- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
A word of caution to Pro Lifers
Posted on 5/15/19 at 6:48 pm
Posted on 5/15/19 at 6:48 pm
I realize that some of you are religious or at the least have sympathy for the unborn. For what it's worth, I'm anti-abortion.
But beware, even if some states ban the practice, it wont solve the economic woes of the state. And the demographic you are trying to target will still behave the same way.
The reason is simple: banning abortion is not a ban on welfare programs. We gain nothing as individuals save the fact that more people get to live (a great thing). So if you're doing this for the moral good, God Bless you.
Myth vs Facts about Welfare
But beware, even if some states ban the practice, it wont solve the economic woes of the state. And the demographic you are trying to target will still behave the same way.
The reason is simple: banning abortion is not a ban on welfare programs. We gain nothing as individuals save the fact that more people get to live (a great thing). So if you're doing this for the moral good, God Bless you.
Myth vs Facts about Welfare
quote:
federal government provides the funding for these programs. The states administer the programs. Some provide additional funds.
Often Congress reduces funds for these programs. If it does it without lowering the states' responsibilities, that creates an unfunded mandate. For example, the 1998 reduction in federal food stamp administration costs added $5 million to state budgets.
Never confuse welfare programs with entitlement programs. Welfare programs are based on a family's income. To qualify, their income must be below an income based on the federal poverty level. Entitlement programs base eligibility upon prior contributions from payroll taxes. The four major U.S. entitlement programs are Social Security, Medicare, unemployment insurance, and worker’s compensation.
Posted on 5/15/19 at 6:50 pm to volod
quote:You should have aborted your strawman.
But beware, even if some states ban the practice, it wont solve the economic woes of the state.
Posted on 5/15/19 at 6:50 pm to volod
Money isn’t everything.... frick off athiest
Posted on 5/15/19 at 6:50 pm to volod
I have no idea the point you’re trying to make. Bless your heart.
Posted on 5/15/19 at 6:52 pm to volod
quote:
it wont solve the economic woes of the state.
I’ve never heard of anyone claiming this.
Posted on 5/15/19 at 6:52 pm to volod
quote:
But beware, even if some states ban the practice, it wont solve the economic woes of the state. And the demographic you are trying to target will still behave the same way.
What? banning abortion is about stopping murder. It has nothing to do with religion. It has nothing to do with fixing economic woes of the state and it isn't targeted and ANY demographic?
What the hell am I missing here?
Posted on 5/15/19 at 6:54 pm to volod
Abortion being evil has nothing to do with welfare
Posted on 5/15/19 at 7:00 pm to volod
quote:
But beware, even if some states ban the practice, it wont solve the economic woes of the state
Oh shite, for real? My pro-life stance was purely financial. Now that you've corrected the record, I'm cool with abortion. Thank you for the info.
Posted on 5/15/19 at 7:04 pm to volod
quote:
And the demographic you are trying to target will still behave the same way.
That's a seriously impressive straw man you've got there baw.
Posted on 5/15/19 at 7:10 pm to volod
quote:
For what it's worth, I'm anti-abortion.
Who the hell ever says this?
I've never heard a pro-lifer claim to be anti-abortion. There are several variations for the use of the word abortion.
Life is a pretty constant argument.
Posted on 5/15/19 at 7:12 pm to the808bass
quote:
I have no idea the point you’re trying to make. Bless your heart.
Posted on 5/15/19 at 7:18 pm to volod
quote:
A word of caution to Pro Lifers
So your cautious word is to tell me that erring on the side of life over destruction is a bad thing and could have adverse economic consequences?
If the economic consequences are the determiner of one's worth and ending life is the solution to solve the economic issues of any given State, shouldn't the end result of this thesis be to just kill all of the non contributors that suck off of the economic system?
Hopefully this highlights how pitiful your argument is.
This post was edited on 5/15/19 at 11:42 pm
Posted on 5/15/19 at 7:19 pm to volod
Do you think it’s about money?
Posted on 5/15/19 at 7:28 pm to volod
So we're trying to "target" people to live?
Posted on 5/15/19 at 7:31 pm to volod
How about this...you can get an abortion, but you get sterilized when you get it done.
Posted on 5/15/19 at 7:37 pm to volod
If we were looking to save economic woes , then we would want abortions.
Innocent lives> anything else
Innocent lives> anything else
Posted on 5/15/19 at 7:40 pm to volod
Baby steps, no pun intended. We quit killing the innocent and next we start letting otherwise healthy people too lazy to work starve to death. I'd rather feed and support orphaned children than the evil women that abort them or other adults too lazy to sustain themselves and continue down the generational welfare path we're on.
Posted on 5/15/19 at 8:34 pm to volod
Economics are a separate issue to deal with. You can’t support the killing of humans in an effort to improve the economy. We could easily justify killing a lot of people who are on welfare today as a means to alleviate economic woes but that would be immoral, too.
Posted on 5/15/19 at 8:43 pm to volod
You are flailing like a poorly stuck wahoo on deck.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News