- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Winter Olympics
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
263 page instapundent report up on Fulton County election 2020
Posted on 1/30/26 at 10:35 am
Posted on 1/30/26 at 10:35 am
Document put up by a Kevin Moncla that was completed about a week ago. 263 detailed pages. Describes about 40 counts in a fashion very similar to court documents. Names and receipts included. I only had time to scan but it looks like the real thing and will put Fulton County and state election folks in jail
Posted on 1/30/26 at 10:38 am to Trevaylin
Does any inner city run without corruption or just plain ignorance in this country?
There seems to be a common thread in these places.

There seems to be a common thread in these places.

Posted on 1/30/26 at 10:39 am to Trevaylin
Can’t wait to read this..


Posted on 1/30/26 at 10:47 am to Trevaylin
quote:
I only had time to scan but it looks like the real thing and will put Fulton County and state election folks in jail
Forgetting the link baw?
Posted on 1/30/26 at 10:49 am to SingleMalt1973
I do not have the IT skills to attach the document, It was put up on the instapundent board by glen Reynolds at 10:13. It would be a great service to TD readers if a skilled person reposted it here.
Posted on 1/30/26 at 11:05 am to Trevaylin
We got them now!
i sure hope so....
i sure hope so....
Posted on 1/30/26 at 11:05 am to loogaroo
quote:
Dis gonna be good.
For some of us, yeah it is good.
For others (election denier [deniers]), not so good.
Posted on 1/30/26 at 11:11 am to LemmyLives
probably less hard than doing tray to tray distillation calculations with a slide rule
thank you for the link, it looks like the real deal
thank you for the link, it looks like the real deal
Posted on 1/30/26 at 11:25 am to Trevaylin
GREAT!! - now let's do the blue state hell-scapes.
Posted on 1/30/26 at 2:19 pm to ChineseBandit58
This report just shows how dishonest those that deny the fraud are.
And, some of those guys are lawyers who, with a document like this, know exactly what is done.
I don't think SFP or Boosie will even respond to this it's so damning.
And, some of those guys are lawyers who, with a document like this, know exactly what is done.
I don't think SFP or Boosie will even respond to this it's so damning.
Posted on 1/30/26 at 2:22 pm to moneyg
quote:
I don't think SFP or Boosie will even respond to this it's so damning
Sweet summer child?
Is that you?
Posted on 1/30/26 at 2:28 pm to Trevaylin
And yet nothing will happen.
Posted on 1/30/26 at 2:28 pm to Trevaylin
Just got through reading it.


Posted on 1/30/26 at 3:04 pm to Trevaylin
MIT Election Data Science report - Based on the state's own reports - "almost 3/4 of the rejected ballots in the runoff election were successfully allowed to vote by mail in the general election two months prior."
So they were able to vote for the president, but for the state runoffs their ballots were rejected.
So they were able to vote for the president, but for the state runoffs their ballots were rejected.
Posted on 1/30/26 at 3:21 pm to moneyg
quote:
This report just shows how dishonest those that deny the fraud are.
Interesting that you point this out, because the primary author of this document is Kevin Moncla, who has stated his firm belief that that the Chinese and Italians altered and switched votes using satellites and laser technology. I'm not saying that the election was secure at all, but just consider the source. Also, Moncla spent some time in jail for the crime of videotaping women in public bathrooms.
Posted on 1/30/26 at 3:24 pm to Trevaylin
I figured they destroyed all evidence long ago.
Posted on 1/30/26 at 3:24 pm to Trevaylin
The first recount did not reconcile with the total by 17000 ballots.
They were ordered to reconcile and find the missing ballots. Over the next 24 hours most ballots were "found" still missing 852.
Additional investigation that still 17,853 ballot images were missing. 3,930 ballots had been scanned twice. Hundreds of test ballots were included in the re-count..
Thousands of ballots included in the Nov. 3rd count were not included in the recount and vice versa.
But there was no significant evidence the pointed to fraud that anyone could find ?
They were ordered to reconcile and find the missing ballots. Over the next 24 hours most ballots were "found" still missing 852.
Additional investigation that still 17,853 ballot images were missing. 3,930 ballots had been scanned twice. Hundreds of test ballots were included in the re-count..
Thousands of ballots included in the Nov. 3rd count were not included in the recount and vice versa.
But there was no significant evidence the pointed to fraud that anyone could find ?
Popular
Back to top

12









