complete impossibility that this occurred naturally. Basically he claims that in every county in Ohio the percentage of people that were registered to vote vs those that actually showed up to cast a ballot were identical in every county in the state. Furthermore, he claims that the proportion of voting age residents to registered voters to ballots received in Ohio was exactly the same in every single county. If that is true then it is impossible to ignore that kind of irregularity.
Posted on 4/5/21 at 1:19 am to sabanisarustedspoke
quote:
If that is true then it is impossible to ignore that kind of irregularity.
They seem to be ignoring it just fine.
Posted on 4/5/21 at 2:11 am to burger bearcat
quote:
Just watching the video, how do I know where those graphs and data come from and can prove that information is real?
Watch the video again. He is a physicist, not a psychologist. In the video, he explains where he got the data - most states have it available, publicly. It's not that difficult to do - get the data, follow the information in the video, and use Excel.
Posted on 4/5/21 at 4:06 am to FatBoy62
quote:
I hear the word algorithm and think why the heck does an algorithm even exist for any reason on a voting machine.
Algorithms are just instructions for the computers to follow. Your laptop or tablet use them in everything they do. Its a fancy word that isn't that fancy.
Posted on 4/5/21 at 5:18 am to CDawson
quote:
Algorithms are just instructions for the computers to follow. Your laptop or tablet use them in everything they do. Its a fancy word that isn't that fancy.
I like how it was described in the video as like "recipe". Algorithms are simply sets of instructions for the computer to follow.
This post was edited on 4/5/21 at 5:19 am
Posted on 4/5/21 at 8:51 am to sabanisarustedspoke
quote:
Well for starters, I'd like to know if his data is factual because if it is then it is a complete impossibility that this occurred naturally. Basically he claims that in every county in Ohio the percentage of people that were registered to vote vs those that actually showed up to cast a ballot were identical in every county in the state.
I just downloaded the participation data from the Ohio Sec of state. And there is no truth to the statement that "every county in Ohio the percentage of people that were registered to vote vs those that actually showed up to cast a ballot were identical in every county."
Seriously just go here and check for yourself: LINK
Now I did not watch the original video so I am going off your representation of the original claim.
But why would they manipulate the returns in a state that Trump won by 8% points?
Posted on 4/5/21 at 8:54 am to burger bearcat
quote:
Just watched the video he dropped with the psychologist. Very convincing stuff.
It's only successful if it makes you want to purchase a crappy overpriced pillow.
Posted on 4/5/21 at 9:01 am to BigJim
quote:
But why would they manipulate the returns in a state that Trump won by 8% points?
The most effective liars are those who obscure the truth 100% of the time, even when it is unnecessary.
Posted on 4/5/21 at 9:05 am to BigJim
quote:
But why would they manipulate the returns in a state that Trump won by 8% points?
There's a lot of plausible explanations for this.
Posted on 4/5/21 at 9:21 am to FatBoy62
quote:
why the heck does an algorithm even exist for any reason on a voting machine.
Even more to the point - anything a machine does other than add and format results should not exist in any 'voting machine'
IF we're going to have to wait a couple of weeks to find out the eventual output from all the 'voting machines' anyway, I'm all in favor of dumping them all and going back to the days of manually counting actual paper ballots with a verified signature on them and tallying up the results with manual Frieden adding machines ala 1950. Then have an independent operation going to duplicate the result with a resolution count for any disparity greater than x %. (x tbd approx ~ .1 %)
Posted on 4/5/21 at 9:24 am to burger bearcat
quote:
Just watched the video he dropped with the psychologist.
Can you post the video?
Posted on 4/5/21 at 10:08 am to moneyg
quote:
There's a lot of plausible explanations for this.
What’s the plausible explanation for the fact that the actual data from Ohio does not support what the physicist in the video is claiming? This data is available for anyone to look at, and is pretty simple to understand, but I guess people don’t want to do their own research if the result will not support what they want to believe.
Posted on 4/5/21 at 10:28 am to AURaptor
quote:
I hear the word algorithm
...an immediately a former Vice President and global warming guru's appearance on Dancing With The Stars comes into view.
Posted on 4/5/21 at 10:30 am to tarzana
Algorithm n blues
Posted on 4/5/21 at 10:32 am to burger bearcat
No need to watch Lindell's video.
Algorithms and charts and fancy statistics do not prove anything.
That said, they point to a problem! Statistical evidence is not legal evidence at all, but it points investigators in the right direction. So, Mike Lindell's not presented any provable facts, but he has presented the same type evidence that showed that Trump actually won.
How many court cases were tossed because Democrats invented voters out of whole cloth who lived in parking garages or vacant lots? Plenty. But the judge ruled that because anecdotal evidence was not sufficient to prove fraud, Democrat cheating bastards have the advantage right now.
Algorithms and charts and fancy statistics do not prove anything.
That said, they point to a problem! Statistical evidence is not legal evidence at all, but it points investigators in the right direction. So, Mike Lindell's not presented any provable facts, but he has presented the same type evidence that showed that Trump actually won.
How many court cases were tossed because Democrats invented voters out of whole cloth who lived in parking garages or vacant lots? Plenty. But the judge ruled that because anecdotal evidence was not sufficient to prove fraud, Democrat cheating bastards have the advantage right now.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News