- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 11/25/18 at 2:49 pm to The Mick
Isn't the current rule you must "secure the ball" before it hits the ground or going out of field of play?
Two hands, moving the ball to the breadbasket (towards the sideline side as they are taught) would be "securing the ball" if he'd run out of bounds.
That's all you need to do to decide if fumble or not... if that's an LSU reciever and he stepped out of bounds at the point that ball is on his left side would you be screaming holy hell because that was ruled incomplete?
If that's a step out of bounds and they ruled it incomplete you bet they'd review and overturn it.
Two hands, moving the ball to the breadbasket (towards the sideline side as they are taught) would be "securing the ball" if he'd run out of bounds.
That's all you need to do to decide if fumble or not... if that's an LSU reciever and he stepped out of bounds at the point that ball is on his left side would you be screaming holy hell because that was ruled incomplete?
If that's a step out of bounds and they ruled it incomplete you bet they'd review and overturn it.
Posted on 11/25/18 at 3:16 pm to The Mick
I think the officials told Ed it had already been looked at and a timeout wouldn’t change that
Posted on 11/25/18 at 3:35 pm to rpg37
quote:
Seems like refs are taught now to let the play run its course on close turnovers. The A&M pick six in the second quarter where the ball was rolling on the ground was played out and not this one. Awful officiating. Plus, the whistle was blown late proving he didn't know. If that was called a fumble on the field, it would have been upheld.
This blatant in-game inconsistency is the big problem. Same with the last two PIs, one on each team. They were letting that same play go for an entire game and 5 OTs. The PI on Greedy was just icing. The refs let it get personal.
Posted on 11/25/18 at 3:35 pm to The Mick
quote:
owever, he then gets a firm grasp on the ball with his right hand in the next frame and has full possession of the ball, takes a full step and then is hit by Delpit causing the fumble.
What you're describing is not a fumble. It's an incomplete pass.
Posted on 11/25/18 at 3:35 pm to BilJ
Where does your info come from? I’m not questioning you just trying to find an origin other than heard from a guy who heard from a guy.
Posted on 11/25/18 at 3:43 pm to The Mick
1) He never tucked the ball away. No one runs with the ball held out in front of them, like it is when Delpit makes contact. No possession
2) The whistle blew immediately. LSU cannot be awarded a recovery due to an "inadvertent" whistle. The possessing team gets the option of redoing the play, by rule. So A&M retains possession either way
2) The whistle blew immediately. LSU cannot be awarded a recovery due to an "inadvertent" whistle. The possessing team gets the option of redoing the play, by rule. So A&M retains possession either way
Posted on 11/25/18 at 3:47 pm to RobbBobb
There is no tuck rule in college
And the whistle did not blow before greedy picked up the ball.
And the whistle did not blow before greedy picked up the ball.
Posted on 11/25/18 at 3:52 pm to LuckyTiger
quote:
when O was questioning the call, telling him not to call a TO hoping for a video review because they weren’t changing the call regardless of what video might show.
Wow. If this is true, that's pretty damn pathetic.
Posted on 11/25/18 at 3:53 pm to The Mick
Catch; football move; fumble. Ball game.
Posted on 11/25/18 at 3:55 pm to LNCHBOX
You can’t review this. The refs blew it dead on the field, thus no recovery could be made. They should have let it play out and ruled it a fumble. It’s a frustrating rule. Only a ball called a fumble on the field can be reviwed. Non- fumble calls can never be overturned and called a fumble.
Posted on 11/25/18 at 3:56 pm to The Mick
Slow motion replay is why refs miss this call. In real time it’s an obvious catch/fumble.... Of course no replay at all is even worse.
Reminds me of a Hester play that went against us in 06 auburn (?) I think . Another notorious screw job by the refs.
Reminds me of a Hester play that went against us in 06 auburn (?) I think . Another notorious screw job by the refs.
This post was edited on 11/25/18 at 3:58 pm
Posted on 11/25/18 at 3:57 pm to EvrybodysAllAmerican
quote:It was called incomplete in real time, there was no replay officially.
Slow motion replay is why refs miss this call. In real time it’s an obvious catch/fumble.
Posted on 11/25/18 at 3:59 pm to The Mick
I know. I’m just saying that slow mo is misleading on these type plays. If one were to review it. (Looking at the videos in the original post)
This post was edited on 11/25/18 at 4:00 pm
Posted on 11/25/18 at 3:59 pm to The Mick
Fumble. Had he caught that at the 1, crossed goalline and delpit make that hit in the endzone they wouldve called a td
Posted on 11/25/18 at 4:02 pm to LuckyTiger
quote:
There were so many questionable calls by the officials.
And even the ones they got right, they made them in a way that gave A&M free time outs/additional time.
Posted on 11/25/18 at 4:14 pm to LSUbase13
quote:
It was one of many bad calls. Move on.
Move on to what. Another waste of a season. Next year will be the same shite. To hell with the sec
Posted on 11/25/18 at 4:18 pm to geauxjo
Dude you’re making shite up as you go. A fumble or non-fumble call can absolutely be reviewed and overturned.
Posted on 11/25/18 at 4:19 pm to The Mick
quote:
And the whistle did not blow before greedy picked up the ball.
Yes it did
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News