- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Trump & Japan PM set to announce $40 billion nuclear power project in southern US
Posted on 3/19/26 at 8:33 am
Posted on 3/19/26 at 8:33 am
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
- The post highlights an upcoming announcement by U.S. President Trump and Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi for a $40 billion nuclear power project in the southern U.S., funded through a $550 billion bilateral investment framework established in late 2025 to secure critical minerals and energy supplies.
- This project, centered on advanced reactors potentially involving Westinghouse technology, addresses surging energy demands from AI data centers and electrification, positioning the U.S. to catch up with China's 40+ nuclear plants under construction.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 8:34 am to hawgfaninc
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
The United States and Japan are set to announce a major $40 billion nuclear power project during Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's visit to Washington on March 19, 2026. This initiative forms part of the broader $550 billion investment and loan pledge from Japan, stemming from a tariff and trade agreement with the U.S. under President Donald Trump. The project focuses on deploying small modular reactors (SMRs), specifically the BWRX-300 design, and represents the latest round of commitments following an earlier $36 billion package.
The project will be led by GE Vernova (through its joint venture GE Vernova Hitachi Nuclear Energy) and Hitachi, targeting construction sites in Tennessee and Alabama. These locations align with existing U.S. efforts to advance SMR technology, such as the Tennessee Valley Authority's ongoing work at the Clinch River site in Tennessee, where the BWRX-300 has already received federal support and regulatory progress. The reactors are viewed as a faster, more flexible alternative to traditional large-scale nuclear plants.
A primary motivation for the deal is to address surging electricity demand driven by artificial intelligence data centers and other high-energy industries. The SMRs would provide reliable, carbon-free baseload power to support U.S. energy independence and industrial growth. This nuclear component complements other elements in the Japan-U.S. investment framework, including natural gas power plants and infrastructure projects aimed at strengthening bilateral energy supply chains amid global uncertainties.
The announcement builds on prior discussions and agreements between the two nations. Earlier talks had explored even larger nuclear collaborations (up to $100 billion in some proposals involving Westinghouse), but this specific $40 billion deal centers on GE Vernova-Hitachi's SMR technology. It reflects ongoing momentum from meetings between Trump and Takaichi, including efforts to ease trade tensions through reciprocal investments in American infrastructure.
While promising rapid deployment and economic benefits, the project faces hurdles such as regulatory approvals from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the fact that no commercial SMRs currently operate on U.S. grids. Supporters see it as a step toward a nuclear renaissance and enhanced energy security, while the scale and timeline will depend on successful execution of permitting, financing, and construction phases.
This post was edited on 3/19/26 at 8:36 am
Posted on 3/19/26 at 8:35 am to hawgfaninc
About time we get over it and build more nuclear plants.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 8:35 am to hawgfaninc
Awesome news. Nuclear is the way.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 8:35 am to hawgfaninc
Unless they are buying the bulk if the equipment from us, Europe or Russia, the Chinese building 40 nuke plants is scary.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 8:37 am to hawgfaninc
But nothing happened at Three Mile Island 50 years ago so we have to close our plants!
Think of the environment and children!!!!
/s
(Nuclear has always been the answer)
Think of the environment and children!!!!
/s
(Nuclear has always been the answer)
This post was edited on 3/19/26 at 8:38 am
Posted on 3/19/26 at 8:45 am to Strannix
quote:
the Chinese building 40 nuke plants is scary
Why is this scary?
Posted on 3/19/26 at 8:52 am to hawgfaninc
quote:
While promising rapid deployment and economic benefits, the project faces hurdles such as regulatory approvals from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the fact that no commercial SMRs currently operate on U.S. grids. Supporters see it as a step toward a nuclear renaissance and enhanced energy security, while the scale and timeline will depend on successful execution of permitting, financing, and construction phases.
Nothing a few executive orders can't solve.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 8:57 am to hawgfaninc
All of our electricity should be produced by nuclear plants
Posted on 3/19/26 at 9:01 am to UtahCajun
quote:
quote:
the Chinese building 40 nuke plants is scary
Why is this scary?
I think he is referring to the well known shoddy construction standards in china, it has its own idiom.....
"cheap no good and good no cheap"
Posted on 3/19/26 at 9:04 am to Ping Pong
I disagree. Nuclear is perfect for providing large efficient quantities of baseload power. However, it’s not quite as nimble for handling spikes and valleys in demand. Natural gas plants are much easier to turn on and off. ideal grid would use Nuclear and hydroelectric for base load power and Natural Gas fired plants to handle spikes.
This post was edited on 3/19/26 at 9:05 am
Posted on 3/19/26 at 9:08 am to trinidadtiger
quote:
I think he is referring to the well known shoddy construction standards in china, it has its own idiom.....
"cheap no good and good no cheap"
Not versed on construction/design codes and standards in China. I have some buddies that went to work over there. They said they use a few American construction/fabrication codes(which is why they got the job) as do most countries. Of course do they follow them like we do?
Posted on 3/19/26 at 9:10 am to hawgfaninc
Build it in Montgomery. If there's a meltdown, no one will realize.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 11:31 am to hawgfaninc
This is good news
Nuclear is the way to cheap and plentiful electricity
Nuclear is the way to cheap and plentiful electricity
Posted on 3/19/26 at 11:33 am to hawgfaninc
Am I the only one noticing Zerhedge's avatar? 
Posted on 3/19/26 at 11:45 am to SallysHuman
hopefully they will choose SC where we already have half a plant built...
Posted on 3/19/26 at 11:47 am to GamecockUltimate
quote:
hopefully they will choose SC where we already have half a plant built...
Your post excites me and makes me angry.
Eff SCANA/SCE&G.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 11:48 am to Ping Pong
quote:
All of our electricity should be produced by nuclear plants
Never put all of your eggs in one basket. Establish nuclear as the backbone of the supply, though. Use PWRs to power the data centers. If they're good enough for a submarine, they're good enough for a data center.
Posted on 3/19/26 at 11:52 am to hawgfaninc
Sticking in the same geographic area, Browns Ferry Nuclear Power Plant in central north AL has been quietly going about the process of upgrade and improvement which has gotten it an 80 year license extension. It is licensed to operate into the 2050s, and I believe is still looking to add 20 more years to that with a 100 year license.
*Dates and years of operation are from the original commission date of the reactors.
*Dates and years of operation are from the original commission date of the reactors.
This post was edited on 3/19/26 at 11:56 am
Popular
Back to top


10







