- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: BLM now taking land from TX rancher....but he owns his land - UPDATED
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:46 pm to PigglyWiggly
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:46 pm to PigglyWiggly
quote:
This sounds so ridiculous I have to believe that the website is mischaracterizing what is going on
God I hope so...
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:46 pm to Yat27
quote:
really shitty Chinese made sarcasm meters.
They're solar powered bruh. They don't work at night.
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:46 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
No. Seriously, WTF did he do to earn that land besides being born?
Does it really matter how he got the land, as long as it was legal?
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:46 pm to Yat27
Rex does a good job of keeping me out of here for the most part so not sure who is got a lick of sense or not.
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:47 pm to GumboPot
You guys are too easy. I'm the guy who doesn't even think women should be allowed to vote. Do you really think I'm on the government's side here?
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:48 pm to Yat27
Am I the only one that thinks the shite is about to hit the fan????? These guys are pushing around the wrong people and I think what has been being said about people are getting tired of being fricked with is about to come to a boil.
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:50 pm to Traffic Circle
quote:
Maybe houses in St. George will get confiscated because the title is recorded in Baton Rouge?
Get that shite out of here. It has nothing to do with this discussion.
Is this story for real? How can they justify this. Meant for the rational, non St George idiots that feel the need to insert their bull shite into every thread.
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:53 pm to GRITS79
quote:
Meant for the rational, non St George idiots
I have no dog in that fight, but you don't exactly seem like an unbiased observer.
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:54 pm to Scruffy
quote:
That person will be deemed a Rex.
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:55 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
quote:
his 90,000 acre ranch
Does any one person really need that much land all to themselves.
Henderson doesn't have 90,000 acres. That's what happens when a story gets passed from one blog to another to another to another.
This post was edited on 4/15/14 at 9:59 pm
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:57 pm to Yat27
I have no dog in the fight either. But most of this guys/girls posts revolve around St George. It's absurd, and has absolutely nothing to do with this story.
I couldn't care less about St George, but I own a gun, a house, and I have a job and I pay taxes and I don't like what our government has become. My feelings have nothing to do with St George.
I couldn't care less about St George, but I own a gun, a house, and I have a job and I pay taxes and I don't like what our government has become. My feelings have nothing to do with St George.
Posted on 4/15/14 at 9:57 pm to NHTIGER
9, 9K, 9 million, doesn't matter. frick THE GOV.
Posted on 4/15/14 at 10:04 pm to GeauxxxTigers23
Im pretty much assuming you hit the sarcasm button. Believe it or not 90,000 acre ranch is just a mid size ranch up here in Montana and if the man has a lot of cattle , he certainly needs that many acres.
Posted on 4/15/14 at 10:07 pm to windhammontanatigers
Just went back up and read where I was right with your sarcasm. Touche'
Posted on 4/15/14 at 10:09 pm to GREENHEAD22
So, according to the Constitution (for whatever that's worth these days) the state legislatures must approve the federal acquisition of the property (not even considering that it's private property to begin with). But since the semantics of the land surrounding a river - due to the river changing course over time - the feds see an opportunity to land grab without having to deal with the states. shite, every river or stream in the U.S. is open game then.
The more I read about the BLM the more it seems that entire agency's existence is blatantly unconstitutional.
The more I read about the BLM the more it seems that entire agency's existence is blatantly unconstitutional.
Posted on 4/15/14 at 10:11 pm to Mohican
quote:
The more I read about the BLM the more it seems that entire agency's existence is blatantly unconstitutional.
I agree. And, IMO, our elected officials don't give a rats arse about the constitution.
Posted on 4/15/14 at 10:14 pm to Mohican
I expect them to go back to the Nevada before this is all said and done. This case however I cant see them winning, especially when the state backs the rancher. If they do shite will blow up.
Posted on 4/15/14 at 10:19 pm to GREENHEAD22
I 100% expect them to go back to Nevada. Mr Bundy's troubles aren't over.
But Texas is a totally different ball game. If he owns the land, and the state backs him, how is this legal? I realize that legal doesn't mean much to our current administration, but still....
I'm trying to find more info on this right now. I just don't see how this will fly.
But Texas is a totally different ball game. If he owns the land, and the state backs him, how is this legal? I realize that legal doesn't mean much to our current administration, but still....
I'm trying to find more info on this right now. I just don't see how this will fly.
Posted on 4/15/14 at 10:19 pm to CptBengal
The BLM just messed with Texas.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News