- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 7/26/20 at 9:04 pm to SUB
quote:
Article With Details From APB
And I very much thank you for the very informative link SUB. You’re a goddamn good TD poster and an even better american.
Posted on 7/26/20 at 9:18 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
quote:
Let’s see exactly how retarded... I mean intelligent you are when it’s all said and done.
If you don't know who shot first you honestly aren't worth the time discussing this with.
Hey... did they ever say who shot first... I’m waiting
Posted on 7/26/20 at 9:20 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:
Any retard that watched the videos knows who shot first. I guess you wouldn't like me on a jury since I'm intelligent.
Hey bud give the Austin PD a call. They need a retard to tell them who shot first!
Posted on 7/26/20 at 9:21 pm to Jcorye1
quote:
I'm not expert, but it's painfully obvious the larger gun with the bigger round is louder. Now you can argue the motorist has a deadly weapon (vehicle) but it's open and shut who shot first. Hell they just have to check the magazines assuming both were fully loaded.
Woof I was wrong on that count.
Posted on 7/26/20 at 9:37 pm to Ghost of Colby
quote:
What’s the legal justification for the second shooter being released? The driver was no longer a threat if he was fleeing.
I agree, the driver was no longer a threat. This other person will have to face consequences. Since they have a CC it is highly unlikely they will "flee" and the police can always pick them up later.
Who knows. All we know is, pointing guns at people is a bad idea.
edit to add: If someone in the vehicle did fired those 5 rounds first, it is a miracle they didn't hit anyone else.
This post was edited on 7/26/20 at 9:39 pm
Posted on 7/26/20 at 9:49 pm to sdc74
quote:
Hey... did they ever say who shot first... I’m waiting
You know it doesn't matter, right? You can't just go around pointing a rifle at people, especially in a situation like that.
Posted on 7/26/20 at 9:51 pm to dukke v
quote:
that wanna be tough coo killed a black man and the whole country saw it
You didn't even read the coroner's report, did you? Chauvin had almost nothing to do with Floyd's death. I know in modern American society inconvenient facts are inconvenient. But if you read the report you'd know Floyd was going to be dead before Chauvin ever touched him. But that doesn't give us a chance to get all up in our feels and proclaim to everyone on the internet. So we'll just blatantly ignore the facts (also, btw, that MPD's policy supported the officer's action) and proclaim our virtue to the world how it was awful what that stormtrooper did to that innocent angel.
Now, I have no doubt the officer will get convicted. His trial will have all the legitimacy of a drumhead tribunal. But he'll pay the price to assauge the mob's demand for blood.
Posted on 7/26/20 at 10:26 pm to SUB
quote:This person should be brought up on charges. Those shots were not fired for fear of life or loss of property. He had no legit reason to fire shots at that vehicle.
After the first volley of gunfire, another individual reported hearing the shots and saw the vehicle driving away. This person then drew their concealed handgun from an ankle holster and fired multiple shots at the vehicle as it drove away.
Posted on 7/26/20 at 10:29 pm to MoarKilometers
Listen for when the screams begin. That tells the story. You hear a male voice say "everyone back!" and then five loud shots, followed by relative silence. Seconds later, three more (lighter sounding) shots followed immediately by ear-piercing female screams. Must have been someone they know.
Posted on 7/26/20 at 10:31 pm to 62Tigerfan
quote:
followed immediately by ear-piercing female screams. Must have been someone they know.
Probably his wife / fiancé that couldn’t get away from the scene
Literally could not get away
I’m going to hell
Posted on 7/26/20 at 10:32 pm to LegendInMyMind
quote:What if the protest/riot is illegal and should not be taking place, and you are just in the wrong place at the wrong time?
There are 6 states that have laws that ban the carrying of any firearm by any person involved with any protest or demonstration on public property. It also includes having a firearm in your vehicle if the vehicle is less than 1,000 ft. from the protest area. Alabama is one of those states. I've never given it much thought because I'm not much of a protester, but I think I am in favor of this law.
This post was edited on 7/26/20 at 10:33 pm
Posted on 7/26/20 at 10:34 pm to SUB
With this new info, you pretty much have to assume the driver had his gun out and available, which I don’t blame him as things have been shown to go south pretty fast with these protests/riots. That still shot of the guy pointing the rifle is going to save his arse from jail.
Posted on 7/26/20 at 10:41 pm to Mr Breeze
Protesting appears to actually be the cause. Unnecessarily attack public property and other Americans then scream and cry why you get the reaction you provoked. Majority of these woke folks are just out there to showcase their wokeness on social media. They could give a fudge about whatever this movement is or any other.
Like a million better things they could be doing to better society.
Bring guns to "peaceful" rally then get upset when guns are used and blame the government.
Like a million better things they could be doing to better society.
Bring guns to "peaceful" rally then get upset when guns are used and blame the government.
Posted on 7/26/20 at 10:43 pm to HubbaBubba
quote:Then you're not "involved in the protest or demonstration."
What if the protest/riot is illegal and should not be taking place, and you are just in the wrong place at the wrong time?
Posted on 7/26/20 at 10:53 pm to HubbaBubba
quote:
What if the protest/riot is illegal and should not be taking place, and you are just in the wrong place at the wrong time?
That's why police have discretion.
Posted on 7/26/20 at 11:45 pm to LSUJML
quote:
Probably his wife / fiancé that couldn’t get away from the scene Literally could not get away
It was not....
Look at the beginning of the this Hiram guy’s video when they’re protesting at the police station. You see the victim with his wife.
This chick that described the shooting said that the guy in the car “shot Garrett, the boyfriend of Whitney whose a quadriplegic. He’s been his care taker for like ten years.....
Look a little closer at the pic and you see a girl in a wheelchair....and a guy with a gun.
Posted on 7/26/20 at 11:51 pm to Capstone2017
quote:
Texas is a stand your ground state. He will get off on the criminal side. The civil may be a butch though.
Pretty sure Texas like Florida and Louisiana has laws in place that prohibit monetary damages in civil suits for a justified homicide.
This post was edited on 7/26/20 at 11:54 pm
Posted on 7/27/20 at 12:01 am to LegendInMyMind
quote:
quote:
Hey... did they ever say who shot first... I’m waiting
You know it doesn't matter, right? You can't just go around pointing a rifle at people, especially in a situation like that.
I never questioned who was in the right or wrong. I just wondered how these idiots made a judgement based on the sounds off a 15 sec video.
This post was edited on 7/27/20 at 12:07 am
Page 12 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News