- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
What should we actually expect from the title IX report tomorrow and the consequences?
Posted on 3/4/21 at 4:51 pm
Posted on 3/4/21 at 4:51 pm
Best case: nothing.
Worst case (depends who you ask): coaching changes and post season bans?
Worst case (depends who you ask): coaching changes and post season bans?
This post was edited on 3/4/21 at 4:54 pm
Posted on 3/4/21 at 4:54 pm to irishTiger18
This post was edited on 3/4/21 at 4:57 pm
Posted on 3/4/21 at 4:59 pm to irishTiger18
Trying to put bits and pieces together from a multiple of released reports, afraid it will not be pretty.
Posted on 3/4/21 at 5:30 pm to irishTiger18
My wife just asked if we’re finally going to see if the naked pics of les miles Jordan Jefferson kept back in 2011 will be released now.
Posted on 3/4/21 at 5:35 pm to irishTiger18
It’s not going to be nothing
But I don’t think it will be the worst case scenario either
But I don’t think it will be the worst case scenario either
Posted on 3/4/21 at 5:45 pm to irishTiger18
There were things that happened which were wrong and there will be appropriate consequences, including terminations.
However, as proven by the release of the Miles article today, it will be far from “over”. There is an agenda at behind this and a reason why LSU has been targeted.
LSU is not a “victim” here - the Davis situation is beyond troubling with Guice right behind. There is punishment deserved. Those stories are terrible and needed to come to light and be reported. But why the need to try to pump them up by exaggerating and misrepresenting other incidents?
Again, LSU is not a victim, but is subject to “selective prosecution” by USA Today. Someone knew who would be sympathetic and put these reporters on this track and supplied them with enough info to get started. That someone knew of a few former coaches and others that had an axe to grind, and it went from there.
Ask yourself about the piece on Miles and if you can think of another current SEC head coach who has a far worse and well earned reputation. Heck, he even boned his boss’s daughter a couple of jobs ago and threw it in the guys face.
However, as proven by the release of the Miles article today, it will be far from “over”. There is an agenda at behind this and a reason why LSU has been targeted.
LSU is not a “victim” here - the Davis situation is beyond troubling with Guice right behind. There is punishment deserved. Those stories are terrible and needed to come to light and be reported. But why the need to try to pump them up by exaggerating and misrepresenting other incidents?
Again, LSU is not a victim, but is subject to “selective prosecution” by USA Today. Someone knew who would be sympathetic and put these reporters on this track and supplied them with enough info to get started. That someone knew of a few former coaches and others that had an axe to grind, and it went from there.
Ask yourself about the piece on Miles and if you can think of another current SEC head coach who has a far worse and well earned reputation. Heck, he even boned his boss’s daughter a couple of jobs ago and threw it in the guys face.
Posted on 3/4/21 at 5:56 pm to lsusa
quote:
Ask yourself about the piece on Miles and if you can think of another current SEC head coach who has a far worse and well earned reputation. Heck, he even boned his boss’s daughter a couple of jobs ago and threw it in the guys face.
Joey Freshwater? I heard the rumors but my guess is if it really happened he wouldn't be coaching in the SEC. ight be wrong but his boss clearly swings a big enough club.
We might not be a victim in the other stuff but this entire thing just reeks. I've done my best to avoid reading about it but it's been hard. I can't believe that rag USA Today could wield enough journalistic power to bring this to a head. I'm sure whatever we end up getting is going to piss many of us off.
Posted on 3/4/21 at 6:02 pm to irishTiger18
Does anyone have any real ideas of what could happen?
Loss of x more Schollys? Ed O gets fired? Is this more of an LSU compliance issue or a LSU football program issue?
Loss of x more Schollys? Ed O gets fired? Is this more of an LSU compliance issue or a LSU football program issue?
Posted on 3/4/21 at 6:13 pm to Syntax
quote:
ight be wrong
Ahh... the spelling Faux Pas turned perfect Saban reference
Well done
This post was edited on 3/4/21 at 6:14 pm
Posted on 3/4/21 at 6:13 pm to irishTiger18
quote:
LSU PLAYER FILES COMPLAINT AFTER YEAR-LONG SUSPENSION FOR TITLE IX VIOLATION
By Adam Rittenberg, ESPN
An LSU football player suspended for a Title IX violation filed a complaint against the university Thursday, alleging it made an “unjust and discriminatory decision… following a biased, flawed, confusing and unlawful process.”
The player, who is not identified in the complaint, in March was found responsible for the violation, which alleges that he engaged in nonconsensual sexual intercourse with a female LSU student. In May, LSU suspended the player for a year.
The complaint asks for LSU’s decision to be vacated and for the player to be reinstated to the school’s football team on a full athletic scholarship.
An LSU spokesman said the school cannot comment on pending litigation.
According to the complaint, filed in U.S. District Court, the suspended LSU player met a female student at a bar near campus on the night of Jan. 23. The player asked the female student if she wanted to have sex and she agreed. Afterward, he accompanied her to her dorm, where the two parted ways, the complaint states.
Attorneys for the suspended LSU player say the school did not provide the player an opportunity to have a hearing or review evidence or witnesses against him before concluding its investigation March 6. The complaint states that Jeffrey Scott, LSU’s lead Title IX investigator, failed to inform the player that both the university and Baton Rouge police departments were contacted about the incident and did not respond to several voicemails asking for status updates about the investigation before its conclusion.
“LSU has a very confusing policy where you have to jump through a number of hoops before you’re even allowed for a hearing,” said Susan Stone, one of the attorneys representing the suspended player. “If they find you responsible, then you get an appeal process, and only then, when two, three different layers find you responsible, do you have a hearing. So you’re already stigmatized as being responsible before you’ve had an opportunity to confront or cross-examine your accuser. How is that fair?”
Posted on 3/4/21 at 6:15 pm to irishTiger18
there was a lot of talk around BTR that the LSU HR and Compliance Depts had enough evidence to terminate people before the outside lawyers got involved and did their investigation.
so we’ll see what happens
so we’ll see what happens
Posted on 3/4/21 at 7:21 pm to supatigah
Slap on the wrist, let's move on.
Posted on 3/4/21 at 7:45 pm to supatigah
If that's true and compliance elected not to terminate, compliance needs to be gutted.
Posted on 3/4/21 at 8:00 pm to irishTiger18
Lower level and ex employees get the blame. I am guessing more dirt on miles.
Posted on 3/4/21 at 8:01 pm to DRock88
quote:
compliance needs to be gutted.
Every LSU fan rejoices!!!!
Posted on 3/4/21 at 8:07 pm to jmon
Hope LSU gets rid of that whole useless compliance office.
Posted on 3/4/21 at 8:14 pm to irishTiger18
Our compliance department drops the hammer for weed and looks the other way when potential title IX stuff comes their way. What a joke.
This post was edited on 3/4/21 at 8:53 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News