Started By
Message

re: Obtuse Batman V Superman: Dawn of Justice TD review thread (SPOILERS p5+)

Posted on 3/30/16 at 4:47 pm to
Posted by jeff5891
Member since Aug 2011
15761 posts
Posted on 3/30/16 at 4:47 pm to
quote:

I've seen the bootleg copy a couple of times
that doesnt couunt
Posted by 1999
Where I be
Member since Oct 2009
29241 posts
Posted on 3/30/16 at 5:04 pm to
I have heard quite a few people enjoy it on the rewatch.
This post was edited on 3/30/16 at 8:34 pm
Posted by abellsujr
New England
Member since Apr 2014
35633 posts
Posted on 3/30/16 at 5:09 pm to
There are some interesting points made in this interview that suggest that Lex was communicating with someone. Debora Snyder, Zack Snyder, and Charles Roven. Also more about what was going through Lex's mind. There were some Frankenstein undertones going on with creating Doomsday.

LINK
This post was edited on 3/30/16 at 6:38 pm
Posted by Bham4Tide
In a Van down by the River
Member since Feb 2011
22112 posts
Posted on 3/30/16 at 6:21 pm to
I finally watched it. Odd. Very odd.



Posted by stuckintexas
austin
Member since Sep 2009
2245 posts
Posted on 3/30/16 at 6:37 pm to
quote:

Odd. Very odd.

Too vague. We need to know how you felt about the Martha scene.
Posted by The Egg
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2004
79337 posts
Posted on 3/30/16 at 6:47 pm to
Posted by DAngelo
Los Angeles
Member since Mar 2016
22 posts
Posted on 3/30/16 at 7:06 pm to
DC has done a really good job casting imo but they royally screwed up with Ezra Miller
Posted by stuckintexas
austin
Member since Sep 2009
2245 posts
Posted on 3/30/16 at 7:22 pm to
Have an upvote
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
20563 posts
Posted on 3/30/16 at 7:25 pm to
quote:

You mind if I ask an honest question? For even those who seem to like the movie, the resounding line seems to be stuff like, "Well...it wasn't that bad" or at least muffled praise.

Why?
Simple answer for me: this was getting murdered in the opening critical reviews. Based on the RT score, I was thinking I was walking into a HORRIBLE movie.
quote:

Given they had these well known and epic heroes to work with, and clearly an unlimited budget (and three years from the release of MoS) what would have made this movie near the top of your comic book list, and why do you think they failed to do these things?
Superman is very hard to do within an extended universe. He can hear Lois cry out for help a continent away, and be there in a second. As displayed in this movie, he can take a nuke to the face and shake it off. Honestly, even that is a little depowered from my knowledge growing up of him, as he used to be able to fly into the heart of a supernova without issues.
Plus, he's a do-gooder, not a vigilante. Again as this film shows- "well, let me go fly to South America real quick and get those folks out of that burning building, I'll be right back".
In contrast, Batman improves with a realistic setting.

How do you reconcile the two? How does Superman allow crime to get so bad, and how does he allow Batman's brand of justice terrorism?
The film tried to address that;
he saved Lois from an African warlord, and there were repercussions afterwards towards the villagers. He would need to occupy the territory (like a 1 man peacekeeping force) to combat terrorism and enforce the peace, and that's a little to repressive for his tastes (and for society- they don't want Superman to enforce anything, they only want him to save them).
In fighting Zod (and likely Doomsday), there were collateral casualties. Again, this is presented in the film. And like our own reality, these collateral folks are bitter, and probably would like to sue. Hell, if Superman was real, there would likely be a huge stack of lawsuits, both legit and frivolous, and he won't/can't pay up. That then falls on the government, most likely, and that would lead to attempts of government control. Plus, the whole xenophobia and religious aspects- how many fundamentalists would scream that he's the Antichrist? He's not even really human. As the film states, he's proof that we are not alone, and that we're not particularly special.

I don't know how you go about making this a better film, and keep him in it.

For dramatic purposes, your hero needs a legitimate challenge. Someone has to face off against Superman, and not be squashed immediately. This film used the "kidnap mama as a hostage" device, to keep Lex from suffering the same fate as the African warlord. It worked per the script, I don't know how else you get Supes to behave.

Then, the Doomsday fight. Stronger, but dumber, than Superman. The kryptonite spear was the only option; ironically it's the one option Superman can't employ himself. He can't make it, and he couldn't wield it safely. Batman made it with Luthor's tech, and in theory Wonder Woman could have used it... but then we don't get the sacrifice.

A lot has been made of "Martha". It was a little clumsy, I definitely would have thought that set of lines would have been a priority to get right, from day 1. I buy the sentiment, but would definitely have liked to have it worded a little better.
I do buy the sentiment- Batman isn't an assassin, he's worked himself up to do this. He even made a point of talking ugly: "I'm sure your parents told you that you were special, but you're not... yada yada". I get this- Batman has to kill someone because they are too powerful and dangerous, not because they are a bad or evil person. Superman is finished, Batman has won, and Supes doesn't beg for mercy or say "frick you", he says that his mother is going to die because he didn't come out and kill Batman... and although that was his only option, he still wouldn't do it.
Hits a nerve in Batman. This super being is a decent guy, who refused to kill someone undeserving, even to save his own mother. The "Martha" namedrop triggers an emotional response in Bruce (a guy who's having tormented nightmares to this day about his parents' death, and who's been driven to become what he is due to it). Batman knows he would kill to save his own mother, if given the option... (just my take). So now, he's forced to come to grips with the fact that he's about to kill a better man than he is, in the name of "doing the right thing". He rejects that, and casts his lot with Superman.
*I think that was the intent. It certainly could have been done way more eloquently. It wasn't so mangled that I missed it.

So, DC is building a universe with multiple heroes, and this is the launch. As detailed above, the Superman issue hovers over everything, complicating it.

Remove Superman, and we get a GREAT Batman movie, with a believable actor, fantastic action, and some neat schemes. Alfred and Bruce are wonderful together, they are like a pair of rogue special agents. Alfred is the mentor, but looks like he could still wield a gun if need be. He needles Bruce about "growing up" as he's growing older, little comments about extending the Wayne line. Bruce talks about using "the suit" like it's some special commando gear, just a tool in his arsenal. He's still active, but jaded and wants a higher purpose.
I don't think they could have done the Batman action scenes any better, he is both an impressive fighter and a scary "devil"... something we haven't been shown until now, not at this level. He's fricking terrifying to the girls and the cops in that apartment building, and a straight up beast against Luthor's thugs.
I love this Batman, he's worth the price of admission, and God, I want more of him!

Wonder Woman- sleek, suave and stylish as Ms Prince. Very exotic, and capable of matching Bruce at his games of intrigue in the rich settings. She's like a Mossad agent, or a Bond girl (and not the helpless version). She fricking toys with Bruce. "Typical boy"...
And then she kicks into action- just WOW. If this were in Marvel's universe, she handles Tony Stark in the rich man world, and then goes a few rounds with Thor, and you're not sure who would win. If the gauntlets (forget the shield) deflect heat vision, I think they withstand anything else the comic book world has to throw at them.
And what comes across, is that she's enjoying fighting against Doomsday (who is stronger than Superman). "I've killed monsters from other worlds before", with a little smirk . No fear, she just chops off a fist, and intends to whittle his arse down. And don't let her get that lasso on you, it's all over then.

To me, this movie does it's job. It has enough action to justify the blockbuster title (and that's what comic book movies are, really). It gives us 2 really, really good new characters to go along with Superman (who's a little more fleshed out than he was in MOS).
And between Batman's nightmares and Lex's mirroring statements about the impending devils from the heavens, it sets the stage for something down the road, a reason to create more films.
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
20563 posts
Posted on 3/30/16 at 7:25 pm to
quote:

With this much interest, to me anyway, this ought to have been a slam dunk...
You'd hope for a slam dunk, but it's a different game than Marvel. Like we've all noted, Marvel is playing with a blank slate, there were very few diehard Thor, Iron Man or Captain America fans before this started.
DC has the icons. It can give them an advantage, but it can also go against them. Remember how many people were angry that Superman wasn't wearing red briefs over his suit? Nobody seemed to mind when Scarlet Witch was wearing some Goth clothes, instead of her comic book outfit. Could you imagine the fallout if Wonder Woman wasn't wearing something at least recognizable (and yet, we know that she can't wear the satin corset Lynda Carter did, it just isn't PC). Everything is going to be examined a lot closer with these characters. You could bomb, just with the wardrobe.
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
20563 posts
Posted on 3/30/16 at 7:47 pm to
quote:

stuckintexas
When you stated that you walked out in the middle, I responded that it sounded like you were looking for a reason to hate it.
Sorry, that sounds harsh and combative.

It's a comic book movie. A couple of things about those:

1) they are action flicks, of the fantasy variety. The biggest action scene is at the climax, the end. I've seen a few movies that made me laugh at their stupidity, but I waited around for the fireworks at the end... Arnold movies for example. You expect to get a good show, if nothing else. When the drama is lacking, all you have left is the explosive finale. You left before that happened.

2) Wasn't it a line from Watchmen- we're wearing latex suits and looking for trouble on the streets at 4 am, I don't think we're normal...?
I don't think of comic book movies (mainstream superhero films) as deep dramatic films. These are not normal people, it would be nice to identify at some level with them, but ultimately they are ... nuts. A lot of things they actually are, as characters, is crazy, so I try not to find too much deeper meaning in them. Same with good Bond movies, Star Wars, etc. You can usually rip these movies to shreds too, if you dig, but that destroys the fun of it all.

Effects have advanced to the point that these movies can look realistic, but they still ultimately aren't. If you force things too much, it can become pretentious and dragging. I felt TDKR went over the line there, and this one skirts around it at times. Interestingly, I think Batman is pulled back a lot (as opposed to TDKR), he's more of a fanciful character now. It's Superman that we have to fit into a drama.

Dude just wants to make Lois dinner, bring her flowers, and hop into the tub on top of her. That's his whole goal in life; but he knows he can fly off to Russia and rescue the astronauts in the capsule, or South America to fetch the people out of the burning building. He doesn't actively WANT to, but understands that he CAN, and it is the "RIGHT" thing to do, so he does. If I could, I guess I would too. I might rather hop in the sack with my babe, but damn it, I could keep some strangers alive instead.

And he catches flak for it.

If we go the ultra-realistic route, how many of us would walk into Congress and say "frick all of yall," at some point?

Posted by schexyoung
Deaf Valley
Member since May 2008
6537 posts
Posted on 3/30/16 at 7:55 pm to
Great explanation of the Martha moment, superman's selflessness, and its relation to Bruce's failure. It's what I was feeling and got a better sense of it on the second viewing, however I couldn't illustrate it as well with words as you did.
Posted by sorantable
Member since Dec 2008
48985 posts
Posted on 3/30/16 at 7:59 pm to
quote:

really good job casting imo but they royally screwed up with Ezra Miller


You don't know that yet. Tons of people said the same thing about Affleck. Give him a chance.
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
20563 posts
Posted on 3/30/16 at 9:26 pm to
quote:

I have heard quite a few people enjoy it on the rewatch
There's a ton of shite going on, very little is just filler. I plan on catching it again, and will get the blu-ray too (for that very purpose).

Spoilers actually helped me... not deep ones, but reading comments like "there are those dream sequences". I saw some still shots of the desert dream.
I would not have picked up the giant Omega symbol otherwise.

I didn't want to actually "spoil" the movie, just catch some tips on things to look for (for example, I steered clear of any ending surprises, so I wasn't sure if Superman was going to go down. However, I have a passing knowledge of what Doomsday did, so I suspected as much). So I don't even know what all I missed the first go-around.
For example, I wonder- Luthor's Asian chick sees Wayne by the server, then Prince gets his hacker gizmo. Prince is also aware of Luthor looking into her. The Asian girl is pretty unique looking... is she in league with Wonder Woman? Is that (one of) her info sources? Or did she just track Bruce down herself, and then steal the gizmo?

If the girl isn't with Wonder Woman, it seems odd that they'd show her finding Bruce, and nothing ever comes of it. They made a point of showing things, and having them mean something...
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
36178 posts
Posted on 3/30/16 at 10:47 pm to
quote:

If the girl isn't with Wonder Woman, it seems odd that they'd show her finding Bruce, and nothing ever comes of it. They made a point of showing things, and having them mean something...


The girl is Mercy, Luthor's assistant. Nothing comes of her finding Bruce because Luthor wanted Bruce to get the information and to steal the Kryptonite. It isn't coincidence that with all of the info that Bruce stole, there was nothing about the conspiracy to pit Batman and Superman against each other.
This post was edited on 3/30/16 at 10:50 pm
Posted by Scoob
Near Exxon
Member since Jun 2009
20563 posts
Posted on 3/30/16 at 10:54 pm to
quote:

The girl is Mercy, Luthor's assistant. Nothing comes of her finding Bruce because Luthor wanted Bruce to get the information and to steal the Kryptonite. It isn't coincidence that with all of the info that Bruce stole, there was nothing about the conspiracy to pit Batman and Superman against each other.
Cool, thanks.

Why would Luthor provide the intel on the meta-humans, though? He knew nothing of them, Wonder Woman or otherwise.

Was he hoping to trigger more paranoia and make Wayne more unstable?
Or if Batman won (and he did, he just didn't finish Supes off), he'd go after the others next?

As it turns out, he DOES go after the others, just not to kill them...
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
36178 posts
Posted on 3/30/16 at 11:05 pm to
quote:

Why would Luthor provide the intel on the meta-humans, though? He knew nothing of them, Wonder Woman or otherwise.


I don't know... maybe you pepper the files with other important files so that Batman doesn't become suspicious that he magically stole just the right stuff.

Mainly they're there for the fans. :)
Posted by Akit1
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Jul 2006
7645 posts
Posted on 3/30/16 at 11:09 pm to
Just saw it. I liked it. Enjoyed the story. Don't know about all the back stories of Wonder Woman and the Flash.

I liked the storyline on why Batman hated Superman. I liked the big fight, Doomsday and some of the nightmares.
Posted by stuckintexas
austin
Member since Sep 2009
2245 posts
Posted on 3/31/16 at 12:12 am to
quote:

When you stated that you walked out in the middle

When did I say that?
Posted by 3nOut
Central Texas, TX
Member since Jan 2013
29111 posts
Posted on 3/31/16 at 1:23 am to
Just saw it as well.

Loved Batman.
Liked Superman

Hated Batman fighting Superman.

I thought the buildup was freaking epic. It was actually a good reason for the movie.

Loved how they got there. Then the reason for the fight, the fight, and the reason they stopped fighting was moronic.
Jump to page
Page First 51 52 53 54 55 ... 74
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 53 of 74Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram