- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Hard no on Barbara Lagoa
Posted on 9/20/20 at 5:00 pm
Posted on 9/20/20 at 5:00 pm
This post was edited on 9/20/20 at 5:00 pm
37
Posted on 9/20/20 at 5:01 pm to GEAUXmedic
Good thing it’s not up to you.
Posted on 9/20/20 at 5:01 pm to GEAUXmedic
So she is an abortion loving POS ! 
Posted on 9/20/20 at 5:02 pm to GEAUXmedic
What are her thought on 2-A?
That is all that will determine a hard no for me.
That is all that will determine a hard no for me.
Posted on 9/20/20 at 5:02 pm to GEAUXmedic
The right has got to let abortion GO.
Posted on 9/20/20 at 5:03 pm to GEAUXmedic
The FAKE CONSERVATIVES/REPUBLICANS filth on this board are going to attack you on this !
Posted on 9/20/20 at 5:03 pm to GEAUXmedic
That doesn't mean that she would not agree with placing onerous limits on it. The elimination of RvW is not going to happen but there are limits that must be put in place (limit to 1st trimester, etc...)
Posted on 9/20/20 at 5:03 pm to GEAUXmedic
On the plus side:
-her parents are direct from Cuba and moved the family to USA to flee from Castro's communist regime.
-she's a Federalist Society memeber
-her parents are direct from Cuba and moved the family to USA to flee from Castro's communist regime.
-she's a Federalist Society memeber
Posted on 9/20/20 at 5:03 pm to GEAUXmedic
There are legal ways to erode Roe v. Wade without completely overturning it.
Posted on 9/20/20 at 5:04 pm to GEAUXmedic
That's probably why she gets picked to get through
ACB n Pryor replace the next 2
ACB n Pryor replace the next 2
This post was edited on 9/20/20 at 5:04 pm
Posted on 9/20/20 at 5:09 pm to GEAUXmedic
I think her responses are typical. In fact I think Kav made similar responses.
Roe v Wade is the law of the land right now.
Posted on 9/20/20 at 5:10 pm to GEAUXmedic
She's a Souter but I'm confident Daddy will pick Amy.
Posted on 9/20/20 at 5:11 pm to GEAUXmedic
What’s her Bush connections?
Posted on 9/20/20 at 5:11 pm to GEAUXmedic
This is the right answer for all intermediate court of appeals. Supreme Court is binding law. We should celebrate that. Her answer may not be the same as a justice.
Posted on 9/20/20 at 5:13 pm to GEAUXmedic
OP, you are reading her answer wrong.
She is saying Roe v Wade is binding precedent for the Circuit court for which she was being appointed for, which is correct.
That doesn't mean she would or wouldn't overturn it while on the Supreme Court.
She is saying Roe v Wade is binding precedent for the Circuit court for which she was being appointed for, which is correct.
That doesn't mean she would or wouldn't overturn it while on the Supreme Court.
Posted on 9/20/20 at 5:18 pm to GEAUXmedic
Are those questions from when she was appointed to a judgeship? For a lower court, that is the correct answer, not the Supreme Court though.
Posted on 9/20/20 at 5:22 pm to GEAUXmedic
Repubs are scared because no one wants roe gone. There will have to be some clever maneuvering here.
Posted on 9/20/20 at 5:22 pm to GEAUXmedic
You are misreading this completely. She is saying that as a Federal Court judge, she would faithfully follow decided SC precedent. As a conservative should.
As a Justice, she would not be bound by this.
As a Justice, she would not be bound by this.
This post was edited on 9/20/20 at 5:23 pm
Posted on 9/20/20 at 5:23 pm to GEAUXmedic
What else would you expect her to say under questioning for a lower court judgeship?
"I won't follow the precedent set by the Supreme Court when I hear cases in my lower court position. I will use my lower court position to overrule the Supreme Court's decision."
If she's on the Supreme Court THEN she can use her position to overturn a previous SC decision.
Dumb.
"I won't follow the precedent set by the Supreme Court when I hear cases in my lower court position. I will use my lower court position to overrule the Supreme Court's decision."
If she's on the Supreme Court THEN she can use her position to overturn a previous SC decision.
Dumb.
Posted on 9/20/20 at 5:40 pm to GEAUXmedic
did you miss the ",for lower court justices" caveat?
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News