- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Do socialists think that billionaires stole their money?
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:36 am to Ralph_Wiggum
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:36 am to Ralph_Wiggum
quote:
They should have paid the people whose labor they used to get rich more. A lot more. It's that simple. Labor is the source of wealth.
Why don't you try this out? Advertise lawn cutting for $350 per yard in your neighborhood. See if any of your neighbors offer you the job.
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:38 am to Smeg
I dug a two mile trench.
Pay me. I created wealth.
Pay me. I created wealth.
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:39 am to Ralph_Wiggum
quote:
Labor is the source of wealth.
Creating value is the source of wealth. If labor = wealth, then if I go dig holes in my yard all day and money doesn’t magically appear in my bank account, I’m being cheated by the system. Does that sound reasonable?
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:39 am to Ralph_Wiggum
quote:
But a lot more people should profit from their labor.
People who talk about the way things “should” be are losers.
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:39 am to HempHead
Damn it HH you beat me to it.
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:41 am to Ralph_Wiggum
quote:
They should have paid the people whose labor they used to get rich more. A lot more. It's that simple.
Did someone force them to accept the wages they took?
Did someone force them to not change careers?
quote:
Labor is the source of wealth.
So if it’s labor alone, then if I go outside now and just start digging a hole with absolutely no purpose I’ll get money? Because that’s labor?
quote:
We have no problem with people having nice things. But a lot more people should profit from their labor.
The person who gets paid an hourly wage/salary literally has nothing in the game. There is no risk involved. They show up and are provided everything they need to perform their job and then they go home. If the company fails, they lose their job. But the business owner loses everything. So you want the person who has taken out a second mortgage to afford their own business to have absolutely no profit? Do you have any idea what the consequences will be if we remove the possibility for profit? What do you think the motivating factor is for many small businesses? What about the healthcare industry? What about technology companies? If it were not about profit, and everyone was guaranteed a wage, then why would we expect anyone to try harder than their peers? Look at all of the technological breakthroughs that have come from countries that operate in a capitalist manner. You’d give that all up on the basis that some people are rich? Jealousy is just awful, it blinds people to obvious consequences.
This post was edited on 2/25/20 at 7:46 am
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:44 am to HempHead
(no message)
This post was edited on 2/25/20 at 4:27 pm
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:46 am to Ralph_Wiggum
quote:
Labor is the source of wealth
Um...I don't think you understand the difference between wealth and liquidity.
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:49 am to Ralph_Wiggum
quote:
They should have paid the people whose labor they used to get rich more.
They paid them fair market price.
quote:
Labor is the source of wealth.
Since when? Name me one time since civilizations started that laborers were more wealthy than businessmen?
quote:
We have no problem with people having nice things. But a lot more people should profit from their labor.
Apparently you do as Bernie wants a wealth tax, not just a high income tax. Name one group that doesn’t profit from their labor outside of prisoners.
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:50 am to cahoots
quote:
We live in a partly crony capitalist system. It's possible to do well by playing by the rules, but billionaires? They don't play by the rules.
What are these rules you speak of?
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:50 am to mtntiger
quote:
Apparently poor people somehow had BILLIONS of dollars stolen from them.
Going to play devils advocate here, but Bernie madhoff did steal Billions from people.
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:51 am to TheSexecutioner
So real estate is the only source of wealth and money?
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:51 am to cahoots
quote:
We live in a partly crony capitalist system. It's possible to do well by playing by the rules, but billionaires? They don't play by the rules.
I do not know your political convictions, but the solution to this is to remove state power that incentivizes such rule-breaking to happen. If buying off regulators and legislators produces no discernible benefit, then there will be little and less bribery and influence-buying.
Giving power to the state, at least a republican state, to combat this will only further exacerbate the problem. Rules ostensibly made to curtail corporate influence will produce a barrier to entry that only the most powerful can overcome.
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:51 am to TigerBait1971
For a lot of billionaires, part of life is that money comes in and you decide what happens to it. How much they keep vs what they let others have is a question they face all the time.
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:52 am to Oilfieldbiology
The rich socialists are in it for the power over the poor socialists
The poor socialists are in it for the lazy sense of security they get from free handouts.
The poor socialists are in it for the lazy sense of security they get from free handouts.
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:53 am to HempHead
quote:
Rules ostensibly made to curtail corporate influence will produce a barrier to entry that only the most powerful can overcome.
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:54 am to cahoots
quote:
Kinda yeah. How can anyone compete with amazon when local governments bend over backwards for them? Do you think small businesses get equal treatment?
Maybe if we didn’t have such punitive tax measures small business wouldn’t be stifled and people wouldn’t be required to rely on the likes of amazon
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:55 am to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
Since when? Name me one time since civilizations started that laborers were more wealthy than businessmen?
Seems a bit of an ambiguous distinction. Is a businessman not also a laborer?
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:56 am to cahoots
quote:
We live in a partly crony capitalist system. It's possible to do well by playing by the rules, but billionaires? They don't play by the rules.
Because the governments have too much power and influence over business. We should be cutting that back, not increasing it
Posted on 2/25/20 at 7:56 am to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
Maybe if we didn’t have such punitive tax measures small business wouldn’t be stifled and people wouldn’t be required to rely on the likes of amazon
FICA and SS contributions alone burden a small business owner with tremendous cost that aren't shown in simple wages paid. It's so much easier for a properly scaled, large business to afford the taxes on labor than it is for someone with just a handful of employees, unless they have a really, really efficient business model.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News