- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Let's admit it, John Roberts, et al., have been a total disappointment.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 12:40 pm
Posted on 2/20/26 at 12:40 pm
Coney-Barrett & Gorsuch (Trump nominees)... both heavily influenced by Roberts (dubya Bush nominated).
Those three sided with the commies on tariffs.
It's an f-ing travesty.
Roberts is the worst Chief Justice since ... I dunno. In a long time.
Those three sided with the commies on tariffs.
It's an f-ing travesty.
Roberts is the worst Chief Justice since ... I dunno. In a long time.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. 
29
Posted on 2/20/26 at 12:41 pm to scrooster
Roberts is compromised.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 12:42 pm to scrooster
What's interesting is there are only questions about what the GOP appointees will do, NEVER about what the dem ones will do.
Why is that?
Why is that?
Posted on 2/20/26 at 12:44 pm to Epaminondas
quote:
Roberts is compromised.
Why, because he upheld the constitution and not Trump's ambitions to be King?
Posted on 2/20/26 at 12:46 pm to scrooster
Roberts bent over backwards for Obamacare and ruled against Tarriffs.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 12:46 pm to scrooster
Amy Coney Barrett is another failed Louisianian that has once again embarrassed the state.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 12:50 pm to scrooster
I admit that I'm pretty much aligned with Gorsuch, and if he says it ain't flying, I'm good with that. He's about the most constitutionally sound justice of all of them, although I'm more ideologically aligned with Alito and Thomas.
Let it ride. We have other fish to fry, and if we don't take care of the SAVE Act, none of this is going to amount to a hill of beans.
Let it ride. We have other fish to fry, and if we don't take care of the SAVE Act, none of this is going to amount to a hill of beans.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 12:54 pm to RohanGonzales
quote:Bc the “conservative” justices are ruling based on honest interpretation of our Constitution, which sometimes means disappointing rulings, as the founders meant it to be.
What's interesting is there are only questions about what the GOP appointees will do, NEVER about what the dem ones will do. Why is that?
The liberals are full on partisan hacks.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 12:54 pm to TigersBucs
quote:
Why, because he upheld the constitution and not Trump's ambitions to be King?
Posted like a true commie socialist NWO Globalist.
Why didn't the court include a ruling on what to do with the $176 billion in revenues that were collected?
Answer: Because Roberts is compromised and this wasn't about the legality of the tariffs (SEE: Trade Act of 1974) ... this was completely about throwing a wrench in the gears of what Trump is trying to accomplish.
Our trade deficit was insane.
The jobs that have left this country since Clinton ... has been insane.
The bullshite we've endured at the hands of the Canadians, the Chinese, the Mexicans, et al., is insane.
Roberts' Court is, and has been since he was confirmed, a f-ing shite show.
This post was edited on 2/20/26 at 1:38 pm
Posted on 2/20/26 at 12:58 pm to scrooster
He’s not a conservative or a strict constructionist. Never has been.
He broadly expanded executive power with his rulings in the wake of 9/11. He was placed in position at the forefront apex of neocon power in the state.
Now he rules in favor of limiting the executive power to conduct trade and commerce.
He is above all an institutionalist. He believes in systems and institutions over people, country, the Constitution, and believes they must be protected and strengthened.
He will evolve his rulings as necessary to maintain that objective.
He broadly expanded executive power with his rulings in the wake of 9/11. He was placed in position at the forefront apex of neocon power in the state.
Now he rules in favor of limiting the executive power to conduct trade and commerce.
He is above all an institutionalist. He believes in systems and institutions over people, country, the Constitution, and believes they must be protected and strengthened.
He will evolve his rulings as necessary to maintain that objective.
This post was edited on 2/20/26 at 12:59 pm
Posted on 2/20/26 at 12:58 pm to crotiger0307
quote:
Bc the “conservative” justices are ruling based on honest interpretation of our Constitution, which sometimes means disappointing rulings, as the founders meant it to be.
The liberals are full on partisan hacks.
That is true.
The question is whether we continue to be "principled" all the way to the death of the country.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 12:59 pm to scrooster
quote:
Posted like a true commie socialist NWO Globalist.
More Buzzword Bingo from a zealot that was probably an epidemiologist 5 years ago and is now a Constitutional Law professor.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 1:03 pm to Ag Zwin
not really. they stopped Biden on some over reach. now if they strike down tariffs that rely on a different statute, then i will join you in your disappointment.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 1:05 pm to scrooster
quote:
Why didn't the court include a ruling on what to do with the $176 billion in revenues that were collected?
Why would they?
That's not their job.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 1:06 pm to RohanGonzales
quote:
The question is whether we continue to be "principled" all the way to the death of the country.
So you thought the Supreme Court also messed up with Biden's vax mandate and student loan forgiveness policy, right?
Posted on 2/20/26 at 1:07 pm to RohanGonzales
quote:
What's interesting is there are only questions about what the GOP appointees will do, NEVER about what the dem ones will do.
Why is that?
Trump just dropped a bomb.
He said there is foreign influence over certain members of the Supreme Court.
When pressed he said, "you're going to find out."
When asked about Coney-Barrett and Gorsuch, he said, "I'm disappointed. They're good Justices and I don't regret nominating them ... but I'm very disappointed in them. John Roberts is the problem."
Posted on 2/20/26 at 1:08 pm to scrooster
What does the deep state have on Roberts? I’ve been told it’s an illegal adoption.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 1:09 pm to SlowFlowPro
Don't forget that he is in charge of the FISA courts and did jack shite when it came out that they were rubber stamping anything that the intellegience community brought to them.
Posted on 2/20/26 at 1:09 pm to scrooster
quote:
Trump just dropped a bomb.
He said there is foreign influence over certain members of the Supreme Court.
Stop before you embarrass yourself
Posted on 2/20/26 at 1:09 pm to RobertFootball
quote:
What does the deep state have on Roberts? I’ve been told it’s an illegal adoption.
That's all I've heard... seems like it'd have to be more than just that though, right?
Page 1 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News