Started By
Message

re: Who was the better Coach, Dinardo vs. Archer, my first post

Posted on 6/22/13 at 11:59 am to
Posted by Mr.Perfect
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2013
17444 posts
Posted on 6/22/13 at 11:59 am to
I loved Mike Archer. Great person. Did not hace the coaching ability, but a wonderful dad and friend
Posted by CharlesLSU
Member since Jan 2007
31964 posts
Posted on 6/22/13 at 12:15 pm to
Archers recruiting was not bad. 1987 class was decent and the 1988 class pulled in almost every top talent in the state of Louisiana and rated the 4th best class in the nation by Emfinger and top 10 by a young Tom Lemming.

Remember, the poor development by coaches of those recruits had a great deal to do with them being labeled failures.
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
51646 posts
Posted on 6/22/13 at 12:22 pm to
This is a serious question?
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89812 posts
Posted on 6/22/13 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

Did you not see the list earlier of Hallman talent?


I did. I was in school during that time. We had about 12 legitimate ball players when Dinardo was hired.

I'm looking at the 1994 list...

I see Cleveland, Faneca, Raion Hill, Arnold Miller (who had to resign with GD, anyway), Richey, Eric Smith and Troy Twillie as guys that leap out in a good way.

1993, I see Kennison, Kessler, Mixon,(ETA Rogers), Stansberry, Denard Walker and Wiley

To heck with it, 1992, Gillyard, Tory James, Northern, Toomer, Sheddrick Wilson

I'm sorry, I just don't see it - I watched those guys play a lot of games. They are my boys. And I love every LSU player, but just Dinardo's 1999 class is qualitatively as good as perhaps Hallman's last three. His 1996 class was loaded with talent, but very little of it actually panned out. 1997 was very, very solid (and better than all of the Hallman classes, as well), and formed the senior nucleus of the 2000 team that ultimately turned everything around.

1992 was arguably Hallman's best recruiting class - and it was perhaps on par with Dinardo's worst classes, 1996 and 1998.

Guy couldn't recruit, couldn't coach, couldn't talk, couldn't think and couldn't win a game to save his life (but won 1 to save his job - that one time).

Glad he's gone.

(ETA: And Faneca, Kennison, Northern, Rogers and Stansberry are some of my very favorite players of all time.)
This post was edited on 6/22/13 at 12:33 pm
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
51646 posts
Posted on 6/22/13 at 12:32 pm to
Difference was Dinardo could win with Hallman's players but Hallman couldn't win with anything ARcher left. Hell, Hallman couldn't win with anything now that I think about it. I give him an edge over Archer because he left more talent than did Archer.

Dinardo could recruit. Remember, LSU had the WORST defense in its history under Tepper. How many NFL draftees were on that defense? Tells you the problem wasn't the recruiting.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89812 posts
Posted on 6/22/13 at 12:34 pm to
quote:

Dinardo could recruit. Remember, LSU had the WORST defense in its history under Tepper.


He could recruit and was not a liability in helping coach the offense. Losing Carl Reese to Texas ultimately cost Dinardo the job.
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59196 posts
Posted on 6/22/13 at 12:43 pm to
quote:

Absolutely disagree with this. It's only half the equation. The other half is taking maximum advantage of the talent you now have and making them play to their true potential


Except you can't do the 2nd part without the first. Getting the talent first is absolutely the most important part.

quote:

via creative play calling. There's been a long run of (offensive) talent-squandering in recent years at LSU. And don't give me that 10-Win BS


This thread is about DiNardo and Archer, save your Miles bashing for another thread. Not many would disagree that the offense as been bad in recent years and while there was a good deal of talent at some positions, it's been lacking at others most prominently the most important position.
Posted by H-Town Tiger
Member since Nov 2003
59196 posts
Posted on 6/22/13 at 1:02 pm to
quote:

Faneca


WE only got him because the OL coach Hallman hired, Larry Zeirlien long time coach with U Houston and had coached HS in that area. 1 of his sons is HS coach that coached in that area as well.

Hallman did recruit some decent talent but not as much as DiNardo.
Posted by LSU GrandDad
houston, texas
Member since Jun 2009
21564 posts
Posted on 6/22/13 at 1:20 pm to
quote:

Where you could debate is who was worse out of Archer and Hallman, but DiNardo was much, much better than either.


this. if he could have picked asst.s he would have had a long career at lsu.
Posted by King Joey
Just south of the DC/US border
Member since Mar 2004
12513 posts
Posted on 6/22/13 at 1:27 pm to
DiNardo. Not even close. In all respects, but most especially in long term impact on the program. Gerry DiNardo literally saved LSU Football from the abyss. Hands down better than Archer, who tipped us towards that abyss in the first place.

Anyone who suggests otherwise either wasn't there for the Archer years or is too scarred by the last two DiNardo years to consider the question objectively.

Posted by EvrybodysAllAmerican
Member since Apr 2013
11288 posts
Posted on 6/22/13 at 1:28 pm to
What makes hallmans recruiting more impressive is that he signed those guys while going 5-6, 2-9 out of the gate and they were just as bad before he got here. Dinardo went 9-3 and 10-2 in his first 2 years. That had to have helped recruiting those early saban teams.

No doubt Dinardo was a better coach ( I still like him a lot) I'm just trying to give hallman credit for possibly the only thing he did do well. He left enough talent on the team that Dinardo could win quickly. Dinardo did the same for saban but that is more than you can say for archer.
This post was edited on 6/22/13 at 1:34 pm
Posted by King Joey
Just south of the DC/US border
Member since Mar 2004
12513 posts
Posted on 6/22/13 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

LSU BOS gave him a shot to get rid of Tepper before 99 and he declined.
Heck, I think he had more chances than that. I still believe that he might have kept his job after the Houston debacle if he would have told Emmert he was firing Tepper (though I suspect Emmert already had his heart set on Saban).

Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89812 posts
Posted on 6/22/13 at 1:54 pm to
quote:

Dinardo did the same for saban but that is more than you can say for archer.


Archer was a better coach than Hallman, though. I hope you're not arguing the opposite here.
Posted by tigger1
Member since Mar 2005
3477 posts
Posted on 6/22/13 at 2:03 pm to
Prop 48 killed Louisiana recruiting as it did many states. But La was hit harder than most, first the talent level was down in the mid to late 80's.


Bill left LSU with a thin secondary and DL, Young from SMU helped a great deal in the secondary. But our three main recruits one year all could not move up to the college level and start in the key year of Archer's recruiting.

Our best OL quit football and he would have been a great pro.

Archer is a better coach than Dinardo, Dinardo hired into a strong team only lacking a few players, and recruiting talent was on a high level again.

Posted by tigerfan0082
Member since Oct 2011
676 posts
Posted on 6/22/13 at 2:12 pm to
Dinardo had a better restaurant?

LSU vs UF 1997!!! Huge game after the Hallman years! I give nod to GD just for that win!
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89812 posts
Posted on 6/22/13 at 2:27 pm to
quote:

Archer is a better coach than Dinardo, Dinardo hired into a strong team only lacking a few players, and recruiting talent was on a high level again.


I'm not completely on board with this, although I agree that Prop 48 and Arnsparger's relatively poor recruiting (relative to the product he put on the field - the guy was a great Xs and Os coach, maybe the best LSU ever had) did not set the table for Archer to succeed and I've defended him as being awfully young for the job - he was the players' selection and that's always a red flag.

Having said that, Dinardo was an excellent (perhaps not outstanding) head coach (while I have lauded Archer's abilities as a LB coach and coordinator earlier in this thread) that we caught at his absolute peak of ability. Him following Hallman would be like somebody inheriting an acting role from Shia Labeouf - he would look like Lawrence Olivier, by comparison. I recognize that, but I still believe he was a better overall head coach than either Archer or Hallman.

But, then again, I was a better head coach of LSU than Hallman, although I never held the position and I'm wholly unqualified for any position in athletics.

ETA: And Hallman left Dinardo about 13 or 14 ballplayers - some of them the best ever at their position (Alan Faneca comes to mind), but a relatively shallow team, which Dinardo made a contender immediately by recruiting Kevin Faulk.
This post was edited on 6/22/13 at 2:29 pm
Posted by madddoggydawg
Metairie
Member since Jun 2013
6574 posts
Posted on 6/22/13 at 2:49 pm to
quote:

scarred by the last two DiNardo years

well it did do some damage i'll never recover from...

in hindsight i'm not sure how i came back every week when we could hang with any team in the nation (even in 99) only to lose seemingly every sec game on the final drive..

the horror:

Oct 3, 1998 #12 Georgia 28, #6 LSU 27 ("stick with the run!")
Oct. 17, 1998 Baton Rouge, La. Kentucky 39, #21 LSU 36
Oct. 31, 1998 Oxford, Miss. Ole Miss 37, LSU 31
(this is my vote for worst, since we looked like we had come back the week before when we crushed a ranked MSU 41-6. in oxford, my ole miss buddy told me "yea, y'all might really kick our arse", then asking me "what happened?" at halftime b/c the rebs went up 28-10 against tepper's d, only to have us score 21 in the 4th and lose in OT.)
Nov. 7, 1998 Baton Rouge, La. Alabama 22, LSU 16
Nov. 21, 1998 Notre Dame, Ind. #10 Notre Dame 39, LSU 36

Oct. 2, 1999 Athens, Ga. #10 Georgia 23, LSU 22
(was at this one too, although it seemed like a moral victory b/c josh booty was gonna be our new star qb)
Oct. 23, 1999 Starkville, Miss. #12 Mississippi State 17, LSU 16
Nov. 6, 1999 Tuscaloosa, Ala. #12 Alabama 23, LSU 17 (throw it, josh, throw it)

8 1-score games in 2 years... 0 wins
Posted by tigger1
Member since Mar 2005
3477 posts
Posted on 6/22/13 at 3:15 pm to
Ace Midnight,
If you get a chance look at the LSU depth chart starting in 1979-1990, the big drop is in 1987 and the biggest in 1988. The key recruiting years of 85-86-87 and 88 play a major factor in the drop in talent on the LSU team, we are thin in 89 and 90. By 1989 LSU is in trouble at a number of positions.
But by 1990 the talent level in state is on the raise and Hallman then goes out and loses a number of key Louisiana players who become All American's on out of state teams. But he still brings in better overall talent than we got between 86 and 89.
Bill's lack of strong recruiting cost us on the DL and secondary and it really told on the 88 and 89 teams (just think how bad it would have been without Young).
Dinardo is here for 1 of the best classes ever out of Louisiana and 3 good classes.

Posted by roygu
Member since Jan 2004
11718 posts
Posted on 6/22/13 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

Archer was just too young IMO. He also had this crazy idea that he couldnt compete with the Miami's and florida states of the world with Louisiana talent. So he went to houston and signed a bunch of players who didn't pan out for whatever reason.


This, plus there was a guy named George Eames, if I remember correctly, who was trying to make his mark as a civil rights leader, who did everything that he could to destroy LSU's recruiting at the time. That was too big of an obstacle for a green coach to overcome when recruiting against Bowden, Spurrier, and Miami..
Posted by jrevonte
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2011
1801 posts
Posted on 6/22/13 at 4:03 pm to
The same! They both loss and they loss often
This post was edited on 6/22/13 at 4:04 pm
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram