re: Tell the truth in mixed company?

quote:

---

because kids being adopted into loving families, whether you agree with that love or not, is better than them growing up in an orphanage

---

The way you make that statement it sounds like you think it is a settled question.

LINK

So, the chicks are saying “think like we think, or no sex”...how enlightening.

Get some new chicks.

quote:

---

So did you get any or not?

---

Obviously not since he is posting on here all night talking about his stance on gay adoption and how is hinders his ability to get laid

quote:

---

Ok, I already said it but I’ll try again. If nature does not allow homosexuals to reproduce, why should they be allowed to adopt?

---

By this logic people shouldn’t go to doctors when they are sick because it is not your definition of “natural.” Pretty much everything you do every day is not “natural.”

Not sure how being gay is a predictor of parenting but willing to bet gay parents are probably much better/more loving than most straight parents (who abandoned them with no regard or care to what ever happens to them). Anyone who argues against gay adoption is deep down a indoctrinated religious zealot that is scared to admit it.

quote:

---

It means if it doesn’t occur in nature then maybe there is a reason for it. Seems odd to me to just completely disregard the way the natural world functions.

---

Asexual reproduction occurs in nature. Changing sex occurs in nature. Homosexuality occurs in nature. Offspring being immediately abandoned occurs in nature. Offspring being raised by non-parent members of the pack/group occurs in nature. Hell, we have observed in nature animals “adopting” members of completely different species.

In short, actual ability to reproduce seems to give you first crack at parenting in nature, but after that, all bets are off.

Sound familiar?

This is the point that should have been made, then everyone could get laid.

I have seen how kids are treated in the group home/foster setting. I don’t care who it is, if two responsible stable adults that love each other can make a safe and loving home for a child, it is 100x better than a group home / foster situation.

Fact.

At least in Louisiana it's law that spouses are obligated to "submit to each other's reasonable and normal sexual desires". One must then ponder.....define "reasonable and normal" lol

I'm sure there are similar laws on the books in other states. It old, but still there to be weaponized in case you gotta sue your significant other on the basis of stinginess.

Bro, pu$$y is all powerful. You made the right call. Now, when you're laying in bed "after", then you hash it out.

(no message)

quote:

---

Ok, I already said it but I’ll try again.

---

You shouldn't. Your point of view is ridiculous.

quote:

---

If nature does not allow homosexuals to reproduce, why should they be allowed to adopt?

---

"Nature" doesn't allow us to fly. Are you against air travel? "Nature" doesn't allow us to survive many illnesses and diseases like cancer. Are you against medicine?

There are many examples of how we have defied nature to do good. Why should allowing good people to raise a child be any different? Because you're offended and want to impose your opinion on others. That's why.

Get your head out of your arse and think critically if you can.