Started By
Message

re: Washington Post Defends Marx – “Five Myths About Socialism”

Posted on 3/2/19 at 10:50 am to
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112616 posts
Posted on 3/2/19 at 10:50 am to
quote:

Why are these people so intent on fricking up the language?


Because when words have meaning they lose. That's why they hate the Constitution as written. It is a 'living breathing document' that means whatever they say it does.
Posted by Loserman
Member since Sep 2007
21966 posts
Posted on 3/2/19 at 10:50 am to
quote:

social democracy has arguably been the single most successful modern ideology or political movement


Oh Really?

I would love the Author to show us just one successful example!

Especially, I would love for the Author to show us one example where a poor country implemented democratic socialism and it raised the average standard of living to 1st world standards.

The biggest failure of a planned economy is when one mistake is made it affects the whole.

In decentralized economies it takes many mistakes by multiple actors to affect the whole.

Posted by Chocolate Jesus
Deep in the Heart of Texas
Member since Jan 2019
360 posts
Posted on 3/2/19 at 10:51 am to
"A Nation of Sheep will beget a government of wolves"

Edward R. Murrow
Posted by Choctaw
Pumpin' Sunshine
Member since Jul 2007
77774 posts
Posted on 3/2/19 at 11:01 am to
Socialism is just one murder away from communism
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112740 posts
Posted on 3/2/19 at 11:03 am to
quote:

Sheri Berman


Yep
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
16777 posts
Posted on 3/2/19 at 11:24 am to
quote:

I think communism could work on a very small scale.


Absolutely it could. And all participants would have to be ok with the minimal lifestyle provided by government since communism doesn’t reward exceptionalism.
This post was edited on 3/2/19 at 11:25 am
Posted by MI LSU
NYC
Member since Oct 2009
1136 posts
Posted on 3/2/19 at 11:30 am to
quote:

What you know is not real. What you believe isn’t founded. Your mind and heart have lied to you, so let us tell you what’s truth.

-love, Fox News
Posted by rintintin
Life is Life
Member since Nov 2008
16196 posts
Posted on 3/2/19 at 11:43 am to
quote:

MYTH NO. 3 
All socialists want to abolish markets and private property. 

Communists, when in power, have done away with markets and private property. Democratic socialists say that in principle they hope capitalism will disappear over the long run, but in the meantime they advocate piecemeal changes in the ownership and control of economic resources — bank nationalization, for instance. 


How fricking intellectually dishonest....or just straight up ignorant.

What they'll do is pass laws that make it impossible for the free market to survive in certain sectors. And yes, eventually Capitalism will fold, but not because people found it better otherwise, but because the gov't took control.

How is that any different than "abolishing markets"?

If I force you to pay a $1 million fee in order to own a gun, I can say I didn't ban guns.

fricking idiots.
Posted by countrytiger60
Larose
Member since Sep 2018
3653 posts
Posted on 3/2/19 at 11:49 am to
socialist suck, liberals suck and democrats suck. go Trump.
Posted by VOR
Member since Apr 2009
63658 posts
Posted on 3/2/19 at 11:51 am to
Honestly, he’s not totally wrong, if you take the time to do a little research.
Posted by rintintin
Life is Life
Member since Nov 2008
16196 posts
Posted on 3/2/19 at 11:57 am to
Of course you'd say that. He's not totally right either.

I could write an article regarding myths pertaining to absolutely anything, and paint it in a positive light.

The real question is, why? Why defend it at all? It's apparent the MSM and progressives are trying to start a narrative condoning Socialism, all while y'all sit there and say, "Stop being so paranoid, we're not trying to implement Socialism."
Posted by Fat Bastard
coach, investor, gambler
Member since Mar 2009
73191 posts
Posted on 3/2/19 at 12:09 pm to
one is no private ownership aka businesses

one is no personal property

both suck

they love calling scandinavia a success in socialism because it is in a sector like healthcare for example.

that is not full blown socialism like venezuela in all sectors. but those scandinavian taxes are through the roof! to pay for that shite in small countries.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
261684 posts
Posted on 3/2/19 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

Honestly, he’s not totally wrong, if you take the time to do a little research.


It's painfully obvious he doesn't understand Socialism or Communism.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
147389 posts
Posted on 3/2/19 at 12:18 pm to
you put the avi in.
Posted by Antonio Moss
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2006
48330 posts
Posted on 3/2/19 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

He’s not totally wrong



quote:

After the Russian Revolution, a commitment to democracy became a key distinction dividing socialists from communists.


He’s totally fricking wrong about this. Both the Bolsheviks and the Mensheviks were socialist factions under the Marxist-Leninist movement. The Menshiviks weren’t pro-democracy, the wanted to expanded party membership to some more members of the former elite class but there still wouldn’t be popular voting initiates outside of the party.

And the Bolsheviks fricking killed them for it.

This article is such nonsense.
Posted by Jimbeaux
Member since Sep 2003
20145 posts
Posted on 3/2/19 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

Communism certainly failed, but social democracy has arguably been the single most successful modern ideology or political movement.


This is one of those half-truths based on loose definitions whose use are so persuasive to the simple minded, and so typically used of the left.

It’s true that unfettered and unregulated capitalism has problems. It’s also true that our current economic system has many layers of regulations (broadly defined) and interventions which are often beneficial at least for a while (each is up for debate).

But regulated capitalism and democratic socialism are not the same thing, not by a long shot. The distinction between the two is the difference in their fundamental presuppositions - or ideology.

Democratic socialism presupposes that free markets are fundamentally corrupt and that regulation is not only good, but necessary. The answer to every problem is more government intervention - intervention that includes (and invariably becomes) total government take-over. This takeover is not feared, it’s welcomed.

In fact, the rapidity of this desire for takeover is so quick, that most democratic socialists just make that the starting point of their solution.

“Government run healthcare” and “single payer healthcare” are practically indistinguishable.

“If climate change looks like it’s going to make problems for humans, well, let’s just outlaw cars and planes, build trains, rebuild every single building in America to be energy efficiently, and our problems will solved. Think about all of that employment!”

Regulated capitalism understands that free markets are about freedom of exchange, and that the miracle of free markets creates wealth and prosperity. It acknowledges that this freedom can allow for some entities to get too powerful and/or corrupted to the detriment of the majority, or that the common good and long term benefits can get neglected. Some regulation and protections are required, but those regulations always have negative side effects which must be constantly monitored.

A true regulated capitalist recognizes that the regulations themselves lead to corruption and that every effort should be taken to remove regulations when they are no longer useful or have become detrimental. They also know how very hard it can be to remove regulations and government interventions once they’re in place, and they must take that into consideration before ever enacting them.

Posted by Malik Agar
Member since Nov 2012
12076 posts
Posted on 3/2/19 at 12:28 pm to
America desperately needs a lot of these people to take free helicopter rides.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112616 posts
Posted on 3/2/19 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

I think communism could work on a very small scale for a short amount of time,


Yeah, it's called marriage. It works about half the time.
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
35120 posts
Posted on 3/2/19 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

Honestly, he’s not totally wrong, if you take the time to do a little research.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
261684 posts
Posted on 3/2/19 at 12:37 pm to
quote:

or just straight up ignorant.


I'm leaning this way. He seems to have no real knowledge of economic systems.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram