- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
If I'm Cleveland I take Saquon Barkley with the #1 pick
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:09 pm
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:09 pm
and take my highest rated QB at #4. I don't think any of the QB's separated themselves enough to go #1. But Darnold, Rosen, and Allen could all be good picks at #4.
Thoughts?
Thoughts?
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:12 pm to L.A.
If they get Baker and Barkley then they're going to run their division in a couple years.
Not really Saints related though.
Not really Saints related though.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:18 pm to L.A.
Depends on how they feel about Kizer.
If they are not all in on Kizer they have to get qb at #1.
I don't think they can risk rb at 1 after they got burned by T. Richardson
If they are not all in on Kizer they have to get qb at #1.
I don't think they can risk rb at 1 after they got burned by T. Richardson
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:25 pm to L.A.
I take Barkley at #1, trade down a couple spots and take either Calvin Ridley or Quenton Nelson. Sign Keenum, Bradford, or Teddy. Give Kizer another year or two to learn and see where that goes. Get two offensive studs to match the studs on defense they have. Bradford would be ideal for them. Nice mentor for Kizer.
Or, if they like Jackson or Mayfield that much, trade back into the 1st to get one of those guys in the backend of round 1. Would be a homerun, IMO.
Or, if they like Jackson or Mayfield that much, trade back into the 1st to get one of those guys in the backend of round 1. Would be a homerun, IMO.
This post was edited on 3/7/18 at 3:27 pm
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:25 pm to L.A.
I really wonder sometimes if people actually watched barkley's film. Yea he is a freak athlete, but disappeared at the end of a lot of games.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:28 pm to L.A.
The problem with taking a RB, especially with where the Browns are now as a franchise, is that RB shelf lives are short. Jeremy Hill was drafted in the same draft as Derek Carr and yet Hill is already seen as past his prime while Carr is a decade away from being seen as aging. Literally a decade away.
I don't think you can pass on a QB at #1 here.
I don't think you can pass on a QB at #1 here.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:36 pm to L.A.
They'll take him at 1 then trade him. Then they'll take Mayfield, Guide, and Chark!
Posted on 3/7/18 at 3:49 pm to L.A.
When guys like Leveon Bell went in 2nd, David Johnson in 3rd, Kamara in 3rd, McCoy in 2nd, Hunt in 3rd, Ajayi in 5th, Freeman in 4th why the frick would you pick a RB 1st overall. I don't care who he is. Especially when you do not have a QB.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 4:00 pm to L.A.
quote:
If I'm Cleveland
Wait, you don't know whether you're Cleveland?
Posted on 3/7/18 at 4:01 pm to L.A.
I think the problem with this line of thinking is that your scouts and coaches are going to like a specific guy. They're going to prefer one of these guys, have a vision for them. I don't see them really being like "I could take Darnold, Rosen, OR Allen and they'll all work!" .. the QB position just doesn't really work that way. And if that is the case, if you feel more strongly about one of the guys, then you're potentially missing out on your preference at the most important position in the game for a running back.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 4:08 pm to L.A.
quote:
If I'm Cleveland I take Saquon Barkley with the #1 pick
Well you would be a complete idiot ,but it is in line with something that Cleveland would do. It is not that hard they need a franchise QB so go ahead and take Darnold. How many times will they pass on a Wentz, Goff, or Watson to go for a stud in the draft with the first pick and try to get a QB later on. They need to go get a Franchise QB especially with this draft and build around him.
This post was edited on 3/7/18 at 4:10 pm
Posted on 3/7/18 at 4:13 pm to L.A.
The Browns could’ve and should’ve broke the bank for Kirk Cousins. Then drafting SB no.1 would make perfect sense. But they let him get away.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 4:17 pm to L.A.
I just think it's funny that they draft a QB basically every year & they still haven't found one.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 4:26 pm to L.A.
Take Barkley #1 and trade back to take Mayfield.
Would be a solid move for them.
Sooner or later, Cleveland will get it together like Jacksonville just managed to do.
Sometimes all it takes is 1 player.
Would be a solid move for them.
Sooner or later, Cleveland will get it together like Jacksonville just managed to do.
Sometimes all it takes is 1 player.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 4:31 pm to L.A.
I probably would too.
1. They're probably going to add a QB like Case Keenum or AJ McCarron.
2. There's no clear cut #1 QB prospect so one of them will fall to #4. shite, Indy probably isn't taking QB and there's a chance the Giants might not either.
3. There's a steep fall off from Barkley to the next best RB prospect.
4. Ezekiel Elliott and Leonard Fournette proving RB's can carry mediocre QBs to W's.
1. They're probably going to add a QB like Case Keenum or AJ McCarron.
2. There's no clear cut #1 QB prospect so one of them will fall to #4. shite, Indy probably isn't taking QB and there's a chance the Giants might not either.
3. There's a steep fall off from Barkley to the next best RB prospect.
4. Ezekiel Elliott and Leonard Fournette proving RB's can carry mediocre QBs to W's.
This post was edited on 3/7/18 at 4:32 pm
Posted on 3/7/18 at 4:45 pm to L.A.
quote:
If I'm Cleveland I take a QB with the #1 pick
Simply to add yet another name to the career ending team legacy.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 4:54 pm to L.A.
Whatever else they do in the draft Barkley at #1 should be a no brainer....but cleveland doh!
Posted on 3/7/18 at 5:03 pm to L.A.
quote:
I don't think any of the QB's separated themselves enough to go #1
as others have said in this thread, they likely have a guy they like. This isn't fantasy football; you don't just "take the one thats left over". If they have 2 they like, then yea, you might see that happen. I think once it gets down to it, the pressure will be on to take a QB with the first pick. It's already starting.
Posted on 3/7/18 at 5:04 pm to L.A.
If all of those QB's are rated evenly,
I trade the number 1 pick for more picks in the draft, including the trading teams 1 and 2. If this guy is so good of a back to take at 1, they will give a 1 and 2. Then I take the QB at 4. I use the other first and second round picks to start working around him. Clear up any holes on the Line and get a Good WR to go with him. Maybe even that TE from South Carolina as well.
Because let's be honest... The Browns aren't a RB and a QB away from a winning season. A team with that little wins in the last three years has holes all over the place. Get the most picks you can get for that number 1.
I trade the number 1 pick for more picks in the draft, including the trading teams 1 and 2. If this guy is so good of a back to take at 1, they will give a 1 and 2. Then I take the QB at 4. I use the other first and second round picks to start working around him. Clear up any holes on the Line and get a Good WR to go with him. Maybe even that TE from South Carolina as well.
Because let's be honest... The Browns aren't a RB and a QB away from a winning season. A team with that little wins in the last three years has holes all over the place. Get the most picks you can get for that number 1.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)