Started By
Message

Winning a Super Bowl in the state of California actually cost Sam Darnold 70k.

Posted on 2/9/26 at 2:07 pm
Posted by BoomerandSooner
Member since Sep 2025
1958 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 2:07 pm
Thanks Gavin.



https://sports.yahoo.com/articles/sam-darnold-pay-hefty-california-061934079.html

quote:

According to Sportico reporter Kurt Badenhausen, the Golden State's notorious "jock tax" means Darnold will fork over more in taxes than he receives in his Super Bowl winner's bonus.

"California has the highest income tax of any state, and the Super Bowl means 8 'duty days' in CA. Taxes hit your annual comp," Badenhausen posted. "Super Bowl winner bonus from NFL: $178K/player. Sam Darnold's estimated CA taxes: $249K."

Per this terrible math, Darnold receives $178,000 for winning the Super Bowl but owes California an estimated $249,000 in state income tax for his time in the state. It is a $71,000 net loss for helping the Seahawks to win the NFL final.
Posted by Saint Alfonzo
Member since Jan 2019
29176 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 2:08 pm to
He should just not pay it. frick California.
Posted by Stidham8
Member since Aug 2018
9928 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 2:11 pm to
It really is going to be interesting to see what happens to California as their population continues to shrink.

The people with brains are getting out and most white liberals aren’t having many, if any kids.
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
81087 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 2:13 pm to
Imagine getting drafted by a California or NY team.
Posted by OchoDedos
Republic of Texas
Member since Oct 2014
39633 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 2:16 pm to
Darnold a legal resident of California? If not , he doesn't practice his profession full time as a resident in the State of California. California tried this bs with Airline Pilots that were non residents, merely making legs thru California commercial airports. Federal Court declared it illegal
Posted by The Pickwick
Member since Jan 2025
580 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 2:21 pm to
No he won’t. People have no idea how the tax system works.
Posted by Laugh More
Member since Jan 2022
3675 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

Darnold a legal resident of California? If not , he doesn't practice his profession full time as a resident in the State of California.


Interesting. What constitutes “full time?”

Is it a percentage of your total hours or something?

Cause if its 100% percent of your time, I’m sure there’s creative ways to work “out of state” on paper (or legitimately) to try and avoid this bullshite
Posted by beaux duke
Member since Oct 2023
3946 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 2:23 pm to
Posted by BarnHater
Member since May 2015
8179 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 2:25 pm to
quote:

No he won’t. People have no idea how the tax system works.


More leftist lies. The math is right there in the OP.
Posted by baldona
Florida
Member since Feb 2016
23753 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 2:26 pm to
I was hoping an accountant with some experience with this would chime in on one of the threads, there's been multiple.

There's no way the CPA's don't have good ways of reducing this. I would also think the pro sports would have better ways to handle this.

Its never as simple as 1/20 games in California so 1/20th is taxed. Someone said 8/365 days. But I've never heard of someone being taxed for a "day" of work and he's not working all 8 days really. Not to mention he certainly isn't working all 365 days of the year.
Posted by The Pickwick
Member since Jan 2025
580 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

The math is right there in the OP.


And the OP is not correct. Sure he MAY have to pay it up front but if his tax guy has half a brian he will get it back.

For people to believe this is crazy
This post was edited on 2/9/26 at 2:30 pm
Posted by theballguy
Un-PC for either side
Member since Oct 2011
35018 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 2:33 pm to
Good thing Darnold has enough money to not hire a broke-dick accountant who would tell him he has to pay this.

He doesn't owe a dime to CA in taxes at all. Does anyone here understand how this works? Doesn't seem like it.
Posted by AubieinNC2009
Mountain NC
Member since Dec 2018
7135 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 2:37 pm to
this is actually not true, its only on the money made in CA.

"What that means here is that the winning team, their take-home pay will be approximately $86,000. If you're on the losing side, the take-home would be about $49,800,"
Posted by beaux duke
Member since Oct 2023
3946 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

For people to believe this is crazy


Posted by OldManRiver
Prairieville, LA
Member since Jan 2005
7452 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 2:38 pm to
quote:

He doesn't owe a dime to CA in taxes at all. Does anyone here understand how this works? Doesn't seem like it.

He absolutely does, all professional players do

Google the "jock tax"
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
62687 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

Darnold a legal resident of California? If not , he doesn't practice his profession full time as a resident in the State of California. California tried this bs with Airline Pilots that were non residents, merely making legs thru California commercial airports. Federal Court declared it illegal


I don’t think that it works like this. I believe athletes do pay state taxes for each state in which they play games.
Posted by Mo Jeaux
Member since Aug 2008
62687 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

He doesn't owe a dime to CA in taxes at all. Does anyone here understand how this works? Doesn't seem like it.


I believe that you’re wrong.
Posted by FATBOY TIGER
Valhalla
Member since Jan 2016
13090 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 2:43 pm to
California currently has the highest top marginal income tax rate in the U.S. at 13.3%. In addition, a 1.3% disability insurance tax (instituted in 2024) applies to all wages, bringing the effective top rate for athletes to approximately 14.6%.
The tax is calculated using the "Duty Day" method:
Ratio: The number of days spent "on duty" in California (practices, games, media days, team meetings) is divided by the total number of duty days in the season.
Application: This percentage is applied to the athlete's entire annual salary, not just the bonus for the specific California game.
Super Bowl LX Impact: Players in the 2026 Super Bowl typically logged at least eight duty days in California. Because the tax applies to a portion of their multi-million dollar season salaries, some players can actually lose money by playing in the game.
Posted by BoomerandSooner
Member since Sep 2025
1958 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 2:45 pm to
quote:

And the OP is not correct. Sure he MAY have to pay it up front but if his tax guy has half a brian he will get it back.


The information is correct. What a tax guy does to alleviate the amount is another issue. Not to mention that different accountants might treat this differently with different results.

Posted by TigerAxeOK
Where I lay my head is home.
Member since Dec 2016
36490 posts
Posted on 2/9/26 at 2:50 pm to
quote:

It really is going to be interesting to see what happens to California as their population continues to shrink.

The people with brains are getting out

That's another problem altogether. They're going to AZ, Boise, FL and TX and they're bringing their unchanged voting habits with them. They're not that "smart" at all when they can't see that how they vote directly led to what they got. And they're spreading to conservative states like the fires of Mordor. Ask them why California is faltering, and they'll tell you "Because of Trump's domestic policies". I've witnessed this time and time again.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram