Started By
Message

re: Do socialists think that billionaires stole their money?

Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:36 am to
Posted by Smeg
Member since Aug 2018
9410 posts
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:36 am to
quote:

They should have paid the people whose labor they used to get rich more. A lot more. It's that simple. Labor is the source of wealth. 

Why don't you try this out? Advertise lawn cutting for $350 per yard in your neighborhood. See if any of your neighbors offer you the job.
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55518 posts
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:38 am to
I dug a two mile trench.

Pay me. I created wealth.
Posted by TideCPA
Member since Jan 2012
10377 posts
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:39 am to
quote:

Labor is the source of wealth.

Creating value is the source of wealth. If labor = wealth, then if I go dig holes in my yard all day and money doesn’t magically appear in my bank account, I’m being cheated by the system. Does that sound reasonable?
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
29997 posts
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:39 am to
quote:

But a lot more people should profit from their labor.


People who talk about the way things “should” be are losers.
Posted by TideCPA
Member since Jan 2012
10377 posts
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:39 am to
Damn it HH you beat me to it.
Posted by jnethe1
Pearland
Member since Dec 2012
16143 posts
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:41 am to
quote:

They should have paid the people whose labor they used to get rich more. A lot more. It's that simple.


Did someone force them to accept the wages they took?

Did someone force them to not change careers?

quote:

Labor is the source of wealth.


So if it’s labor alone, then if I go outside now and just start digging a hole with absolutely no purpose I’ll get money? Because that’s labor?

quote:

We have no problem with people having nice things. But a lot more people should profit from their labor.


The person who gets paid an hourly wage/salary literally has nothing in the game. There is no risk involved. They show up and are provided everything they need to perform their job and then they go home. If the company fails, they lose their job. But the business owner loses everything. So you want the person who has taken out a second mortgage to afford their own business to have absolutely no profit? Do you have any idea what the consequences will be if we remove the possibility for profit? What do you think the motivating factor is for many small businesses? What about the healthcare industry? What about technology companies? If it were not about profit, and everyone was guaranteed a wage, then why would we expect anyone to try harder than their peers? Look at all of the technological breakthroughs that have come from countries that operate in a capitalist manner. You’d give that all up on the basis that some people are rich? Jealousy is just awful, it blinds people to obvious consequences.
This post was edited on 2/25/20 at 7:46 am
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:44 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 2/25/20 at 4:27 pm
Posted by Bestbank Tiger
Premium Member
Member since Jan 2005
71439 posts
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:46 am to
quote:

Labor is the source of wealth


Um...I don't think you understand the difference between wealth and liquidity.

Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
37585 posts
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:49 am to
quote:

They should have paid the people whose labor they used to get rich more.


They paid them fair market price.

quote:

Labor is the source of wealth.


Since when? Name me one time since civilizations started that laborers were more wealthy than businessmen?

quote:

We have no problem with people having nice things. But a lot more people should profit from their labor.


Apparently you do as Bernie wants a wealth tax, not just a high income tax. Name one group that doesn’t profit from their labor outside of prisoners.
Posted by vol-boy
Dixie
Member since Feb 2012
1382 posts
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:50 am to
quote:

We live in a partly crony capitalist system. It's possible to do well by playing by the rules, but billionaires? They don't play by the rules.


What are these rules you speak of?
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
37585 posts
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:50 am to
quote:

Apparently poor people somehow had BILLIONS of dollars stolen from them.


Going to play devils advocate here, but Bernie madhoff did steal Billions from people.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
37585 posts
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:51 am to
So real estate is the only source of wealth and money?
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55518 posts
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:51 am to
quote:

We live in a partly crony capitalist system. It's possible to do well by playing by the rules, but billionaires? They don't play by the rules.



I do not know your political convictions, but the solution to this is to remove state power that incentivizes such rule-breaking to happen. If buying off regulators and legislators produces no discernible benefit, then there will be little and less bribery and influence-buying.

Giving power to the state, at least a republican state, to combat this will only further exacerbate the problem. Rules ostensibly made to curtail corporate influence will produce a barrier to entry that only the most powerful can overcome.
Posted by baybeefeetz
Member since Sep 2009
31647 posts
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:51 am to
For a lot of billionaires, part of life is that money comes in and you decide what happens to it. How much they keep vs what they let others have is a question they face all the time.
Posted by TurkeyBaconLeg
Houston
Member since Jul 2018
1699 posts
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:52 am to
The rich socialists are in it for the power over the poor socialists

The poor socialists are in it for the lazy sense of security they get from free handouts.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134887 posts
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:53 am to
quote:

Rules ostensibly made to curtail corporate influence will produce a barrier to entry that only the most powerful can overcome.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
37585 posts
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:54 am to
quote:

Kinda yeah. How can anyone compete with amazon when local governments bend over backwards for them? Do you think small businesses get equal treatment?


Maybe if we didn’t have such punitive tax measures small business wouldn’t be stifled and people wouldn’t be required to rely on the likes of amazon
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
162258 posts
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:55 am to
quote:



Since when? Name me one time since civilizations started that laborers were more wealthy than businessmen?


Seems a bit of an ambiguous distinction. Is a businessman not also a laborer?
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
37585 posts
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:56 am to
quote:

We live in a partly crony capitalist system. It's possible to do well by playing by the rules, but billionaires? They don't play by the rules.


Because the governments have too much power and influence over business. We should be cutting that back, not increasing it
Posted by HempHead
Big Sky Country
Member since Mar 2011
55518 posts
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:56 am to
quote:

Maybe if we didn’t have such punitive tax measures small business wouldn’t be stifled and people wouldn’t be required to rely on the likes of amazon



FICA and SS contributions alone burden a small business owner with tremendous cost that aren't shown in simple wages paid. It's so much easier for a properly scaled, large business to afford the taxes on labor than it is for someone with just a handful of employees, unless they have a really, really efficient business model.
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram