Can NIL money be taken away?

Easy 50 downvotes based on retard level alone

quote:

---

If the player is essentially a bust, can the payment be cancelled?

---

Essentially no, NIL is paid from contracts to 3rd parties. Pay for play or performance is prohibited. You can withdraw renewals if a player did not merit a new contract. So it depends on how the contracts are structured.

I wonder if NIL could be based upon something similar to the tour de france or Nascar sponsorships where the amount of time you are in the lead or actual time on TV is a factor. Whereby if someone fails to play, they aren't on the field or on TV so their NIL decreases.

In the NFL they have fines for being late to meetings, conduct detrimental to the team, and other issues. The CBA negotiates them, but it is to hold them accountable.

I'm guessing in some ways it can because glasscock mentioned fining guys that are late for meetings, practice etc but no not for being a straight up bust

In other words.....all they gotta do is SHOW UP and spit!

The ENTIRE PROCESS SUCKS!!!!!!!!!!

That's why I prefer the handshake deals. If you don't produce, no handshake.

quote:

---

I wonder if NIL could be based upon something similar to the tour de france or Nascar sponsorships where the amount of time you are in the lead or actual time on TV is a factor. Whereby if someone fails to play, they aren't on the field or on TV so their NIL decreases.

---

This would create a total shite storm of negative publicity that would be an incredible impediment to recruiting. It could also raise issues and result in litigation if a player alleges a coach was ordered to reduce his playing time to save money.

That's why I said "on paper." Also, that's why you see one year deals. Your performance determines next year's NIL deal. This year's is in the bag.

No but they do have wording that likely gives the NIL sponsors an out or a way to possibly sue if they feel their contracts are violated. You've already seen several attempting to do this because they felt a breach of contract trying to get out of NIL deals. You just saw it with Washington's QB who was heavily rumored to be going to LSU. They threatened to sue him because he voided the NIL contract yet they say it's not pay for play? lol.

While they can't do pay for play don't think for a second most when they slap these booster allied third-party NIL deals they're thinking of anything else other than pay for play. It's all on how smart the NIL deals are drawn up contract and wording wise.

You can easily tell who's not the smart ones when someone leaves a university, they get pissy about it, then try to make them honor NIL deals by showing up for commercials halfway across the country while at another university lol. Anyone smart drawing that contract up would have an easy out for both sides with mutual parting.

Speaking of the Washington QB that has to be an awkward locker room right now. The coach was being whiny about it and the university basically jailed the QB into staying. If the guy didn't want to be there they should've just let him go then seek legal means to go after him for violations. You didn't need to make that a public PR nightmare. Not a good look for the QB or university.