- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
I dont listen to candace
Posted on 4/11/26 at 10:18 pm
Posted on 4/11/26 at 10:18 pm
But my daughter has paid attention to her conspiracy theories, while not falling for them, she does find them curious. Her question was why, other than the macrons, why hasnt candace been sued by the likes of Erica Kirk for defamation. I give Erica a lot of grace after what she has been through.
6
Posted on 4/11/26 at 10:25 pm to LChama
quote:
why hasnt candace been sued by the likes of Erica Kirk for defamation.
The biggest part of it is that Candace isn’t making direct accusations or claims.
She’s also very careful to quote other people. So she says “If you saw this tweet by (this unknown bitch you’ve never heard of) you’ll see that people are calling Erika a psychopathic liar. And there’s a lot of people saying that. Maybe that’s true?”
Posted on 4/11/26 at 10:26 pm to the808bass
Owens is a world class see you next Tuesday.
This post was edited on 4/11/26 at 10:26 pm
Posted on 4/11/26 at 10:27 pm to the808bass
Someone that appears that crazy but has enough sense to protect themselves legally might be just acting.
Posted on 4/11/26 at 10:40 pm to LChama
The standard for defaming a public figure is also much higher than for a private citizen.
Posted on 4/11/26 at 10:46 pm to the808bass
quote:
The biggest part of it is that Candace isn’t making direct accusations or claims
She’ll slip up. I hope she gets whats coming to her
Posted on 4/11/26 at 11:04 pm to LChama
Still don’t understand why questioning narratives is so off limits. Erica should be scrutinized
Posted on 4/11/26 at 11:07 pm to SuperSaint
Lol “questioning narratives” is quite vague. Of course questioning narratives is perfectly ok, as a general matter. It’s how you go about doing that where one can get themselves in some serious trouble. But I’m betting that you know that already.
Posted on 4/11/26 at 11:29 pm to LChama
quote:
candace
She’s like 1 month away from death to America chants
Posted on 4/12/26 at 5:12 am to SuperSaint
quote:
. Erica should be scrutinized
Why?
Posted on 4/12/26 at 6:28 am to Bayou2atl
quote:
quote:
. Erica should be scrutinized
Why?
Because ALL public figures that are driving opinions, policy, or law should be scrutinized. The public should know the agenda of these people, whether good or bad, so they can make informed decisions about the things they do and say beyond just the surface level tribalism.
Posted on 4/12/26 at 8:13 am to the808bass
quote:
The biggest part of it is that Candace isn’t making direct accusations or claims.
She’s also very careful to quote other people. So she says “If you saw this tweet by (this unknown bitch you’ve never heard of) you’ll see that people are calling Erika a psychopathic liar. And there’s a lot of people saying that. Maybe that’s true?”
This is media 101.
Reports say that sirwinston is a child molester. I'm not saying he is one, but reports have said he is. Maybe it's something we should consider and investigate? We don't want child molesters on this forum after all.
Posted on 4/12/26 at 8:18 am to Onyx Aggie
quote:
Because ALL public figures that are driving opinions, policy, or law should be scrutinized. The public should know the agenda of these people, whether good or bad, so they can make informed decisions about the things they do and say beyond just the surface level tribalism
are you so feeble minded that your opinions are driven by the opinion of others?
Posted on 4/12/26 at 8:49 am to dickkellog
quote:No, you fricking retard, but most of the public is, so it only makes sense to know the motives of those attempting to do so.
are you so feeble minded that your opinions are driven by the opinion of others?
Posted on 4/12/26 at 8:51 am to LChama
Hot take: i don’t care for attention seekers. Both Erika Kirk and Candace seek attention as the main function of their job.
I don’t care for either one tbh.
I don’t care for either one tbh.
Posted on 4/12/26 at 9:27 am to LSUnation78
if the govt wasn't so shady, there would be no candace
Posted on 4/12/26 at 9:29 am to SuperSaint
quote:
Erica should be scrutinized
She has been. Mostly by other women who find her behavior post assassination bizarre.
Posted on 4/12/26 at 9:31 am to LChama
who you talking about?
Posted on 4/12/26 at 9:32 am to the808bass
Thats a bingo
Posted on 4/12/26 at 9:38 am to LChama
quote:
She’ll slip up. I hope she gets whats coming to her
She’s living on outrage. The problem with outrage is that it becomes less outrageous with continued exposure. Therefore she will have to manufacture another outrage or loose her minions. That’s difficult. Usually the outrage mongers have to ratchet up the outrage on their meal ticket until they cross the line.
She will eventually cross the line or fall into obscurity. And for her ilk, obscurity is worse than being sued into bankruptcy. She will choose the flaming quick death over the slow.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News