- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
3
Posted on 6/15/20 at 10:23 am to FalseProphet
So, I interview a guy for a job and he seems normal and qualified for the job and I hire him.
He shows up for work a couple days later, but instead of being dressed in a suit and tie, he’s now wearing a dress, makeup, wig and high heels.
And I can’t fire him.
He shows up for work a couple days later, but instead of being dressed in a suit and tie, he’s now wearing a dress, makeup, wig and high heels.
And I can’t fire him.
Posted on 6/15/20 at 10:24 am to EmperorGout
quote:
You know y’all immolated the party on Trumps behalf so you could appoint judges to give social conservatives desperately needed wins in cases just like this, only to lose anyway. You gotta admit on some level it’s pretty funny
It is certainly ironic.
It will simply lead to more people leaving public education, especially in the primary and secondary levels.
The Covid thing was a good dry run for a lot of people to consider alternate means of educating their children. This will help accelerate that.
Posted on 6/15/20 at 10:25 am to Breesus
quote:
doesn't exist anymore. Any man can identy as a woman and thus title 7 is destroyed.
I'm still waiting on a man to get a minority owned business status by identifying as a woman
Posted on 6/15/20 at 10:25 am to PhoenixLSUTiger
quote:
AAAAW! Does someone need their binky?
You're already regretting having yours removed, aren't you?
Posted on 6/15/20 at 10:27 am to bhtigerfan
quote:
He shows up for work a couple days later, but instead of being dressed in a suit and tie, he’s now wearing a dress, makeup, wig and high heels.
Yup. You hired a freak and you’re stuck with him.
Posted on 6/15/20 at 10:27 am to joe68
quote:
All we want is to be treated equally that’s all nothing more and nothing less
This is a lie. You want special treatment. You want to be guaranteed a job even when you partake in abhorrent behavior that reflects poorly on your employer.
Posted on 6/15/20 at 10:28 am to the808bass
quote:
You hired a freak and you’re stuck with him.
"Nah man, you're still free. You can just go out of business." - the Supreme Court of the United States.
This post was edited on 6/15/20 at 10:28 am
Posted on 6/15/20 at 10:28 am to bhtigerfan
If he is qualified and competent at his job, why do you care what he has on his face or what he wears?
Posted on 6/15/20 at 10:28 am to bhtigerfan
quote:
So, I interview a guy for a job and he seems normal and qualified for the job and I hire him.
He shows up for work a couple days later, but instead of being dressed in a suit and tie, he’s now wearing a dress, makeup, wig and high heels.
And I can’t fire him.
Couldn't you fire him under false pretenses? I mean he lied in the interview, right? You fire him for lying to you not the reason he lied.
Posted on 6/15/20 at 10:28 am to BRbornandraised
quote:
If he is qualified and competent at his job, why do you care what he has on his face or what he wears?
What makes you think these are mutually exclusive?
Posted on 6/15/20 at 10:29 am to GumboPot
quote:
Couldn't you fire him under false pretenses? I mean he lied in the interview, right? You fire him for lying to you not the reason he lied.
This seems logical, so it probably wouldn't stand up in court.
Posted on 6/15/20 at 10:29 am to BRbornandraised
quote:
he is qualified and competent at his job, why do you care what he has on his face or what he wears?
Your grandfather would slap you for saying this out loud.
Unless you're under 30, then it's your great grandfather.
Posted on 6/15/20 at 10:30 am to imjustafatkid
You can fire him if he is incompetent or unqualified. But dressing a certain way or putting something on him face doesnt make it so.
Posted on 6/15/20 at 10:30 am to upgrayedd
quote:Yep. To exclude them would be discriminating on their chosen identity.
I'm still waiting on a man to get a minority owned business status by identifying as a woman
Posted on 6/15/20 at 10:30 am to imjustafatkid
quote:
This seems logical, so it probably wouldn't stand up in court.
Sadly you're probably right.
Posted on 6/15/20 at 10:31 am to BRbornandraised
quote:
You can fire him if he is incompetent or unqualified. But dressing a certain way or putting something on him face doesnt make it so.
I disagree.
Posted on 6/15/20 at 10:31 am to uway
Can someone explain to me why this only applies to Title XII? Based on piggybackingg previous precedent that only applied to XII?
What prevents that same precdent and this subsequent opinion to both apply to all of the CRA of 1964?
What prevents that same precdent and this subsequent opinion to both apply to all of the CRA of 1964?
Posted on 6/15/20 at 10:31 am to uway
Alot of grandfathers would slap their granchildren for hiring black people. Doesnt make it right.
Posted on 6/15/20 at 10:31 am to FalseProphet
The gay aspect of it I’m almost ok with except for religious schools, churches, etc. If their religion is against it then they should be able to discriminate.
The trans thing, he’ll no. If I’m a restaurant owner and I don’t want some dude in drag waiting tables there then I should have every right to say no.
The trans thing, he’ll no. If I’m a restaurant owner and I don’t want some dude in drag waiting tables there then I should have every right to say no.
Page 9 of 16
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News