- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Gun control lobby going after muzzleloaders now?
Posted on 11/18/17 at 12:09 am to Rougarou13
Posted on 11/18/17 at 12:09 am to Rougarou13
the 2nd amendment doesn't imply any general constitutional right for individuals to bear arms or form private armies.
it was intended as a right guaranteed to a state. not for you as an individual.
just an example of the plutocracy at work.. large campaign donations do wonders to shift policy in a corporations favor
it was intended as a right guaranteed to a state. not for you as an individual.
just an example of the plutocracy at work.. large campaign donations do wonders to shift policy in a corporations favor
This post was edited on 11/18/17 at 12:16 am
15
Posted on 11/18/17 at 12:25 am to bmy
You probably need to bone up on your Supreme Court baw... Because you're looking pretty uneducated right now.
Posted on 11/18/17 at 12:27 am to bmy
quote:
the 2nd amendment doesn't imply any general constitutional right for individuals to bear arms or form private armies.
it was intended as a right guaranteed to a state. not for you as an individual.
The Supreme Court begs to differ.
Posted on 11/18/17 at 1:08 am to bmy
quote:
was intended as a right guaranteed to a state.
2nd= right of the PEOPLE
10th= are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Notice the founders thought those words were two different things?
You know we have these wonderful pages written of the minutes during the Constitutional convention. People should read them. It explains exactly what and why they wrote the Constitution the way they did.
Posted on 11/18/17 at 1:24 am to bmy
quote:about that
the 2nd amendment doesn't imply any general constitutional right for individuals to bear arms
quote:
the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Posted on 11/18/17 at 2:20 am to bmy
quote:
it was intended as a right guaranteed to a state. not for you as an individual.
Wrong. It's OK, though. I know words are hard to understand.
Posted on 11/18/17 at 2:29 am to bmy
The entire bill of rights are rights to individuals
Posted on 11/18/17 at 4:21 am to bmy
quote:
the 2nd amendment doesn't imply any general constitutional right for individuals to bear arms or form private armies.
it was intended as a right guaranteed to a state. not for you as an individual.
Exhibit A of how stupidity is the true enemy of freedom.
Posted on 11/18/17 at 5:05 am to bmy
quote:
it was intended as a right guaranteed to a state. not for you as an individual.
Where is that stated in the constitution?
Posted on 11/18/17 at 5:18 am to bmy
You're the poster child for why not everyone should be allowed to vote.
Posted on 11/18/17 at 6:04 am to bmy
quote:
the 2nd amendment doesn't imply any general constitutional right for individuals to bear arms or form private armies. it was intended as a right guaranteed to a state. not for you as an individual.
Where’d you get your law degree?
Might want to ask for a refund
Posted on 11/18/17 at 10:20 am to bmy
quote:
the 2nd amendment doesn't imply any general constitutional right for individuals to bear arms
Must've missed that in the wording of the actual bill of rights.
quote:
the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
This post was edited on 11/18/17 at 10:21 am
Posted on 11/18/17 at 10:42 am to bmy
"shall not be infringed"
Posted on 11/18/17 at 11:00 am to bmy
Does the 1st Amendment only apply to states rights? What about 4th Amendment? What about the 6th Amendment?
How does it make any logical sense to you at all that the bill of rights was written to give rights to individual citizens EXCEPT FOR ONE?!
How does it make any logical sense to you at all that the bill of rights was written to give rights to individual citizens EXCEPT FOR ONE?!
Posted on 11/18/17 at 2:01 pm to bmy
quote:
the 2nd amendment doesn't imply any general constitutional right for individuals to bear arms or form private armies.
it was intended as a right guaranteed to a state. not for you as an individual.
just an example of the plutocracy at work.. large campaign donations do wonders to shift policy in a corporations favor
Just so you know, its people like yourself that keep me from ever giving an inch on any kind of gun legislation. Not an inch.
Posted on 11/19/17 at 8:45 am to bmy
Lol maybe look up some SC descions on this subject.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News