Started By
Message
locked post

Thoughts on Mayor Landrieu's speech before the removal of the monuments?

Posted on 5/24/17 at 1:58 pm
Posted by L.A.
The Mojave Desert
Member since Aug 2003
61457 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 1:58 pm
I think he makes some good points. I'd love to hear what others think of the speech.

quote:

But there are also other truths about our city that we must confront. New Orleans was America’s largest slave market: a port where hundreds of thousands of souls were brought, sold and shipped up the Mississippi River to lives of forced labor of misery of rape, of torture.

America was the place where nearly 4,000 of our fellow citizens were lynched, 540 alone in Louisiana; where the courts enshrined ‘separate but equal’; where Freedom riders coming to New Orleans were beaten to a bloody pulp.

So when people say to me that the monuments in question are history, well what I just described is real history as well, and it is the searing truth.

And it immediately begs the questions: why there are no slave ship monuments, no prominent markers on public land to remember the lynchings or the slave blocks; nothing to remember this long chapter of our lives; the pain, the sacrifice, the shame … all of it happening on the soil of New Orleans.

So for those self-appointed defenders of history and the monuments, they are eerily silent on what amounts to this historical malfeasance, a lie by omission.

There is a difference between remembrance of history and reverence of it. For America and New Orleans, it has been a long, winding road, marked by great tragedy and great triumph. But we cannot be afraid of our truth.

LINK
Posted by hawkeye007
Member since Feb 2010
5915 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 1:59 pm to
i thought it was a solid speech. now duck because he comes the down votes and poster's calling him liberal white washing scum.
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
51818 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 1:59 pm to
I didn't hear his speech but as a general rule I think anyone that's into revisionist history is a fricking idiot.
Posted by WHS
walker LA.
Member since Feb 2006
3130 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 2:00 pm to
Mitch is a liberal cuck looking for personal political gain
end of story.
Posted by Mr.Perfect
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2013
17444 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 2:02 pm to
So many fallacies in one place.
Posted by EKG
Houston, TX
Member since Jun 2010
44167 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 2:04 pm to
If you're interested in reading others' thoughts, there's another thread on this subject: link.
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
62730 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 2:04 pm to
The back flipping justification screams that he knows he pissed off a lot of people, and throwing the "how do you explain it to the kids" was the ultimate tell that he went too far in his exploitative propaganda. This is like the Nazis burning books, or ISIS destroying Ancient Iraqi artifacts and history. Well, this is Landrieu's legacy, now. Deal with it. That's what I get from it...
Posted by TheArrogantCorndog
Highland Rd
Member since Sep 2009
14847 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 2:05 pm to

Posted by Quarterite
The Lower Quarter
Member since Oct 2016
959 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 2:11 pm to
Calling them monuments to "The Cult of the Lost Cause" is genius. And exactly correct. Have an up vote, sir.

Posted by Brosef Stalin
Member since Dec 2011
39373 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 2:13 pm to
I don't understand why this is such a pressing issue now. Especially with everything else that needs to be fixed in that town.
Posted by AggieDub14
Oil Baron
Member since Oct 2015
14624 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 2:13 pm to
Several of my high school English teachers were blowing up Facebook about this. They are going to use the speech when teaching Huck Finn.

I still don't get how relocating monuments built in the 1880s to commemorate The Cult of the Lost Cause is destroying history. They aren't being destroyed. They aren't honoring the south or the men they represent.
This post was edited on 5/24/17 at 2:16 pm
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
34035 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

So when people say to me that the monuments in question are history, well what I just described is real history as well, and it is the searing truth.


Liked most of it but that's disappointing. MLK statues aren't symbols of plagiarism and adultery.

ETA: Also, Beauregard is the grandfather of civil rights.
This post was edited on 5/24/17 at 2:19 pm
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
51100 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 2:16 pm to
quote:

And it immediately begs the questions: why there are no slave ship monuments, no prominent markers on public land to remember the lynchings or the slave blocks; nothing to remember this long chapter of our lives; the pain, the sacrifice, the shame … all of it happening on the soil of New Orleans.


Civil Rights Museums don't count?
Posted by Luke
1113 Chartres Street, NOLA
Member since Nov 2004
13439 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 2:18 pm to
good question Mitch, why haven't those monuments been constructed by NOLA? Could it be those that advocate for such haven't contributed to the cost of doing such? The Confed monuments were not built with public funding btw...
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33744 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 2:19 pm to
quote:


Thoughts on Mayor Landrieu's speech before the removal of the monuments?
I think he makes some good points. I'd love to hear what others think of the speech.
I would say the remarks you quote are spot on. I'm sure you've seen the gentleman who put together funding for the lynching museum in Montgomery recently. I can't think of a more righteous memorial. However, the response on this board was predictably sad.
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
36485 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 2:19 pm to
Sorry, I'm more interested in actual results not smoke and mirror speeches. Speeches are for the easily swayed unwashed masses.
This post was edited on 5/24/17 at 2:21 pm
Posted by ibleedprplngld
Lafayette, LA
Member since Jan 2012
4323 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

There is a difference between remembrance of history and reverence of it. For America and New Orleans, it has been a long, winding road, marked by great tragedy and great triumph. But we cannot be afraid of our truth.


By the very nature of removing monuments from a time long past, we are actually being afraid of our truth and our history.
This post was edited on 5/24/17 at 2:21 pm
Posted by Carville
Sunshine, LA
Member since Jun 2014
5321 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 2:44 pm to
Umm, a huge Slave Market was a few blocks from the US Capital and was unaffected by the Emancipation Proclamation, which only freed slaves in the South.
Posted by Damone
FoCo
Member since Aug 2016
32966 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

And it immediately begs the questions: why there are no slave ship monuments, no prominent markers on public land to remember the lynchings or the slave blocks; nothing to remember this long chapter of our lives; the pain, the sacrifice, the shame … all of it happening on the soil of New Orleans.

Was there some law stopping people from making monuments like that?
Posted by Jcorye1
Tom Brady = GoAT
Member since Dec 2007
71687 posts
Posted on 5/24/17 at 2:51 pm to
I need to listen to the whole speech, but the part where makes the argument people are leaving because of statues is laughably bad.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram