Started By
Message

re: Who thinks Emmitt Smith is the best running back ever?

Posted on 8/11/10 at 9:22 am to
Posted by bomber77
Member since Aug 2008
14783 posts
Posted on 8/11/10 at 9:22 am to
quote:

Sayers is #5 at worst.I would put OJ ahead of Dickerson.


Agree in fact Id put OJ in the top 5. Any list without Jim Brown as #1 is incorrect.
Posted by Ford Frenzy
337 posts
Member since Aug 2010
6876 posts
Posted on 8/11/10 at 9:23 am to
Pierre Thomas > Emmitt
Posted by iwyLSUiwy
I'm your huckleberry
Member since Apr 2008
34828 posts
Posted on 8/11/10 at 9:25 am to
quote:

but his stunt going to Arizona and breaking the record pretty much soured me on him.


and your disqualified from the conversation
Posted by tubucoco
las vegas, nevada
Member since Oct 2007
32994 posts
Posted on 8/11/10 at 9:27 am to
him standing there bragging he is the best rushin RB ever soured me! guess I'm disqualified, also!
Posted by Tiger Ryno
#WoF
Member since Feb 2007
103316 posts
Posted on 8/11/10 at 9:30 am to
quote:

the team he played for makes a HUGE difference in those stats and hardware


take him away and that team wouldn't have been great at all, just merely good and probably never wins a SB.

Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
51630 posts
Posted on 8/11/10 at 9:37 am to
stats do make a difference.

Let me see, Jim Brown had highest yards per carry, highest yards per game, and NEVER missed a single game. Eight rushing titles. Rules favored defenses. Clotheslining was legal when he played. 12,000 yards on 12 and 14 game seasons and 1-2 game postseasons.

He won a ring in a league dominated by the Colts, Packers, and Giants. He retired after 9 seasons, didn't hang around like Emmitt did padding the stats. Emmitt didn't strike fear into defenders and opposing coaches the way Jim Brown did.
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
51630 posts
Posted on 8/11/10 at 9:38 am to
actually that is what I've always said about Aikman. I've always thought Aikman was overrated.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
204332 posts
Posted on 8/11/10 at 9:48 am to
quote:

take him away and that team wouldn't have been great at all, just merely good and probably never wins a SB.



I agree with this. If he is on ZONA every year. He doesn't touch 10,000 yds.
Posted by givemeabeer
Member since Mar 2006
3306 posts
Posted on 8/11/10 at 10:41 am to
Anyone with any sense knows that Barry Sanders would have shattered the record and put it so far out of reach that nobody would even sniff it again, had he not retired so early.

Truth.

And, if Sanders and Smith switched teams, where would their respective stats be? Sanders would have been even better, and a Super Bowl winner, because there were other weapons, a great QB, and a great OL, as well as great coaching. Smith on the Lions? Good luck with that.

For my money it's between Sanders, Jim Brown, and Walter Payton as best ever.
Posted by Michael J Cocks
Right Here
Member since Jun 2007
47153 posts
Posted on 8/11/10 at 10:55 am to
quote:

Who thinks Emmitt Smith is the best running back ever?


I haven't bothered reading this thread but my opinion on Emmitt(and I'll just say up front he's my 2nd favorite football player all time(not just RB) and I have him ranked behind Walter Payton as my favorite)....anyway, Emmitt is the biggest overachiever ever. He isn't the best at any particular category that makes a RB "Great", except maybe his durability, toughness and vision. He wasn't the fastest, most explosive, quickest, shiftiest, strongest etc. etc. But he used every tool he had to work for him, he was a great student of the game and had arguably the biggest heart anyone's ever seen.

So based on all the intangibles, IMHO he is one of the top 3 RB's all time. Barry Sanders and a few others that get mentioned in this conversation had a lot of what if's....Emmitt just straight did that shite. No one can take away his accomplishments.
Posted by Michael J Cocks
Right Here
Member since Jun 2007
47153 posts
Posted on 8/11/10 at 10:56 am to
quote:

I think he is the biggest gravy trainer ever....not so bad that he followed one of the best offensive lines in NFL history, but his stunt going to Arizona and breaking the record pretty much soured me on him.


lolz. I love when people say this ignorant shite.
Posted by Michael J Cocks
Right Here
Member since Jun 2007
47153 posts
Posted on 8/11/10 at 11:03 am to
quote:

take him away and that team wouldn't have been great at all, just merely good and probably never wins a SB.


totally agree Ryno. Remember the year after they won the first Superbowl and he missed the first 2 games(93)...they lost those first 2 games pretty bad. Also everyone was saying during his contract dispute that Derek Gainer was just as good as Emmitt and with all the studs Dallas already had, Emmitt was irrelevant, he was just a product of a good system and a shite ton of talent around him. Well we saw it takes a little bit more to be successful in that system than just running behind a big offensive line. Also other pretty decent backs came in like Blair Thomas and Emmitt just shite all over them, made them look retarded. People always use the OL argument and it's gotten ridiculous over the years. That dude was a beast and constantly pushed the pile and made plays while he was beat the frick up.

quote:

Anyone with any sense knows that Barry Sanders would have shattered the record and put it so far out of reach that nobody would even sniff it again, had he not retired so early.


anyone with any sense knows that "What If's" are the dumbest fricking arguments to be made in football. He DIDN'T do it. So you can never say he would have. He also could have fricked up his knee on the first play of that season he retired prematurely.

quote:

For my money it's between Sanders, Jim Brown, and Walter Payton as best ever.


Yes, all 3 of those guys were the most talented RB's to play the game. But when it's all been said and done, Emmitt ranks right up there.
Posted by Maximus
Member since Feb 2004
81266 posts
Posted on 8/11/10 at 11:31 am to
quote:

Any list without Jim Brown as #1 is incorrect.


your opinion carries so much weight since you think in every single one of these threads that the best ever has played for the Browns or Ohio State
Posted by Suntiger
BR or somewhere else
Member since Feb 2007
33037 posts
Posted on 8/11/10 at 11:43 am to
quote:

Who thinks Emmitt Smith is the best running back ever?


I'd have to put him behind Barry Sanders for sure.

Here's my question. Was Emmitt better than Bo Jackson. I know Bo got injured and had a shorter carreer, but he was awesome when he played.
Posted by Baloo
Formerly MDGeaux
Member since Sep 2003
49645 posts
Posted on 8/11/10 at 12:30 pm to
Reading this thread makes one thing clear: Emmit Smith is at the very least the most underrated back ever. Some of the names being tossed out as his equal are simply absurd. Pierre Thomas? Even Earl Campbell.

consistency is the #1 thing you need from a running back. It is also the least appreciated skill. I'd still rank Brown and Payton as 1 and 2, but I'd actually rank Emmitt #3.

And I friggin HATE the Cowboys. I don't think Michael Irvin has any business being in the Hall of Fame. He's the guy who benefited from have awesome teammates. But Emmitt was a workhorse back who simply got 4 yards every single time.
Posted by SJS Eagle 85
P-Town
Member since Apr 2009
5007 posts
Posted on 8/11/10 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

anyone with any sense knows that "What If's" are the dumbest fricking arguments to be made in football. He DIDN'T do it.
This is ignoring the fact that Barry outplayed Emmit. He finished his career with a better ypc, better ypg, more 20+ and 40+ runs in less games, and fumbled less. All this behind a shite line with no HOF QB and no HOF WR. Just because Emmitt played longer doesn't make him better. Just means he played longer.

That said, I do respect what Emmitt accomplished in his career. But he was never the RB Barry Sanders was.
Posted by Michael J Cocks
Right Here
Member since Jun 2007
47153 posts
Posted on 8/11/10 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

Reading this thread makes one thing clear: Emmit Smith is at the very least the most underrated back ever. Some of the names being tossed out as his equal are simply absurd. Pierre Thomas? Even Earl Campbell.

consistency is the #1 thing you need from a running back. It is also the least appreciated skill. I'd still rank Brown and Payton as 1 and 2, but I'd actually rank Emmitt #3.

And I friggin HATE the Cowboys. I don't think Michael Irvin has any business being in the Hall of Fame. He's the guy who benefited from have awesome teammates. But Emmitt was a workhorse back who simply got 4 yards every single time.


Thank You!
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
167136 posts
Posted on 8/11/10 at 1:17 pm to
Mario Bates was as good as Emmitt Smith. Mario just didn't play for the Cowboys.
Posted by Michael J Cocks
Right Here
Member since Jun 2007
47153 posts
Posted on 8/11/10 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

Mario Bates was as good as Emmitt Smith. Mario just didn't play for the Cowboys.


it's already been brought up. Several backs were brought in to spell Emmitt and none of them could do what he did, although several people swore it was a job anyone could do. shite like this makes me laugh very fricking hard.
Posted by tigerdup07
Member since Dec 2007
21979 posts
Posted on 8/11/10 at 1:19 pm to
i always said that bo was. if he wouldn't have gotten injured, he would have went down as the best, imo.

first pageprev pagePage 4 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram