Favorite team:LSU 
Location:Lafayette, LA
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:4763
Registered on:1/11/2012
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
I hate to say this, but I actually think Brian Kelly would be a solid gap fill for Michigan until they clear the hurdle of the Moore scandal.

He ended up not being what LSU paid for, but there is no doubt that he stabilized the program at a time when LSU needed it. Michigan is at a point where they desperately need to calm the waters and stabilize the program. I can't see any of the big name coaches touching that program with all shite flying around. Kelly could come in for 3-4 years and at least make things more palpable for the next big name that comes available down the road.
:lol:

Not with that offense against OSU.

re: Miami upsets Ohio State and UGA

Posted by ibleedprplngld on 12/21/25 at 10:04 am to
Nah, they’d have to score to upset either and their offense is atrocious.
Anyone who thought Kiffin leaving would impact Ole Miss vs TULANE is smoking some really good shite. They’ll win by 35+.

UGA may be a very different story though.
I don’t think either team has owned the other. This is a really shitty football, especially the offenses.
Doubt you get any argument. That was some Bama home cooking type shite.
quote:

Surely they fired their DC. Surely.


Nah, just their HC.
He’ll be the Aggie kicker by the 4th quarter at this rate.

re: Holy bad football

Posted by ibleedprplngld on 12/20/25 at 1:20 pm to
None of these kickers are gonna want to be in public for the next 3-5 months. Yikes
quote:

That's LSU's LDs should LSU fire him.


Incorrect. You should go read the contract.
quote:

Is this a precedent that will snowball?


I can see where this would benefit a smaller NIL program. I don't think larger programs would want to give away equity with deep pocket donors.
quote:

Brian. Kelly.


This would be absolutely incredible :lol:

re: Michigan legit candidates

Posted by ibleedprplngld on 12/11/25 at 8:41 am to
quote:

Don't know why Michigan would be more appealing than the jobs they already have.


I don't disagree. They're both in the top 10 from a comp perspective too.
quote:

So Bama only has to pay LSU $7million.


$7M for 2026 and then a decreased amount annually totaling in $72M for the life of the current contract.

If any school went after Kiffin, it would take at least $140M over the next 7 years to get him. Good fricking luck :lol:

Michigan legit candidates

Posted by ibleedprplngld on 12/11/25 at 8:32 am
Not sure who they are this point. Unfortunate for them, honestly.

That said, the last time they lost a coach they promoted Moore and that clearly hasn't worked out well (even before the fondling). So who can they legitimately chase at this point? DeBoer? Riley?
quote:

Just give it to me straight please!


Don't be a puss.

No one is hiring Kiffin away. There's an annual buyout that decreases over the life of the contract if Kiffin leaves. Starts $7M for 2026 and decreases each year after. Basically, if you hire Kiffin away, you'd have to fork out ~$20M a season to get him. That shite ain't happening anywhere.
quote:

I just want Tulane to be poised to make deep playoffs runs in the future when there is a G5 championship.


I'd love to see them upset Ole Miss. Especially with LK saga ongoing :lol:

Now, if we want to talk baseball..... they absolutely have an opportunity to be a contender year in and year out.
quote:

Really was hoping Delane would play..


Delane has absolutely nothing to gain by playing in this game. Houston wouldn't throw to his side of the field. Only thing he'd be doing is risking a freak injury that could derail him being a top 10 pick.
ND still has the fantasy that it's the 1980s and they're the face of college football when nothing could be further from the truth. They're not special. Join a fricking conference, play a challenging schedule, and stop bitching when you get left out. This superiority complex they have is nauseating.
quote:

I really think with their finances, recruiting blueprint etc. they could be elite on a consistent basis with proper vision and investment


Proud Tulane alum here (undergrad). It's been fun seeing them progress over the last 5-6 years into a strong G5 team. But the idea that they will ever be elite on the national stage is a stretch.

First, the academic standards alone make it extremely difficult to build a national brand with elite status. The closest we've seen an academic school come to pulling that off was Stanford back in the early 2000s/2010s. And their endowment is like 10x that of Tulane's.

Second, they are constrained geographically and that makes it extremely difficult to invest in facilities to compete with elite programs. Sure, they can upgrade, but there's very little room for expansion Uptown. It would be at the expense of student housing and/or student life investments for a school that consists of 80%+ out of state students.

To wrap this all up, as an alumni, I love seeing Tulane be successful. But they'll never be an elite program on the national stage. The best they can hope for is exactly what they're getting now. A strong showing in the G5 ranks and the occasional playoff bid where they more than likely get bounced in the first round.