- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Why would any Republican be against voter ID?
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:08 am
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:08 am
It would insure they win more elections.
So why not support it?
So why not support it?
15
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:08 am to loogaroo
probably because they know they wouldn’t win in a fair election against other Republicans. They know they were installed.
well, that, and the fact that they have sold out and are spineless
well, that, and the fact that they have sold out and are spineless
This post was edited on 1/21/26 at 9:10 am
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:09 am to loogaroo
Grassley is saying his opposition is based on a states’ rights thing. He doesn’t want federal intervention on voting forced on the states.
Not saying I believe him, but that’s his stated reasoning.
Not saying I believe him, but that’s his stated reasoning.
This post was edited on 1/21/26 at 9:10 am
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:10 am to loogaroo
Why would anyone be against voter ID except wanting corruption in voting?
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:10 am to theunknownknight
quote:
probably because they know they wouldn’t win an affair election against other Republicans. They know they were installed.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:12 am to loogaroo
I can only think of one Republican like this - Massie. But, we all know he wants the Democrats to cheat/win.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:13 am to Timeoday
They have almost every seat planned out and have a selected minion.
Look how Turtle doled out election funds.
fricking establishment RINOS!
Look how Turtle doled out election funds.
fricking establishment RINOS!
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:13 am to theunknownknight
quote:
They know they were installed.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:14 am to lowhound
Because they are controlled opposition.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:14 am to loogaroo
As long as it isn't a "new ID" and just whatever state ID you already have I can't see the reason to be against it
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:14 am to loogaroo
RINOs benefit from the fraud just like the D Party Waterhead Babies
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:14 am to loogaroo
quote:
So why not support it?
Support it at the state or federal level seems to be the divide
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:15 am to VoxDawg
quote:
RINOs b
So "RINO" now means "upholds conservative values" (states rights)
MAGA redefining words is so weird. Leave that with the leftists.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:19 am to TheHarahanian
quote:
He doesn’t want federal intervention on voting forced on the states.
I'd be okay with that line of reasoning but for the fact there already IS federal intervention on voting forced on the states.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:22 am to loogaroo
Because, in the eyes of establishment GOP politicians, a Democrat in office is better than an America First Republican. Their grift stays alive and kicking under Democrat control ; it is threatened indefinitely if we peasants should take control - God forbid. The establishment Republicans do not like us. The establishment Republicans deplore the likes of DJT. The establishment Republicans and their families did not and do not vote for DJT or America First Republican candidates.. This can’t be stressed enough and needs to be understood.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:22 am to TheHarahanian
quote:
He doesn’t want federal intervention on voting forced on the states.
I can mostly understand this logic, if a state wants to be crazy then they can individually choose to be crazy.
But, in that context, I still don't think a "rogue" state should expect the rest of the nation to take it as seriously, and think it's hard to justify saying "yeah this huge outlier process that does things completely differently is still totally OK" in a FEDERAL level election.
We are the "United" States after all, and imo should be united in a federal election process
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:24 am to loogaroo
Given what has surfaced in recent elections how could anyone on the right look at this as a states rights issue. It’s more of a “states failed to do” rights issue.
The concept of needing an id in order to vote isn’t complicated and shouldn’t be debated. I know it is debated, but those debating against it are open to more questioning and also tend to align with those that like our borders open.
The concept of needing an id in order to vote isn’t complicated and shouldn’t be debated. I know it is debated, but those debating against it are open to more questioning and also tend to align with those that like our borders open.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:28 am to Bigdawgb
quote:
and think it's hard to justify saying "yeah this huge outlier process that does things completely differently is still totally OK" in a FEDERAL level election.
Why?
Everyone that those people vote for represent the state or the voters of that state. If the state is crazy, why would you think they wouldn't send crazy to our federal offices?
This is the very heart of states' rights and directly representing voters of that state.
This post was edited on 1/21/26 at 9:29 am
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:30 am to weptiger
quote:
Given what has surfaced in recent elections how could anyone on the right look at this as a states rights issue.
Because it's literally always been a states rights issue with many court cases supporting this, unless there is a specific amendment (like the 13th-15th) authorizing specific federal authority in the area.
Posted on 1/21/26 at 9:31 am to loogaroo
quote:
Why would any American be against voter ID?
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News