- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Breaking: Declassified Susan Rice email released
Posted on 5/19/20 at 3:37 pm to Bunyan
Posted on 5/19/20 at 3:37 pm to Bunyan
quote:
should not pass sensitive information related to Russia
Based on info Bongino has on his podcast, that sensitive Russian information could pertain to the Steele Dossier. If so, Flynn had already received a heads up from a British contact that Steele's info was crap.
Keeping this info from him would extend the useless investigation.
This post was edited on 5/19/20 at 3:53 pm
0
Posted on 5/19/20 at 4:18 pm to Bunyan
Why does this serial liar Susan Rice write a memo about a Jan 5 meeting on January 20?
Why did she go on 5 TV shows and lie about Benghazi?
Why did she go on 5 TV shows and lie about Benghazi?
Posted on 5/19/20 at 4:23 pm to Bunyan
Is this the memo that Rice wrote, post facto?
Posted on 5/19/20 at 4:26 pm to cajunangelle
They're already doing it
Haberman is anyway
Imagine journalists tripping over themselves to point at a self-serving, 2 weeks after the fact CYA memo to self as evidence of what actually occurred
you can't
Haberman is anyway
Imagine journalists tripping over themselves to point at a self-serving, 2 weeks after the fact CYA memo to self as evidence of what actually occurred
you can't
Posted on 5/19/20 at 4:29 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
Imagine journalists tripping over themselves to point at a self-serving, 2 weeks after the fact CYA memo to self as evidence of what actually occurred
Only alternative is right wing trump enabling conspiracy theorist.
Posted on 5/19/20 at 4:34 pm to Bunyan
"Well, as you can see Your Honor, this email that I wrote to myself 15 days after the event explicitly states that we didn't commit a crime."
Posted on 5/19/20 at 4:41 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
Only alternative is right wing trump enabling conspiracy theorist.
Where is the conspiracy?
Democrats and media colluded for multiple years to undermine the administration and promoted fiction well after it became obvious that the narrative had no legitimacy.
Whether or not Obama has any genuine culpability in that, I don't know, but he was the king dem when it started.
Posted on 5/19/20 at 5:54 pm to Pettifogger
the WH meeting was on the 5th , the email date is the 20th wtf? CYA
Posted on 5/19/20 at 5:57 pm to udtiger
quote:
by the book
Who's book??
Posted on 5/19/20 at 5:59 pm to Pettifogger
quote:
Where is the conspiracy?
I conspired with myself to engage in sarcasm.
Posted on 5/19/20 at 6:41 pm to Bunyan
quote:My guess is it breaks someone cover story, probably by timeline.
Why the frick was this redacted for over 3 years?
Posted on 5/19/20 at 6:45 pm to Bunyan
Was Grinnel friends with Christopher Stevens by chance? This kind of feels personal by him!
Posted on 5/19/20 at 6:50 pm to AuburnTigers
quote:
f you have to say "by the book" then its definitely done NOT by the book
it suggests that other things they do are not by the book
why would you emphasize this?
is every meeting in high levels of government documented with notes or memos ?
Posted on 5/19/20 at 6:53 pm to Bunyan
All I need is a “blank check” of sorts from Trump. I’ll handle these motherfrickers with extreme prejudice
Posted on 5/19/20 at 6:56 pm to Bunyan
Why would you send yourself an email about a meeting 2 weeks after the meeting?
Posted on 5/19/20 at 7:17 pm to ApexTiger
1. Everything should always be done according to policy.
2. What prompted her to make this email so long after the meeting? If she had the opinion that people were breaking policy why would she not be a whistleblower for the Trump administration immediately?
3. The email loses credibility completely because it seems corrupt due to its form and timing.
2. What prompted her to make this email so long after the meeting? If she had the opinion that people were breaking policy why would she not be a whistleblower for the Trump administration immediately?
3. The email loses credibility completely because it seems corrupt due to its form and timing.
This post was edited on 5/19/20 at 7:20 pm
Posted on 5/19/20 at 7:19 pm to Colonel Flagg
100%. So the question is why? Clearly to protect POTUS in recognition that Comey did something dirty.
Posted on 5/19/20 at 8:03 pm to CDawson
quote:
Why would you send yourself an email about a meeting 2 weeks after the meeting?
Not only that it was minutes after Trump was inaugurated and had to be one of the last things she ever did in her position. I know we’ve known about this a long time but it’s hilarious to read this email. It is so obviously an oh shite CYA email for Obama to be able to blame Comey and the crew if they got caught. It’s so stupid. It would be less suspicious to not send anything
Posted on 5/19/20 at 8:43 pm to uway
It cerainly reinforces the perception that Comey felt as though he could pick and chose what he would tell the incoming President.
I would have fired Comey at the second meeting on Valentine's Day...at lunch and have him escorted off the White House grounds and then take him directly home.
I would have fired Comey at the second meeting on Valentine's Day...at lunch and have him escorted off the White House grounds and then take him directly home.
Posted on 5/19/20 at 8:58 pm to uway
quote:Actually this letter shows Obama was calling the shots.
Absolute nothingburger as usual.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News