- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The Girls Do Porn guy is a fugitive now.
Posted on 1/14/20 at 1:21 pm to NIH
Posted on 1/14/20 at 1:21 pm to NIH
quote:
That’s like saying whoever scores the most points will win.
meanwhile you're declaring a victor before the game has been played.
quote:
According to the new indictment, Pratt attempted to “employ, use, persuade, induce, entice, and coerce a 16-year-old minor to engage in sexually explicit conduct…” for the production of child pornography.
In addition, prosecutors allege that Pratt “harbored, transported, provided, obtained, and maintained…” the 16-year-old and benefited financially in doing so.
Now this is a bit more serious and entirely different than what was described in the OP. Whether or not these girls were minors at the time of engaging in sexual conduct on film (or otherwise) is a matter that should be pretty straightforward to determine.
Posted on 1/14/20 at 1:22 pm to Jorts R Us
quote:
Gee, if only there were court testimony from women that weren't the ones having sex on camera...
Can you explain this? What do you mean other women?
Posted on 1/14/20 at 1:39 pm to CptRusty
Seems pretty easy for every other mainstream porn site to avoid being bombarded with federal charges but I’ll leave you to defend these guys.
Posted on 1/14/20 at 1:41 pm to NIH
quote:
You’re coming across as upset now.
Posted on 1/14/20 at 2:08 pm to Ancient Astronaut
quote:
Can you explain this? What do you mean other women?
Yeah, they were paying women as "reference girls" to tell the women that answered the ads that these guys did things on the up-and-up and could be trusted. They would act as if though they shot with these guys before and that they delivered on all of their promises. Apparently, they would call and text often and push these girls to follow through.
Again, I think the plaintiffs should have seen through the ruse but you can't say these guys didn't go out of their way to deceive.
This post was edited on 1/14/20 at 2:11 pm
Posted on 1/14/20 at 3:00 pm to Ancient Astronaut
quote:
How did they physically prevent them from leaving? Honest question.
According to the article, blocking the exit.
Posted on 1/14/20 at 3:03 pm to Papplesbeast
i Mean I guess I could see that. Not sure why that would compel them to have sex though
Posted on 1/14/20 at 5:47 pm to Ancient Astronaut
Article said male actor raped girl in his car and locked door. Police dropped case
Posted on 1/14/20 at 5:52 pm to Jorts R Us
quote:
Yeah, they were paying women as "reference girls" to tell the women that answered the ads that these guys did things on the up-and-up and could be trusted. They would act as if though they shot with these guys before and that they delivered on all of their promises. Apparently, they would call and text often and push these girls to follow through.
Again, I think the plaintiffs should have seen through the ruse but you can't say these guys didn't go out of their way to deceive
I am sure these guys aren't great people but I still can't wrap my head around how someone in today's day doesn't know that if you frick somebody you don't even know for money on camera it's going to get out.
It's just kind boggling to me
Posted on 1/14/20 at 5:55 pm to ShortyRob
These girls are dumb and why agree to it. Some e joyed apparently some it was painful
Posted on 1/14/20 at 5:55 pm to blueboy
How many hours did the jurors have to sit through and watch all the video evidence?
Posted on 1/14/20 at 5:57 pm to Sentrius
quote:
The GDP crew was the furthest thing from that when they told them that video would be distributed in some faraway land instead of on the internet for anyone
Honestly. Telling a woman your cum tastes like a filet mignon is equally believable.
I have absolutely zero sympathy for these girls. Because bluntly speaking there's no way they actually believed that b*******. They just needed something to justify in their mind that what they were doing was okay
Posted on 1/14/20 at 6:16 pm to fightin tigers
There are some seriously rapey guys in here. Honestly, do half of you read the shite you type? God forbid any of you have daughters
This post was edited on 1/14/20 at 6:18 pm
Posted on 1/14/20 at 6:21 pm to TexasTiger90
Have a daughter.
Doesn't change my opinion that having sex on camera will likely end up bad for the girl and is ill advised.
Doesn't change my opinion that having sex on camera will likely end up bad for the girl and is ill advised.
Posted on 1/14/20 at 8:22 pm to fightin tigers
This man gave us Layla London. I am forever thankful.
Posted on 1/14/20 at 8:24 pm to fightin tigers
quote:
Doesn't change my opinion that having sex on camera will likely end up bad for the girl and is ill advised.
A man can build 100 bridges, but he only has to frick one goat...
Posted on 1/14/20 at 9:18 pm to blueboy
Why can't we all just come to the conclusion that the guys responsible for GDP are massive pieces of shite, and all of the girls who did the videos are complete idiots?
Posted on 1/14/20 at 9:41 pm to MrLSU
quote:
How many hours did the jurors have to sit through and watch all the video evidence?
They probably skipped around a little bit watching approximately 4 minutes.
Posted on 1/14/20 at 10:11 pm to noonan
wow the other GDP thread got whacked..
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)