- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
If Trump bombs Iran do you think his poll numbers will improve?
Posted on 2/19/26 at 8:57 am
Posted on 2/19/26 at 8:57 am
Current polling on the issue:
SSRS/University of Maryland poll from February 5-9, 2026, 21% of Americans favor the U.S. initiating an attack on Iran under current circumstances, while 49% oppose it and 30% are unsure.
Economist/YouGov poll from January 30-February 2, 2026, showed 48% opposing U.S. military action in Iran, compared to 28% in support and 24% unsure. A separate YouGov poll in early February reinforced this, with 48% opposing action.
Quinnipiac University's January 14, 2026, poll indicated 70% of voters believe the U.S. should not take military action against Iran even if the regime kills protesters, versus 18% who support involvement. This sentiment held across groups: 80% of independents, 79% of Democrats, and 53% of Republicans opposed intervention.
The Marist Poll from January 16, 2026, reported 57% of Americans opposing U.S. military action in Iran, with 42% in support. Over 80% of Democrats and 60%+ of independents opposed it.
The poll numbers say no, Trump's numbers would not improve however generally speaking a wartime president always seems to get an initial positive bump in approval numbers with one significant caveat: a direct attack on the U.S., whether false or not.
One thing this potential Iranian conflict lacks is an attack from Iran on U.S. soil or American military or civilians abroad. Without those events and if Trump bombs Iran, history indicates polling will be tough sledding into the midterms.
SSRS/University of Maryland poll from February 5-9, 2026, 21% of Americans favor the U.S. initiating an attack on Iran under current circumstances, while 49% oppose it and 30% are unsure.
Economist/YouGov poll from January 30-February 2, 2026, showed 48% opposing U.S. military action in Iran, compared to 28% in support and 24% unsure. A separate YouGov poll in early February reinforced this, with 48% opposing action.
Quinnipiac University's January 14, 2026, poll indicated 70% of voters believe the U.S. should not take military action against Iran even if the regime kills protesters, versus 18% who support involvement. This sentiment held across groups: 80% of independents, 79% of Democrats, and 53% of Republicans opposed intervention.
The Marist Poll from January 16, 2026, reported 57% of Americans opposing U.S. military action in Iran, with 42% in support. Over 80% of Democrats and 60%+ of independents opposed it.
The poll numbers say no, Trump's numbers would not improve however generally speaking a wartime president always seems to get an initial positive bump in approval numbers with one significant caveat: a direct attack on the U.S., whether false or not.
One thing this potential Iranian conflict lacks is an attack from Iran on U.S. soil or American military or civilians abroad. Without those events and if Trump bombs Iran, history indicates polling will be tough sledding into the midterms.
This post was edited on 2/19/26 at 8:58 am
Posted on 2/19/26 at 8:58 am to GumboPot
"Bomb Iran, bomb, bomb Iran" - The Maverick
Posted on 2/19/26 at 8:58 am to GumboPot
1. I don't want war.
2. I don't want the president to be making such decisions based on polling.
2. I don't want the president to be making such decisions based on polling.
Posted on 2/19/26 at 8:59 am to GumboPot
It certainly should, especially with the Jewish community and the trickle down effects caused by their pleasure.
Posted on 2/19/26 at 9:02 am to BTROleMisser
quote:
"Bomb Iran, bomb, bomb Iran" - The Maverick
Funny how Hollywood manipulates the American state of mind like bombing Iran is a far gone conclusion. This persuasive technique was called "talking past the sale" by Scott Adams, IIRC.
Posted on 2/19/26 at 9:03 am to GumboPot
True. There have been no actual “acts of war” against the U.S. I think many if not most Americans would view an actual war as unnecessary and would not support it…
Posted on 2/19/26 at 9:03 am to GumboPot
They would in South Carolina
Posted on 2/19/26 at 9:04 am to GumboPot
I wish we had polls that were accurate.
Posted on 2/19/26 at 9:04 am to Timeoday
Netinyahooo better give us a cut of his new condos
Posted on 2/19/26 at 9:05 am to Timeoday
quote:
especially with the Jewish community
They will still vote D in the next election.
Posted on 2/19/26 at 9:06 am to SallysHuman
quote:
war
Its just gonna be about a 3 day distant bombing campaign. Leadership dies or surrenders...up to them
Posted on 2/19/26 at 9:11 am to GumboPot
I'm sure they'll go up in Israel and with AIPAC, which is all he seems to care about as of late.
Posted on 2/19/26 at 9:11 am to GumboPot
Why would he care about polling when hes doing the right thing
If he doesbt you ppl will cry Taco
If he doesbt you ppl will cry Taco
Posted on 2/19/26 at 9:12 am to GumboPot
There is nothing that is going to improve his numbers. He is down to rabid diehard trumpers only.
Posted on 2/19/26 at 9:15 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Why would he care about polling when hes doing the right thing
The polling indicates that most people think it's not the right thing.
In order to be persuasive on this issue without a direct attack on the U.S. from Iran, it's going to take some highly nuanced and articulate persuasive skill to change people's minds.
I look forward to Trump's sales pitch.
Posted on 2/19/26 at 9:17 am to alive2022
quote:
He is down to rabid diehard trumpers only.
I don't think you are wrong. If Kamala was president and leading the charge to bomb Iran the same people supporting Trump bombing Iran now would be against it with Kamala.
Posted on 2/19/26 at 9:18 am to GumboPot
quote:
If Kamala was president and leading the charge to bomb Iran the same people supporting Trump bombing Iran now would be against it with Kamala.
This truth will anger the trumpers
Posted on 2/19/26 at 9:19 am to GumboPot
Only Kamala would be aiding Iran in putting down the protests.
Posted on 2/19/26 at 9:20 am to SallysHuman
quote:WWIII with Iran lasted what 6 minutes before they tapped out? WWIV with them might last a Weekend.
I don't want war.
Popular
Back to top


25











