- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Yall remember the little couple that stole all that fishin equip?
Posted on 2/28/18 at 9:12 am
Posted on 2/28/18 at 9:12 am
Not Guilty!
quote:
Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry’s office is not recommending prosecuting two former employees of the Department of Wildlife and Fisheries who were accused of keeping thousands of dollars of fishing and sports equipment in the wake of the 2010 BP oil spill, according to media reports. A spokeswoman for Landry on Tuesday told KATC-TV the office isn’t suggesting that Baton Rouge District Attorney Hillar Moore pursue charges against Eric Newman and Monique Savoy, who left the LDWF in 2014. “Our office thoroughly investigated this complaint and determined there is currently insufficient evidence for a successful prosecution,” Ruth Wisher said in a statement. Last June, an audit report from Legislative Auditor Daryl Purpera said auditors looking for more than $50,000 in missing fishing equipment believed they found many of the items with the couple, who have since married and own a charter fishing company in Venice. “The evidence seems to suggest that they never did anything wrong and that they were good employees of Wildlife and Fisheries,” the couple’s lawyer, Vincent Wynne, said Tuesday in the report.
quote:
The missing equipment, including rods and reels, high-end coolers, a paddle board and more, was purchased by the LDWF with funds from BP after the oil spill to supposedly perform seafood safety testing. The couple had items totaling more than $19,000 that matched descriptions of the missing equipment in their possession or offered for sale online, the audit said. The report said the workers may have violated state law in keeping the state-owned equipment for personal use, according to KATC. Wynne said the audit “was absolutely replete with falsities, misrepresentations and inaccuracies throughout.” In a written response to the earlier audit, Wynne had said there wasn’t a way to track which items may have broken or been lost during fish testing.
Posted on 2/28/18 at 9:15 am to sonoma8
friends in the right places. crock o' shite though
Posted on 2/28/18 at 9:27 am to sonoma8
Pretty standard Louisiana politics. Is it really any wonder why this state is ranked 50th?
Posted on 2/28/18 at 9:28 am to sonoma8
Didn't they try to or did sell some online? It would be one thing if they kept it for themselves, but how can you not prosecute someone for selling government property?
Posted on 2/28/18 at 9:57 am to sonoma8
Actually the article pretty much says they are guilty but our super political AG just decided he wants them to be able to keep the stolen loot and not face any consequences.
In my opinion they should at least be required to reimburse the state for what they stole. They are using the equipment in their charter business.
In my opinion they should at least be required to reimburse the state for what they stole. They are using the equipment in their charter business.
Posted on 2/28/18 at 10:13 am to TBoy
Ya'll remember this when Jeff Landry wants to be governor. dude is a serious cuck.
Posted on 2/28/18 at 10:15 am to TBoy
If it's a state asset under 1k cash, it is insanely easy to take.
Assets under 1k aren't tracked.
For over 1k, there's a barcode, digital asset tracking system, and yearly audits.
Given the property managers of the larger agencies have bonds on them, it was likely cheaper to make them eat crow rather than the thieves.
If the assets were never tagged, it is 100% the fault of the property manager, rather than the thieves.
Assets under 1k aren't tracked.
For over 1k, there's a barcode, digital asset tracking system, and yearly audits.
Given the property managers of the larger agencies have bonds on them, it was likely cheaper to make them eat crow rather than the thieves.
If the assets were never tagged, it is 100% the fault of the property manager, rather than the thieves.
Posted on 2/28/18 at 10:19 am to X123F45
Jeff Landry is such an amazing piece of shite
Posted on 2/28/18 at 10:21 am to Zach Lee To Amp Hill
That auditing system isn't desogned to force arrests. Short of reporting the thefts to the local authorities, something that almost never happens, it becomes too difficult to prosecute because they can't prove who had what and when.
The charges they will likely pursue are malfeasance in office. Give it a little more time.
The charges they will likely pursue are malfeasance in office. Give it a little more time.
Posted on 2/28/18 at 10:24 am to sonoma8
And the LADWF wants to raise fees or they will have to lay people off!!
Posted on 2/28/18 at 10:35 am to sonoma8
Damn......since I need some new shite I'm applying for a job with them....can I use you guys as a reference?
Posted on 2/28/18 at 10:37 am to sonoma8
Thanks for the talica, bitches.

Posted on 2/28/18 at 10:41 am to baldona
quote:
Didn't they try to or did sell some online?
From what I remember when this originally came out they were selling like 6 large Shimano Stellas ($$$$$$$) NIB online. I believe some other equipment too but the Stellas stuck out.
quote:
In my opinion they should at least be required to reimburse the state for what they stole
Donate the amount plus some for a fund to take disadvantaged youth fishing.
This post was edited on 2/28/18 at 10:43 am
Posted on 2/28/18 at 10:43 am to 34venture
That new SeeVee sure is pretty
Posted on 2/28/18 at 10:50 am to 34venture
Eh, everyone has the right to be frustrated here, but at least tax dollars didn’t buy the equipment in question. Wrong is wrong though, so a head-scratching event.
I’m sure in the end, they could not definitively prove this equipment was the lost equipment. Reasonable doubt would have made for tough prosecution.
I’m sure in the end, they could not definitively prove this equipment was the lost equipment. Reasonable doubt would have made for tough prosecution.
Posted on 2/28/18 at 10:55 am to sonoma8
Wow, I'm shocked... Never change Louisiana
Posted on 2/28/18 at 11:01 am to sloopy
It wouldn't have gone to trial anywhere if the items weren't serialized and recorded properly.
Too much doubt.
Too much doubt.
This post was edited on 2/28/18 at 12:01 pm
Popular
Back to top

13










