- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
This ??? is For Legal Professionals. What is Your Honest Opinion of Ketanji Brown Jackson?
Posted on 3/31/26 at 10:08 am
Posted on 3/31/26 at 10:08 am
Simple question. What's your assessment of her as a Supreme Court Justice?
19
Posted on 3/31/26 at 10:08 am to KCT
Posted on 3/31/26 at 10:09 am to KCT
I'm a lawyer. I stayed at the Holiday Inn Express last night.....she is straight up dumb
But good luck getting an "honest" opinion from some of these clown divorce and living will lawyers on here
But good luck getting an "honest" opinion from some of these clown divorce and living will lawyers on here
This post was edited on 3/31/26 at 10:11 am
Posted on 3/31/26 at 10:10 am to KCT
Dead birds have higher IQs
Posted on 3/31/26 at 10:10 am to KCT
She reminds me of the AA in my law school class.
They just don’t get it.
They just don’t get it.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 10:12 am to KCT
She tries too hard and ends up being clever, as a result.
Some of that has been overblown by people who weren't smart enough to get it (the "not a biologist" comment during her confirmation), but her legal scholarship took it to a much lower level. She's basically dug herself in, at this point, and that's not particularly good for rationality.
*ETA for smooth brains: "Clever" is not a compliment.
Some of that has been overblown by people who weren't smart enough to get it (the "not a biologist" comment during her confirmation), but her legal scholarship took it to a much lower level. She's basically dug herself in, at this point, and that's not particularly good for rationality.
*ETA for smooth brains: "Clever" is not a compliment.
This post was edited on 3/31/26 at 10:21 am
Posted on 3/31/26 at 10:16 am to KCT
You don't need a legal professional to answer this.
She's not qualified.
Sotomayor is also not qualified.
And just so you know it's not political. I would have big disagreements with Kagan or someone like Ginsberg in the past but no one with a brain would argue that both weren't qualified.
She's not qualified.
Sotomayor is also not qualified.
And just so you know it's not political. I would have big disagreements with Kagan or someone like Ginsberg in the past but no one with a brain would argue that both weren't qualified.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 10:16 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Some of that has been overblown by people who weren't smart enough to get it
So, she isn't stupid. It's people like me that can't figure out how "clever" she is?
What exactly is she trying to be clever about?
Posted on 3/31/26 at 10:17 am to KCT
Whenever I see the argument only attorneys should be qualified to be on the Supreme Court, she is my proof that being an attorney does not magically guarantee wisdom.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 10:17 am to KCT
quote:
So, she isn't stupid.
I don't know if she's stupid or not. She very well could be. That's not a demarcation low enough to describe plenty of posters on here who still aren't smart enough to get it.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 10:18 am to KCT
She is either:
So stupid that she cannot understand constitutional principles
or
Understands them perfectly well, hates them, and is seeking to destroy them
So stupid that she cannot understand constitutional principles
or
Understands them perfectly well, hates them, and is seeking to destroy them
Posted on 3/31/26 at 10:19 am to KCT
quote:
So, she isn't stupid. It's people like me that can't figure out how "clever" she is?
What exactly is she trying to be clever about?
Gotta take up for SFP here - I think he nailed it
Her only asset seems to be in trying to be stupid - she succeeds more often than not
Posted on 3/31/26 at 10:20 am to Tiger985
quote:
You don't need a legal professional to answer this.
I specifically asked for "legal eagles" to answer this because I've noticed that 2-3 here have seemingly NEVER criticized her a single time.
Heck, even her "peers" on the Supreme Court have indicated that she is an embarrassment to them.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 10:21 am to KCT
quote:
I specifically asked for "legal eagles" to answer this because I've noticed that 2-3 here have seemingly NEVER criticized her a single time.
Who? Senile VOR?
Posted on 3/31/26 at 10:21 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
She is either:
So stupid that she cannot understand constitutional principles
or
Understands them perfectly well, hates them, and is seeking to destroy them
I think it’s the latter because her rulings are all about how she FEELS about the law, how she FEELS about the case, not what the law states or how it’s applied to the case.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 10:22 am to ChineseBandit58
SFP bat signal
Posted on 3/31/26 at 10:25 am to ChineseBandit58
Stupid implies she's unintelligent. That, I don't buy. She's lacks wisdom and she is inclined to force-fit her legal interpretations into a specific ideological framework more so than the other justices. She's likely a qualified judge in most venues, but not to the standards of the SCOTUS. But that tends to happen when you put demographics before merit.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 10:25 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I don't know if she's stupid or not. She very well could be.
But you just said that she was being clever. Those comments are obviously contradictory.
You know, for a self-professed conservative you seemingly struggle with wanting to call out the obvious about her. Instead, you take the "4cubbie route" and deflect to your declaration about posters here.
Very strange, indeed.
Posted on 3/31/26 at 10:27 am to KCT
DEI
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News