Started By
Message

re: McKnight shooter released from custody...Cliffnotes of Normand press conf inside

Posted on 12/2/16 at 10:37 am to
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
36491 posts
Posted on 12/2/16 at 10:37 am to
quote:

quote:
dabigfella


You realize all your logic can also be used on the shooter?



he's already made it clear, in his own words, that he views this as a strictly black/white issue. You know, the race card.
Posted by Steadyhands
Slightly above I-10
Member since May 2016
6849 posts
Posted on 12/2/16 at 10:38 am to
quote:

Witnesses say he was the aggressor


Only statement I read said that the witness saw him speaking to him in a demeaning way after he shot him. That does not imply aggressor.. maybe he finished what started and got emotional..

quote:

Suggesting he's got more resources than the average perp in one of these situations is not far fetched.


Or maybe there are facts unknown to us that make it a self defense case.

I'm not saying he's innocent, but many are just going with guilty based on opinion. If he's been released, there must be a good reason.
Posted by roadGator
Member since Feb 2009
141556 posts
Posted on 12/2/16 at 10:38 am to
quote:

It is strange though considering all the witness statements seemed not to conflict


All the witness statements have been released already? WTF is going on down there?
Posted by Emiliooo
Member since Jun 2013
5148 posts
Posted on 12/2/16 at 10:39 am to
quote:

Jesus Christ emilio, then please do tell what you would do in that situation? Hide under the car seat and call 911?

If you brandish a gun, and whoever you brandish your gun at basically apologizes and the situation is diffused, then you get back in your car. You don't get trigger happy and pop him.
Posted by Scoop
RIP Scoop
Member since Sep 2005
44583 posts
Posted on 12/2/16 at 10:40 am to
I think what people are saying is that it would be very strange for a 50 year old, apparently somewhat successful business man to shoot someone with no good reason in cold blood in broad daylight. It doesn't add up and suggests there is more to the story.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
96699 posts
Posted on 12/2/16 at 10:40 am to
There is a huge difference between a witness willing to give there story to the police, and "witnesses" willing to talk to the media.


I have a feeling the ones that spoke with the police dont corroborate with the ones that ran to the media. That is the only way he would have been released.
Posted by TigahJay
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2015
10602 posts
Posted on 12/2/16 at 10:40 am to
quote:

Certain crimes, yes. And it's not by my logic, it is what the law is. See, I know it. Apparently you don't. I'm being factual. You're being knee jerkey and uninformed.

Not if the other person's life isn't in danger. I don't think the scenario you laid out justifies it.
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
59915 posts
Posted on 12/2/16 at 10:40 am to
quote:

All the witness statements have been released already?


they are going off of a witness that spoke to media and not police. in other words it may not be true
Posted by Meauxjeaux
98836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
40491 posts
Posted on 12/2/16 at 10:42 am to
quote:

I think there is something wrong with the system if we let murders walk on bail


No. Murderers go to prison. People accused of murder and still innocent until proven guilty may get out on bail.


Convicted murderers go to prison.

Accused murderers go to jail.

There is a difference. Learn it. Educate yourself. Argue from a stance of authority.
Posted by dabigfella
Member since Mar 2016
6687 posts
Posted on 12/2/16 at 10:42 am to
quote:

In most states those consequences are criminal intimidation.

Not sure what world you live in that beating your chest spewing hot air deserves being shot


you know i like you gene, but im saying you have here a scrawny 150 lb white guy and a 215 lb running back. Why on earth was joe mcknight even out of his car? Would he have gotten shot if he stayed in his car? If one was to speculate would the scrawny white guy get out of his car with the gun first then followed by mcknight getting out or would mcknight get out first then the man with the gun emerges? I dont know about you but if i see a guy with a gun emerge first, im driving through the red light.

At this point if mcknight got out first,then ron got out, what do you want ron to do. Mcknight was way bigger and possibly violent towards the smaller man. A gun is the equalizer, it sounds like when he pulled it, joe realized he had messed up by being a complete hotehead, which he showed during his time at USC and the Jets.

Again, I really could care less either way, but I hate that everyone brings race into the equation, this had nothing to do with race, it had to do with a smaller man, intimidated by a bigger man, and the smaller man had a gun. I just dont think this guy waited 54 years to start killing blacks, and I dont think that anyone would have died if both parties stayed in their cars but from how it sounds, mcknight got out first, I see no way a guy brandishing a gun got out first and mcknight got out too see whats up.
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
36491 posts
Posted on 12/2/16 at 10:43 am to
quote:

It doesn't add up and suggests there is more to the story.




Could be

quote:

a 50 year old, apparently somewhat successful business man


This really doesnt mean anything. Moderately successful people snap all the time. We don't know what makes this guy tick.
Posted by tgrbaitn08
Member since Dec 2007
146214 posts
Posted on 12/2/16 at 10:43 am to
quote:

It doesn't add up and suggests there is more to the story.



Thats what I'm waiting to hear.......no one has ruled out that Joe didnt have a gun IN his car...just that cops didnt find one outside the car
Posted by Pax Regis
Alabama
Member since Sep 2007
12988 posts
Posted on 12/2/16 at 10:44 am to
quote:

If you brandish a gun, and whoever you brandish your gun at basically apologizes and the situation is diffused, then you get back in your car. You don't get trigger happy and pop him.


The problem is you don't know for sure those are the facts. You may have read that on social media. You may have even read that was some witness (who declined to be identified) account in a news article. But you don't know those are the actual facts.

People lie. All. The. Time. They especially lie to suit their own biases and worldview. I don't know how many more examples of this we are going to need before people realize this.

If the law enforcement has released this guy without charging him you can bet your sweet arse this is not as cut and dry as these "witness" accounts make it. There is more to this that is not widely and publicly known.
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
36491 posts
Posted on 12/2/16 at 10:45 am to
quote:


Again, I really could care less either way, but I hate that everyone brings race into the equation, this had nothing to do with race, it had to do with a smaller man, intimidated by a bigger man, and the smaller man had a gun. I just dont think this guy waited 54 years to start killing blacks, and I dont think that anyone would have died if both parties stayed in their cars but from how it sounds, mcknight got out first, I see no way a guy brandishing a gun got out first and mcknight got out too see whats up.



quote:

you know i like you gene, but im saying you have here a scrawny 150 lb white guy and a 215 lb running back. Why on earth was joe mcknight even out of his car? Would he have gotten shot if he stayed in his car? If one was to speculate would the scrawny white guy get out of his car with the gun first then followed by mcknight getting out or would mcknight get out first then the man with the gun emerges? I dont know about you but if i see a guy with a gun emerge first, im driving through the red light.



You are too stupid to breathe. Eliminate yourself from the gene pool ASAP.
This post was edited on 12/2/16 at 10:47 am
Posted by Mr. Hangover
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2003
34521 posts
Posted on 12/2/16 at 10:45 am to
NOT PICKING SIDES HERE just trying to play devils advocate I guess, but I would venture to say that the witnesses automatically picked sides and MAY HAVE adjusted their stories accordingly...

A white guy shot a black guy in a predominately black area where people are always hanging out in their front yards (anyone who has been down behrman and holmes knows what I'm talking about)... let me be clear, I AM NOT SAYING THAT JOE DESERVED TO BE MURDERED, but to pass off 'eyewitness' testimony at this point seems kind of premature given the circumstances... it's really early in a process like this




With that being said, I hope that there is some concrete evidence, a traffic or surveillance camera maybe that caught the whole incident so if the POS shot him for no reason, he can get what he deserves
Posted by Steadyhands
Slightly above I-10
Member since May 2016
6849 posts
Posted on 12/2/16 at 10:46 am to
quote:

If that's the case, then does that justify him getting shot? So, every Tom, Dick, and Jane can straight up shoot someone every time a situation like this occurs? To me, that's just not right.


Defending your fellow citizens isn't right? So if I don't know someone causing serious harm to another person, than I should just mind my own business and let them be? Thank goodness you don't make the laws.
Posted by Meauxjeaux
98836 posts including my alters
Member since Jun 2005
40491 posts
Posted on 12/2/16 at 10:46 am to
quote:

Certain crimes, yes. And it's not by my logic, it is what the law is. See, I know it. Apparently you don't. I'm being factual. You're being knee jerkey and uninformed.

Not if the other person's life isn't in danger. I don't think the scenario you laid out justifies it.



That's not the law.

If I have reasonable belief that shooting the guy will stop the victim from death or great bodily harm, I walk. A 200 pound athletic male beating up a 125 pound female is a guaranteed walk.
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79659 posts
Posted on 12/2/16 at 10:46 am to
quote:

rt3


Thanks for your reply sir.

quote:

what led up to it is up for debate


Hence, why are people upset he wasn't charged? I have no opinion either way until the evidence comes out. Maybe the population is quick with the trigger finger no pun intended to indict people.
Posted by TigahJay
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2015
10602 posts
Posted on 12/2/16 at 10:47 am to
quote:

quote:
In most states those consequences are criminal intimidation.

Not sure what world you live in that beating your chest spewing hot air deserves being shot


you know i like you gene, but im saying you have here a scrawny 150 lb white guy and a 215 lb running back. Why on earth was joe mcknight even out of his car? Would he have gotten shot if he stayed in his car? If one was to speculate would the scrawny white guy get out of his car with the gun first then followed by mcknight getting out or would mcknight get out first then the man with the gun emerges? I dont know about you but if i see a guy with a gun emerge first, im driving through the red light.

At this point if mcknight got out first,then ron got out, what do you want ron to do. Mcknight was way bigger and possibly violent towards the smaller man. A gun is the equalizer, it sounds like when he pulled it, joe realized he had messed up by being a complete hotehead, which he showed during his time at USC and the Jets.

Again, I really could care less either way, but I hate that everyone brings race into the equation, this had nothing to do with race, it had to do with a smaller man, intimidated by a bigger man, and the smaller man had a gun. I just dont think this guy waited 54 years to start killing blacks, and I dont think that anyone would have died if both parties stayed in their cars but from how it sounds, mcknight got out first, I see no way a guy brandishing a gun got out first and mcknight got out too see whats up.

First off Mcknight is only listed as 5'11 205 online. Not exactly huge by any measure. Also Gasser's sister called him a "gentle giant" so he's not a 150lb scrawny white dude. Irregardless, once the gun came out and Joe was apologizing (allegedly) it should have been over.
This post was edited on 12/2/16 at 10:48 am
Posted by Mr. Hangover
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2003
34521 posts
Posted on 12/2/16 at 10:47 am to
quote:

he showed during his time at USC and the Jets



Link? You may be right but I don't remember this being the case
Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11 12 13 ... 98
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 98Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram