Started By
Message

Let’s talk Braveheart

Posted on 1/21/26 at 10:40 pm
Posted by lsudave1
Baton Metairie
Member since Jan 2005
11942 posts
Posted on 1/21/26 at 10:40 pm
Sat down and watched the whole damn thing last night. I somehow had never seen the whole thing start to finish. What a movie. Here are some notes I have, I’d like to hear some from you baws.

- First of all, great score and cinematography

- William Wallace is the most likable ruthless serial killer ever

- I was not as annoyed by Robert the Bruce as I should have been, his dad sucked though

- Edward Longshanks is one of the best movie villains of all time. He should have made a very deep run in the most hated movie villain tournament on here

- Most importantly Sophie Marceau is so fine. I don’t know what it is but she is one of the most alluring characters I’ve ever seen in a movie


This post was edited on 1/21/26 at 10:41 pm
Posted by manwich
You've wanted my
Member since Oct 2008
52820 posts
Posted on 1/21/26 at 10:51 pm to
quote:

Sophie Marceau is so fine

Posted by JoeHackett
Member since Aug 2016
5124 posts
Posted on 1/21/26 at 11:12 pm to
The only thing I don't like about it is the love story between William and Sophie Marceau's character. It seems so unnecessary.

quote:

I was not as annoyed by Robert the Bruce


Outlaw King is worth watching too.
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
38273 posts
Posted on 1/21/26 at 11:28 pm to
quote:

I somehow had never seen the whole thing start to finish

Good god man.
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
66831 posts
Posted on 1/21/26 at 11:32 pm to
Not much else to say about it. Great movie with obviously a very tragic ending.
Posted by Gorilla Ball
Az
Member since Feb 2006
12950 posts
Posted on 1/21/26 at 11:35 pm to
I can’t handle the ending
Posted by Gavin Elster
Member since Mar 2020
3399 posts
Posted on 1/21/26 at 11:46 pm to
quote:

William Wallace is the most likable ruthless serial killer ever

What? Serial killer? No
Posted by NotoriousFSU
Atlanta, GA
Member since Oct 2008
12200 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 1:26 am to
Posted by DustyDinkleman
Here
Member since Feb 2012
19582 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 1:32 am to
It’s good for a feel-good popcorn flick and a loose telling of his life and exploits.

But it’s not historically accurate in much of its runtime.
Posted by Gusoline
Jacksonville, NC
Member since Dec 2013
10613 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 1:40 am to
quote:

The only thing I don't like about it is the love story between William and Sophie Marceau's character. It seems so unnecessary.


So unnecessary that in order to put it into an already long movie, they ignored that historically the real princess isabella was about 9 when real william wallace died
Posted by muttenstein
Member since Oct 2012
3088 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 5:09 am to
Ha! Just finished a rewatch 2 days ago.

One of my all time favorite movies. Also one of my best cinematic experiences seeing this the first time in the theatre. Beautiful score, beautiful scenery and incredible performances by Mel and several other actors. Yes, it's not historically accurate, but I don't care. I had a major thing for Sophie after seeing this movie.

I wish they would re-release this in theatres today.
This post was edited on 1/22/26 at 5:41 am
Posted by Tigerstark
Parts unknown
Member since Aug 2011
6890 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 5:38 am to
Fantastic movie.

You have to acknowledge the historical inaccuracies just since it sort of portrays itself as telling the history.

Always love the scene where Wallace starts speaking Latin and then French and that English a-hole is put off.

Only quibble - during several of the battle closeups the fighting in thr background is horribly slow and fake and not close to looking real. Kind of like in Rudy when one of the family is looking the wrong way from the others when Rudy gets to play you can’t unsee it once seen.
Posted by carhartt
Member since Feb 2013
8295 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 6:54 am to
Great movie. I put it up there with Shawshank Redemption as one of the best of the decade.
Posted by Loup
Ferriday
Member since Apr 2019
15982 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 7:20 am to
Man, I got a funny story about this one.

When I was a junior in high school, one of our projects was to write a paper about a movie and then dress up as a character from that movie. I picked Braveheart (I guess the teacher didn't realize there was nudity in it), and my mom decided to sew up a kilt for me to wear for the character dress up day. She went to google Images and searched for kilts. The first few images were normal pictures of Scottish dudes playing bagpipes or eating nasty looking food. Two rows down, there was a picture titled "Half Pounder in a Kilt." It was of a dude with his leg up and his big ole dong visible under the kilt. When my mom saw it, she screamed and started hitting the screen with the mouse. :
Posted by southpawcock
Member since Oct 2015
17340 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 7:47 am to
quote:

Sophie Marceau is so fine.


Dang, she got with her partner Andrzej Zulawski when he was 45 years old and she was 19. They were together until 2001. But she considers herself sapiosexual, so no one on TD has a chance.
This post was edited on 1/22/26 at 7:49 am
Posted by rebelrouser
Columbia, SC
Member since Feb 2013
12946 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 7:55 am to
quote:

But it’s not historically accurate in much of its runtime.


Do not watch The Patriot.
Posted by Richleau
Member since Dec 2018
4246 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 8:40 am to
William’s revenge on Longshanks’ policy of prima nocte. It’s vital to the story’s conclusion and the ultimate revenge on Longshank’s deathbed.
Posted by RLDSC FAN
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Member since Nov 2008
59242 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 8:46 am to
It's always been one of my favorites. I don't care that it's not historically accurate
Posted by Tiger Vision
Mandeville
Member since Jan 2005
3895 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 8:54 am to
Isn't there a fan remake where they cut up the footage and made it more historically accurate? I cant remember the name of it.


ETA: The most prominent one is called Braveheart – The Elerslie Edition, created by a fan editor known as CBB and released around 2011. It's available through fanedit communities like Fanedit.org.
This version:

Removes or reduces the romantic subplot with Princess Isabella (a major historical inaccuracy, since she was a child in France at the time and couldn't have had an affair with Wallace).

Trims the film's tone to reduce the "growing sadness" and make Wallace feel more like a heroic figure rather than a tragic romantic lead.

Shortens the runtime from the original ~177 minutes to about 126 minutes by cutting less accurate or melodramatic elements.

Aims for a "true, historically more accurate hero tale" with less romance and more focus on bravery and the core story.
This post was edited on 1/22/26 at 11:51 am
Posted by LSUPERMAN
Louisiana
Member since Aug 2007
2984 posts
Posted on 1/22/26 at 9:20 am to
quote:

Edward Longshanks is one of the best movie villains of all time. He should have made a very deep run in the most hated movie villain tournament on here


100% here. Between Longshanks and the Warden from Escape from Alcatraz, Patric Mcgoohan plays a great bad guy.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram