- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Nearly 40% of Stanford undergraduates claim they’re disabled.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:42 am
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:42 am
LINK
It's becoming understandable why these academic retards can't make it through life without a personal assistant, therapy hamster and lifelong mental assistance.
quote:
in one of the nicest buildings on campus. As she took me around her space, which included a private bathroom, a walk-in shower and a great view of Hoover Tower, she casually mentioned that she had lived in a single all four years she had attended Stanford.
I was surprised. Most people don’t get the privilege of a single room until they reach their senior year.
That’s when my friend gave me a tip: Stanford had granted her “a disability accommodation”.
She, of course, didn’t have a disability. She knew it. I knew it. But she had figured out early what most Stanford students eventually learn: the Office of Accessible Education will give students a single room, extra time on tests and even exemptions from academic requirements if they qualify as “disabled”.
Everyone was doing it. I could do it, too, if I just knew how to ask.
housing on campus.
At Stanford University in Palo Alto, California, where competition for the best dorm rooms is fierce, this practice is particularly rife. The Atlantic reported that 38 percent of undergraduates at my college were registered as having a disability — that’s 2,850 students out of a class of 7,500 — and 24 per cent of undergrads received academic or housing accommodations in the fall quarter.
At the Ivy League colleges Brown and Harvard, more than 20 per cent of undergrads are registered as disabled. Contrast these numbers with America’s community colleges, where only 3 to 4 per cent of students receive disability accommodations. Bizarrely, the schools that boast the most academically successful students are the ones with the largest number who claim disabilities — disabilities that you’d think would deter academic success.
The truth is, the system is there to be gamed, and most students feel that if you’re not gaming it, you’re putting yourself at a disadvantage.
When I arrived on campus two and a half years ago, I would have assumed that special allowances were made for a small number of students who genuinely needed them. But I quickly discovered that wasn’t true. Some diagnoses are real and serious, of course, such as epilepsy, anaphylactic allergies, sleep apnea or severe physical disabilities.
But most students, in my experience, claim less severe ailments, such as ADHD or anxiety. And some “disabilities” are just downright silly. Students claim “night terrors”; others say they “get easily distracted” or they “can’t live with others”. I know a guy who was granted a single room because he needs to wear contacts at night. I’ve heard of a girl who got a single because she was gluten intolerant.
In addition to a single housing assignment, I was granted extra absences from class, some late days on assignments and a 15-minute tardiness allowance for all of my classes. I was met with so little scepticism or questioning, I probably didn’t even need a doctor’s note to get these exemptions. Had I been pushier, I am sure I could have received almost any accommodation I asked for.
“In college, I haven’t had that many ‘in real life’ tests as opposed to take-home essays,” Callie told me. “When I did use the extra time, I felt guilty, because I probably didn’t deserve the accommodations, given the fact I got into Stanford and could compete at a high academic level. Extra time on tests — some students even get double time — seems unfair to me.”
It's becoming understandable why these academic retards can't make it through life without a personal assistant, therapy hamster and lifelong mental assistance.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:45 am to LSUDVM1999
And schools wonder why these kids go out into the corporate world and fall flat on their faces
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:45 am to LSUDVM1999
This isn't new; it was already a well known tactic back when I was taking the LSAT two decades ago. Getting extra time on an exam that is only difficult because of the extreme time crunch is a leg up that a lot of people couldn't resist taking. I imagine that has only proliferated since then.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:46 am to LSUDVM1999
3rd worldification of the US. Even the “good” immigrants bring problems here
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:47 am to LSUDVM1999
This was happening at LSU Law when I was there circa 2011-2014.
First semester in my section? Maybe 2 or 3 kids got an exception to take their test in a separate room for 2x the time due to “ADD” or some such nonsense.
Second semester? Easily 25-30 kids had miraculously obtained whatever doctor’s note was required to get the same special treatment.
It’s a total farce.
First semester in my section? Maybe 2 or 3 kids got an exception to take their test in a separate room for 2x the time due to “ADD” or some such nonsense.
Second semester? Easily 25-30 kids had miraculously obtained whatever doctor’s note was required to get the same special treatment.
It’s a total farce.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:48 am to LSUDVM1999
I am sad to say that my kids have been doing it wrong. Likely explains their GPA being a quarter point lower than some of their obviously less talented classmates. 
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:49 am to LSUDVM1999
I know I'm old now, but this generation of overly-coddled idiots is becoming repetitive and tiresome.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:50 am to LSUDVM1999
Elite law schools are having the same problem
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:52 am to LSUDVM1999
My kids got into college and are nearly finished without any accommodations. At this point I feel like they’ve put themselves at a disadvantage by not claiming to be disabled.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:52 am to SouthPlains
Same here. I am in law school now, and our entire grade for a class is based on a single 3-hour exam, and half of my class is in another room taking it with either 1.5X or 2X the time.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:54 am to LSUDVM1999
SFPs favorite school that he didn’t go to
Posted on 2/2/26 at 11:57 am to Joshjrn
quote:
This isn't new; it was already a well known tactic back when I was taking the LSAT two decades ago. Getting extra time on an exam that is only difficult because of the extreme time crunch is a leg up that a lot of people couldn't resist taking. I imagine that has only proliferated since then.
People say this with a straight face too. It's bizarre.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 12:05 pm to SouthPlains
Law Schools will give you literally double the time if you claim even a slight disability. Which is so fricking annoying because time constraints are part of the difficulty of the test AND THEY GRADE EVERYONE ON THE SAME CURVE.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 12:08 pm to LSUDVM1999
The grift is the new American way.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 12:24 pm to LSUDVM1999
I don’t know, all things considered, it’s kinda weird to have your own room your whole life and then have to bunk up with someone, even one you don’t know well, just to go to college.
Most of us dealt with it but it seems such an unnecessary problem if your roommate sucks.
Most of us dealt with it but it seems such an unnecessary problem if your roommate sucks.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 12:59 pm to Havoc
quote:
I don’t know, all things considered, it’s kinda weird to have your own room your whole life
That's the thing, kids never had their own room growing up. You shared a room with your siblings. Boys shared a room, and the girls shared a room. Unless you were an only child and they were spoiled to begin with.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 1:00 pm to LSUDVM1999
Seems like getting into Stanford would be prima facie proof that you don’t have a disability.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 1:04 pm to LSUDVM1999
Well, they are leftists, so yeah, they are disabled in a way.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 1:07 pm to Joshjrn
quote:
This isn't new; it was already a well known tactic back when I was taking the LSAT two decades ago. Getting extra time on an exam that is only difficult because of the extreme time crunch is a leg up that a lot of people couldn't resist taking. I imagine that has only proliferated since then.
Was happening with the MCAT back in my day. I imagine that it is still going on.
Posted on 2/2/26 at 1:18 pm to LSUDVM1999
quote:
Nearly 40% of Stanford undergraduates claim they’re disabled.
Significantly lower than the percentage of non-combat vets that do the same.
And they get paid. For life..
Popular
Back to top

35














