- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Easiest solution for the G5 problem
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:16 am
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:16 am
Probably didn’t need another thread on this but here it goes
You can:
A) Lock them out entirely
B) Do a play in like the NCAA Tournament
Best solution would be to shrink the CFP to 4 teams like it used to be. That was the perfect number
But they seem hellbent on expansion to grab more money so i expect they’ll either squeeze the smaller conferences out of the field
or give them the last play-in spot to reward the #1 overall seed
You can:
A) Lock them out entirely
B) Do a play in like the NCAA Tournament
Best solution would be to shrink the CFP to 4 teams like it used to be. That was the perfect number
But they seem hellbent on expansion to grab more money so i expect they’ll either squeeze the smaller conferences out of the field
or give them the last play-in spot to reward the #1 overall seed
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:19 am to Jacobowitz
Relegation solves everything.
Gives everyone a chance to win a NC, while also making the schedules closer to the same strength for playoff teams.
Gives everyone a chance to win a NC, while also making the schedules closer to the same strength for playoff teams.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:24 am to Jacobowitz
Top 10 teams auto-qualify. Highest 2 G5 conference champions and then 2 at-large (most likely teams 11 & 12).
First round is a play-in style on the campus of the two highest G5 champions against the 2 at-large.
Second round is just like the first round now.
You will not get the NCAA or the schools to contract the number of teams. It is too much money, especially going into the realm of revenue sharing. Expand it by a round and give the G5 teams a home game.
First round is a play-in style on the campus of the two highest G5 champions against the 2 at-large.
Second round is just like the first round now.
You will not get the NCAA or the schools to contract the number of teams. It is too much money, especially going into the realm of revenue sharing. Expand it by a round and give the G5 teams a home game.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:24 am to Jacobowitz
Let the best G5 team face Notre Dame in Indianapolis on New Years Day.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:30 am to Jacobowitz
I think this, the 4 millionth thread on the topic, is the one to actually get this done. Thanks for doing this
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:36 am to Jacobowitz
The 12 team format already has a play-in.
It basically functions as an 8 team tournament, but seeds 5-8 are determined by a play-in.
It basically functions as an 8 team tournament, but seeds 5-8 are determined by a play-in.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:41 am to Jacobowitz
quote:There are a shite ton of people who think it’s a crime if this year’s ACC Champion doesn’t get a crack at the playoffs.
Best solution would be to shrink the CFP to 4 teams like it used to be. That was the perfect number
Cant do just 4.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:42 am to Mingo Was His NameO
quote:Is this guy always a grouch?
Mingo Was His NameO
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:45 am to ReauxlTide222
quote:
Is this guy always a grouch?
This thread is pointless. The playoff isn’t going back to 4, there’s no point in discussing it.
And why yall get so damn worked up about the last team in who has no chance of winning either way is beyond me. JMU shouldn’t have been in, but it’s not like some juggernaut was left sitting on the sideline. There’s 4 teams that can actually win this year and yall are bitching an moaning about Tulane and JMU like teams like Tennessee and Michigan State haven’t gotten their arse clapped in the playoff
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:48 am to AwesomeSauce
quote:
You will not get the NCAA
NCAA has nothing to do with the playoffs.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 9:53 am to Dizz
quote:Fine, if you want to argue semantics, the CFP Board that manages the NCAA FBS national championship on behalf of the NCAA FBS conferences and teams will not contract the number of teams.
NCAA has nothing to do with the playoffs
Posted on 12/23/25 at 10:09 am to magildachunks
quote:
Relegation solves everything. Gives everyone a chance to win a NC, while also making the schedules closer to the same strength for playoff teams.
You’re very naïve if you think this is a possibility. Lsu and Alabama are never going to agree to the possibility of being relegated after two bad seasons.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 10:11 am to magildachunks
quote:
Relegation solves everything.
1hundo.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 10:45 am to Jacobowitz
If anyone is following the FBC playoffs, it has been fun and entertaining. The level of football is actually quite good. It has been good for these universities because it puts like teams against each other.
Sad but true, we have to admit that putting in Tulane and JMU in the playoffs seemed logical, however, it didn't seem reasonable. I would like to see someone, if it is the NCAA, to create another division that would allow conferences like AAC, CUSA, MAC, MW, PAC10, and the Sun Belt to have their own College Playoffs in Football. Just in Football, if they want to have it for Baseball, or Women's Sports, they can work that out.
But I think it would be better overall, generate greater interest for more colleges and their followers, make it where the top programs get a better chance of getting into the FBS playoffs (would Vanderbilt and Notre Dame been better games than throwing Tulane and JMU to the lions?). I think it would also help promote local High School football knowing even if a player didn't attend a SEC or Big 10 team, they could still play in a playoff game and get a good education.
Sad but true, we have to admit that putting in Tulane and JMU in the playoffs seemed logical, however, it didn't seem reasonable. I would like to see someone, if it is the NCAA, to create another division that would allow conferences like AAC, CUSA, MAC, MW, PAC10, and the Sun Belt to have their own College Playoffs in Football. Just in Football, if they want to have it for Baseball, or Women's Sports, they can work that out.
But I think it would be better overall, generate greater interest for more colleges and their followers, make it where the top programs get a better chance of getting into the FBS playoffs (would Vanderbilt and Notre Dame been better games than throwing Tulane and JMU to the lions?). I think it would also help promote local High School football knowing even if a player didn't attend a SEC or Big 10 team, they could still play in a playoff game and get a good education.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 10:45 am to Jacobowitz
a play-in just to get smoked
Posted on 12/23/25 at 10:49 am to Remnant
quote:
I would like to see someone, if it is the NCAA, to create another division that would allow conferences like AAC, CUSA, MAC, MW, PAC10, and the Sun Belt to have their own College Playoffs in Football
The year a G5 school is actually good and can’t get in the “big” playoff yall would lose your fricking minds
Posted on 12/23/25 at 10:52 am to Jacobowitz
quote:
didn’t need another thread on this
Posted on 12/23/25 at 11:01 am to Jacobowitz
As a graduate and fan of a G6 program, I honestly really don't give a shite anymore when it comes to football. Lawyers, both the ones suing the NCAA and the Get Gordon types buying players away from G6s to their favorite teams have fricked it all up.
At this point, Cajuns should go back to playing 2 money games a season, 3 if possible, do the bare minimum in football and divert the extra money game revenues to baseball. I know baseball still has the NIL and no-sit portal transfer thing, but at least then we can hope to retain some of our core best players from season to season.
Making these "student" athletes have to at least go back to sitting a season to transfer would help, and if they don't like it, then they should be told to go form their own little minor league or sit out and train until they're draft eligible or can tryout for an NFL team. But that won't happen, because again, lawyers. They'll sue and win.
At this point, Cajuns should go back to playing 2 money games a season, 3 if possible, do the bare minimum in football and divert the extra money game revenues to baseball. I know baseball still has the NIL and no-sit portal transfer thing, but at least then we can hope to retain some of our core best players from season to season.
Making these "student" athletes have to at least go back to sitting a season to transfer would help, and if they don't like it, then they should be told to go form their own little minor league or sit out and train until they're draft eligible or can tryout for an NFL team. But that won't happen, because again, lawyers. They'll sue and win.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 11:03 am to GeauxTigers123
quote:
Lsu and Alabama are never going to agree to the possibility of being relegated after two bad seasons.
True, though they probably wouldn't have to worry about that.
It's the Miss States and Rutgers of the college football world that would never agree to such a thing.
Posted on 12/23/25 at 12:35 pm to Jacobowitz
Let the SEC/B1G separate completely into their own thing.
Treat the remnants like actual collegiate sports. NCAA has a championship for D1 that does not break away. Implement relegation/promotion between FBS and FCS. Reinstitute and audit for academic requirements. Lean into the brand of "college" football.
Basically, implement all the stuff that would make college sports better, that we couldn't do because the SEC wouldn't allow it.
Treat the remnants like actual collegiate sports. NCAA has a championship for D1 that does not break away. Implement relegation/promotion between FBS and FCS. Reinstitute and audit for academic requirements. Lean into the brand of "college" football.
Basically, implement all the stuff that would make college sports better, that we couldn't do because the SEC wouldn't allow it.
Popular
Back to top

13









