- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
3rd world migration
Posted on 4/13/26 at 9:23 am
Posted on 4/13/26 at 9:23 am
Wouldn't it make more sense to spend money and effort to help develop the 3rd world countries instead of just bring a few of their people to western nations? I would actually be down to support investment in south America and strengthen our economic ties to the region. I don't see many liberals volunteering to open medical practices or provide construction services to developing nations. I don't see Disney opening a theme park in Nairobi. I dont see all the pride flag flying corporations sourcing their ingredients from central america to help local farmers.
18
Posted on 4/13/26 at 9:24 am to theliontamer
quote:we tried that for almost 20 years. Didn’t work out. Just leave them over there and let them fight amongst themselves.
Wouldn't it make more sense to spend money and effort to help develop the 3rd world countries instead of just bring a few of their people to western nations?
This post was edited on 4/13/26 at 9:25 am
Posted on 4/13/26 at 9:24 am to theliontamer
quote:
Wouldn't it make more sense to spend money and effort to help develop the 3rd world countries instead of just bring a few of their people to western nations?
The last time this was tried it was demonized as "colonization" and rejected.
Posted on 4/13/26 at 9:29 am to theliontamer
quote:yes, but we tried. But no we should not bring in 3rd world miliatary aged men that stand at attention at the american border.
Wouldn't it make more sense to spend money and effort to help develop the 3rd world countries instead of just bring a few of their people to western nations?
quote:do it cheaply since bad regimes can syphon the money toward tunnels and shite.
I would actually be down to support investment in south America and strengthen our economic ties to the region.
At some point, the military aged men need to change their country instead of ours. SO YOU ARE RIGHT, but i cannot hold my breath for sea change in the psyche of mass populations that cannot overthrow tyrants.
...ETA>. Actually, Henry Jones says what I said, but in much fewer words. Brevity is the Soul of Wit.
This post was edited on 4/13/26 at 9:31 am
Posted on 4/13/26 at 9:29 am to theliontamer
Do you even USAID bro?
Some people just don't want to be helped.
Some people just don't want to be helped.
Posted on 4/13/26 at 9:30 am to TrueTiger
quote:
The last time this was tried it was demonized as "colonization" and rejected.
When do you think the last time we tried this was?
Posted on 4/13/26 at 9:35 am to Powerman
quote:
When do you think the last time we tried this was?
I'm including the Western/Christian world in "we".
Posted on 4/13/26 at 9:39 am to Henry Jones Jr
quote:
we tried that for almost 20 years. Didn’t work out.
More like 100 years. I've seen some studies that put the investment by western nations at over a Trillion Dollars. It resulted in one significant change. Extreme increase in population. More people in poverty than ever.
Posted on 4/13/26 at 9:39 am to idlewatcher
quote:
Some people just don't want to be helped.
Some parts of the world don't have the capacity to operate our system.
Posted on 4/13/26 at 9:52 am to theliontamer
quote:
Wouldn't it make more sense to spend money and effort to help develop the 3rd world countries instead of just bring a few of their people to western nations?
Here is the clearest visualization of this I’ve ever seen
This post was edited on 4/13/26 at 9:53 am
Posted on 4/13/26 at 9:54 am to theliontamer
They can't vote for democrats if they're still in their home country.
Posted on 4/13/26 at 10:01 am to theliontamer
We don’t need to spend any money helping there or here. You’d get a better rate of return if you burned the money for a steam generator.
Posted on 4/13/26 at 10:02 am to theliontamer
This started in 2008 but really kicked off in 2012.
You had all these ultra Liberal Political Leaders of the European Union who really felt this would change the world and help with a population boom.
Headed by the great Angela Merkel.
They flooded all these great countries, where crime and rape was non existent with 3rd world Islamic IQ levels, thinking they would "Magically" Assimlate.
All under the "refugee" Status.
Now when they bring them in under the "refguee" status they could not legally deport them or even hold them in their jails/prision, once they were in the country.
Now what you had was a military aged men, no children, no women flooding into the country and toppling the local economies.
The result was areas where children could walk alone at night, you now had NO GO zones for police, emt, emegrency servies. You have men who father mulitple children with different wives all supported by the local state/goverment.
After 15 years of unchecked policies the country is now on paced to actually replace locals in the next 10 years from population booms.
Then they start replaceing the native politicans with there own local polititans.
Its a rabbit show of a horror show. Showing what outside liberal policies can do to a thriving homogenous native population. Its happening in the US as well. Its been already decided.
You had all these ultra Liberal Political Leaders of the European Union who really felt this would change the world and help with a population boom.
Headed by the great Angela Merkel.
They flooded all these great countries, where crime and rape was non existent with 3rd world Islamic IQ levels, thinking they would "Magically" Assimlate.
All under the "refugee" Status.
Now when they bring them in under the "refguee" status they could not legally deport them or even hold them in their jails/prision, once they were in the country.
Now what you had was a military aged men, no children, no women flooding into the country and toppling the local economies.
The result was areas where children could walk alone at night, you now had NO GO zones for police, emt, emegrency servies. You have men who father mulitple children with different wives all supported by the local state/goverment.
After 15 years of unchecked policies the country is now on paced to actually replace locals in the next 10 years from population booms.
Then they start replaceing the native politicans with there own local polititans.
Its a rabbit show of a horror show. Showing what outside liberal policies can do to a thriving homogenous native population. Its happening in the US as well. Its been already decided.
Posted on 4/13/26 at 10:07 am to theliontamer
quote:
Wouldn't it make more sense to spend money and effort to help develop the 3rd world countries instead of just bring a few of their people to western nations?
First off, it's not just a few.
Second, it's not to help them.
They are being flooded into other Nations, given free everything by Globalists, to eventually have them become voting entities that will vote away rights and give further control to Globalists so that citizens can not reverse course.
This is currently happening with France on the allowing them to vote..
Posted on 4/13/26 at 10:10 am to theliontamer
Yeah, but then immigrants wouldn’t be useful to the business establishment to suppress wages and break labor bargaining power. Plus, politicians wouldn’t be able to use immigrants as place names to cast false ballots on their behalf for rigging elections.
Posted on 4/13/26 at 10:14 am to theliontamer
We've tried that for decades, and it never works out. Most recently, the Biden admin gave over $4 billion to just the 3 northern triangle countries.
Posted on 4/13/26 at 10:33 am to theliontamer
This post was edited on 4/13/26 at 10:36 am
Posted on 4/13/26 at 10:45 am to theliontamer
quote:
Wouldn't it make more sense to spend money and effort to help develop the 3rd world countries instead of just bring a few of their people to western nations?
No, it would make sense for every western country to seal its border to the third world. Which could be done if they wanted to.
It’s not the West’s fault that Africa is a shithole and shoveling more money there won’t make a difference.
Just look at the US’s many ghettoes right now. Untold billions pumped in, free housing, food, etc. And our inner cities are still third world shitholes.
Posted on 4/13/26 at 10:48 am to TrueTiger
quote:
The last time this was tried it was demonized as "colonization" and rejected.
Britain did this mostly successfully in the 19th and early 20th century but eventually, the US of all countries got them to stop "empire building".
They are now laughing at us.
This post was edited on 4/13/26 at 11:41 am
Posted on 4/13/26 at 10:48 am to Zach
quote:
More like 100 years. I've seen some studies that put the investment by western nations at over a Trillion Dollars. It resulted in one significant change. Extreme increase in population. More people in poverty than ever.
Correct. Famine is just nature running its course. Lots of folks in the US that we need to quit feeding. They can either adapt (work) or die FWIC.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News