Started By
Message

re: 3rd world migration

Posted on 4/13/26 at 10:49 am to
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
90946 posts
Posted on 4/13/26 at 10:49 am to
quote:

Wouldn't it make more sense to spend money and effort to help develop the 3rd world countries instead of just bring a few of their people to western nations?
No?

How would that destroy the west?
Posted by CastleBravo
Rapid City, SD
Member since Sep 2013
1692 posts
Posted on 4/13/26 at 10:50 am to
Neither is effective.

Sending money to the 3rd world just goes into pockets of the dictators.

Spending money on immigrants here just ends up going to the learing center.

The only thing that works is keeping our culture and having more children ourselves.
Posted by Demonbengal
Ruston
Member since May 2015
5478 posts
Posted on 4/13/26 at 10:50 am to
You hit the nail on the head. If we are going to try and fix something let’s focus on domestically. Sending money to third world countries turns into a money laundering scheme most of the time, not to mention, warlords often steal any food/relief that does make it through. Importing third worlders doesn’t work either. I am not against importing some skilled labor if we absolutely have to have it due to shortages, but allowing in unskilled is just adding to the welfare state and prison populations.
Posted by TigersnJeeps
FL Panhandle
Member since Jan 2021
2836 posts
Posted on 4/13/26 at 11:03 am to
and he didn't even mention the 40+ million illegals that are here and their effect on our society...
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
65058 posts
Posted on 4/13/26 at 11:04 am to
quote:

we tried that for almost 20 years. Didn’t work out. Just leave them over there and let them fight amongst themselves.

This. All you get when you 'develop' the third world is more third worlders, followed by the collapse of what you 'developed' because certain cultures were not meant to be civilized, much less massively multiplied through 'aid.'
Posted by wareaglepete
Union of Soviet Auburn Republics
Member since Dec 2012
18417 posts
Posted on 4/13/26 at 11:08 am to
quote:

Wouldn't it make more sense to spend money and effort to help develop the 3rd world countries


Might as well just burn the money.
Posted by Rip Torner
Member since Jul 2023
2012 posts
Posted on 4/13/26 at 11:11 am to
The British did no such thing and it was colonization. Their “success” story is South Africa and they kicked the British out.
Posted by soonerinlOUisiana
South of I-10
Member since Aug 2012
1909 posts
Posted on 4/13/26 at 11:20 am to
quote:

Wouldn't it make more sense to spend money and effort to help develop the 3rd world countries instead of just bring a few of their people to western nations?


No. Just boot them out when they try to invade the USA.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
117386 posts
Posted on 4/13/26 at 11:22 am to
quote:

Lots of folks in the US that we need to quit feeding.

Just look at any HS yearbook from the 1960s. About 1% of the students are obese.
Posted by bluewatersailor
Member since Oct 2018
653 posts
Posted on 4/13/26 at 11:37 am to
Bill Clinton "spent" $500 million 1992 USD and you can't find evidence of a single penny of it spent for roads, water, crops, etc. That would be billions of today dollars. Just grift and corruption. Chelsea did have a nice wedding though.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram