- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Gay Marriage Spinoff: Where should the new line be drawn on marriage?
Posted on 9/3/15 at 1:44 pm
Posted on 9/3/15 at 1:44 pm
It's obvious we've got a lot of gay marriage supporters in here. Which that's fine, that's your right. One thing I'd like to ask supporters of gay marriage though is this; Now that gay marriage is legal, what limits on marriage should be in place? Should it be limited by number, relation, age, or should there be no limits? Where should the new line on marriage be and what in your opinion validates that new line?
ETA: And for the record, I don't think the state should be in the marriage business to begin with.
ETA: And for the record, I don't think the state should be in the marriage business to begin with.
This post was edited on 9/3/15 at 1:45 pm
Posted on 9/3/15 at 1:45 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
Should it be limited by number, relation, age,
i don't really care
i do see marriage as a contract so the age limit should be the age of contracting (or done with approval from the minor and guardian)
but as long as the 2 people can contracct otherwise, i'm down
Posted on 9/3/15 at 1:45 pm to Darth_Vader
Able and willing to understand the contract to which one is entering. If you want to be married to six people and all agree, knock yourself out.
Posted on 9/3/15 at 1:46 pm to Darth_Vader
It should stop at a opussom. You shouldn't be able to marry opssums
Posted on 9/3/15 at 1:46 pm to Darth_Vader
If you're 18, want to get married, and not related to the point of breaking the law in that regard; there should be no stipulations.
Posted on 9/3/15 at 1:46 pm to Darth_Vader
same limits at a hetero marriage
maybe I'm not understanding the question
maybe I'm not understanding the question
Posted on 9/3/15 at 1:46 pm to Darth_Vader
Within 20 years, you will be able to marry your pet.
Posted on 9/3/15 at 1:46 pm to Darth_Vader
18 years old to do it by yourself. If not need parental or guardian consent.
Don't care who they marry, do what makes you happy. I live my life the way I want to, everyone else should as well.
I have yet to have anything happen to me where I go,"damn those gays really f*ucked this up."
Live life.
Don't care who they marry, do what makes you happy. I live my life the way I want to, everyone else should as well.
I have yet to have anything happen to me where I go,"damn those gays really f*ucked this up."
Live life.
Posted on 9/3/15 at 1:46 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:the part about butt sex
Gay Marriage Spinoff: Where should the new line be drawn on marriage?
Posted on 9/3/15 at 1:46 pm to Darth_Vader
Contracts between consenting adults.
I'm a lawyer. Let 8 people marry each other and share custody of one child.
Imagine how long and lucrative and drawn out those divorce and custody and alimony hearings would be.
I'm a lawyer. Let 8 people marry each other and share custody of one child.
Imagine how long and lucrative and drawn out those divorce and custody and alimony hearings would be.
Posted on 9/3/15 at 1:48 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
ETA: And for the record, I don't think the state should be in the marriage business to begin with.
Darth, I don't find myself agreeing with you often; however, THIS!!!
Posted on 9/3/15 at 1:50 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
I don't think the state should be in the marriage business to begin with.
This seems like a good place for us to draw the line.
Posted on 9/3/15 at 1:50 pm to Darth_Vader
Numbers of what, marriage licenses issued? That's dumb, it should be the same thing for same sex as it is for opposite sex marriages.
Posted on 9/3/15 at 1:53 pm to Darth_Vader
I feel like the line is here. I would have mocked you for being a dumb hick, except I was proven wrong when the SJW's shoved trannys down our throats and shoved the removing of 200 year old statues down our throats.
Maybe I'm the gullible one for being initially happy with the gay marriage ruling and the taking down of the confed. flag at SC. If I'd have known how far the SJW's and left would have pushed I'd have supported the conservative point of view maybe.
Maybe I'm the gullible one for being initially happy with the gay marriage ruling and the taking down of the confed. flag at SC. If I'd have known how far the SJW's and left would have pushed I'd have supported the conservative point of view maybe.
This post was edited on 9/3/15 at 1:54 pm
Posted on 9/3/15 at 1:53 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:If you're of age and doing something, like getting married, that doesn't affect me, I don't care. Have at it.
It's obvious we've got a lot of gay marriage supporters in here. Which that's fine, that's your right. One thing I'd like to ask supporters of gay marriage though is this; Now that gay marriage is legal, what limits on marriage should be in place? Should it be limited by number, relation, age, or should there be no limits? Where should the new line on marriage be and what in your opinion validates that new line?
Posted on 9/3/15 at 1:54 pm to Darth_Vader
Man and Woman
Man and Man
Woman and Woman
It's 2015, people have right to marry whoever they want. As long as both parties understand what they're getting themselves into and no close relation. If a gay couple wants to get married, it won't affect my life. It isn't the gays that are ruining the sanctity of marriage, it's the Kardashians.
Man and Man
Woman and Woman
It's 2015, people have right to marry whoever they want. As long as both parties understand what they're getting themselves into and no close relation. If a gay couple wants to get married, it won't affect my life. It isn't the gays that are ruining the sanctity of marriage, it's the Kardashians.
Posted on 9/3/15 at 2:06 pm to Darth_Vader
no goats...
or sheep
or any farm animals...
or sheep
or any farm animals...
This post was edited on 9/3/15 at 2:09 pm
Posted on 9/3/15 at 2:15 pm to Darth_Vader
quote:
I don't think the state should be in the marriage business to begin with.
This.
Posted on 9/3/15 at 2:20 pm to Darth_Vader
The only line(s) to be drawn on marriage should be age, incest and not under the influence of anything that could alter one's state of mind (alcohol, pills, etc.)
What validates it? Well age is validated by statutory rape. Incest leads to deformed kids, etc. and all that. The validation for rejecting anyone drunk, high, etc. is pretty self explanatory.
What validates it? Well age is validated by statutory rape. Incest leads to deformed kids, etc. and all that. The validation for rejecting anyone drunk, high, etc. is pretty self explanatory.
This post was edited on 9/3/15 at 2:22 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News