- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 9/1/14 at 10:34 pm to DByrd2
Did you watch the game?
He was horrible
He was horrible
Posted on 9/1/14 at 10:35 pm to DByrd2
Bruh, put that pipe down and get some sleep.
Posted on 9/1/14 at 10:35 pm to RummelTiger
quote:He was far more accurate with the ball than our pre-Mett QB. His receivers OTOH looked like they'd be good for 5.0 40 times . . . if they were running with a tail wind.
Dude, that guy sucked.
Posted on 9/1/14 at 10:36 pm to NC_Tigah
Negative.
Posted on 9/1/14 at 10:37 pm to DByrd2
quote:
Every pass the kid threw seemed to be highly accurate
What game were you watching?
Posted on 9/1/14 at 10:37 pm to NC_Tigah
If he was average we probably would have lost. Well below average.
Posted on 9/1/14 at 10:38 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
He was far more accurate with the ball than our pre-Mett QB.
And everybody says he sucks. McEvoy was terrible on any passes that traveled further than 5-7 yards.
Posted on 9/1/14 at 10:47 pm to DByrd2
quote:
Why does everyone assume that McEvoy sucked
I don't assume. What I saw with my own two eyes, and what his stat line confirms, showed me he sucked.
quote:
He only threw a few times before the half,
If by a few you mean over 50% of his attempts for the game, sure. He was 5/13 in the first half. One of those five was a pass that was deflected at the line and caught by a lineman for a loss of five yards. So I guess if you were going to be a "glass half full" kind of person, at least he really threw for 55 yards, not 50.
McEvoy had two passes the entire game that gained more than 10 yards. And I don't think he completed a throw that was more than 5 yards from the line.
He sucked, plain and simple. He missed a number of open receivers and threw 2 interceptions in the 4th quarter. He was certainly a large part of the comeback. Along with the defense keeping Wisconsin in 3rd and long situations most of the 2nd half.
quote:
Until then he was good though.
You and I clearly have different definitions of "good."
Posted on 9/1/14 at 10:55 pm to Wayne Campbell
Can you imagine if he was our QB? Half the fan base would have driven off the Mississippi bridge and the other half would be staked out at Miles house just waiting...
Posted on 9/1/14 at 11:09 pm to DByrd2
quote:
He isn't a bad passer
No he is a bad passer. He might have thrown 2 good passes. This does not a QB make. He sucked and on top of that his running was not that special. Wisconsin is in worse shape at QB then we were a few years ago--luckily they play in the B10.
Posted on 9/1/14 at 11:56 pm to dljtigers
From an objective viewpoint, he was bad.
Posted on 9/3/14 at 1:57 pm to DByrd2
Posted on 9/3/14 at 2:00 pm to DByrd2
quote:
Why does everyone assume that McEvoy sucked when discussing how we won?
Because he does?
Posted on 9/3/14 at 2:34 pm to harry coleman beast
If you take away the feel good of the comeback, and look at where LSU really is you would be concerned. I think has some huge holes and OL had better get their shite together quick.
Posted on 9/3/14 at 3:25 pm to TigerFanNKaty
Yes I wasn't expecting too much from our DTs and LBs, but damn our OL, TEs, and FB looked like crap. Really they had one good drive in the game. Other than that they made some big plays(Thank you Dural and Diarse). Who would have imagined our average per reception would be @ 25 YPC.
It was obvious all our blockers were totally confused for the far majority of the game.
It was obvious all our blockers were totally confused for the far majority of the game.
Posted on 9/3/14 at 3:27 pm to DByrd2
If Stave was healthy he would have played
Posted on 9/3/14 at 3:34 pm to DByrd2
No matter who we beat there is always an excuse. He was decent in the first half but the 4th quarter was a different story. Our team fought back and won a game that many thought was over at 24-7.
Posted on 9/3/14 at 3:48 pm to Topwater Trout
quote:
If Stave was healthy he would have played
Really?
[quote]That seemed weird to me, but then on Tuesday morning, the school sent out an official statement saying Stave and tight end T.J. Watt would "miss time due to injuries."
“Joel has been dealing with some issues with his throwing shoulder for the last couple of weeks and we have come to a decision, after talking with Joel, that the best thing for him right now is to shut it down and give him some rest," Andersen said in the statement. "It was a tough decision because Joel is a great competitor and has a tremendous desire to help this team. We will continue to monitor his progress but we’re not putting a timetable on his return at this time.”
Case closed, right? Not so fast.
Reporters attending the end of practice on Tuesday night found out Stave wasn't hurt. Andersen backtracked from the statement put out just a few hours earlier (Listen to audio from Andersen and Stave here).
"He has not re-injured anything," Andersen said. "When he gets himself to the point where he's ready to play, he'll be ready to play. 'Injured' is probably a bad word, I guess, of choice by me that I decided to use in the press release."[/quote]
ESPN
Posted on 9/3/14 at 4:24 pm to SabiDojo
ESPN was reporting he was throwing ducks in pregame warmups saturday...i think the shoulder is an issue
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News