The boring American document that terrifies the British Empire - plus Ukraine & Cartels

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.

quote:

---

For decades, a small club of global banks - centered in places like the City of London - made money by:
• Creating money from nothing
• Lending it back to everyone with interest
• Using regulation, taxes, and wars to guarantee repayment

The 2025 FSOC Report + the 2025 U.S. National Security Strategy together say:
“Game over. That system is now a national security threat.”

Not a policy tweak. A hard pivot.

First: what was the old game?

Imagine this like a rigged credit card for the whole world:
• Banks print money digitally (fractional-reserve banking)
• Governments borrow it
• Families pay inflation + interest
• Wars and crises justify more borrowing
• Regulators protect the banks, not households

Result:
• Debt grows faster than real work
• Middle class gets squeezed
• Banks never lose

That model only works if no one challenges it.

Now here’s what changed in 2025 and why it matters

• The FSOC Report says the quiet part out loud

FSOC = America’s top financial risk referee.

In 2025, FSOC officially declares:

Uncontrolled leverage, opaque intermediaries, offshore financial centers, and debt-driven instability are systemic threats.

Translation:
• Too much fake money
• Too much hidden risk
• Too much power outside Treasury control

This is the U.S. government publicly turning on the old banking model.

The U.S. National Security Strategy connects money to survival

This is the real hammer.

The National Security Strategy (NSS) says:
• Financial systems are weapons
• Debt dependency = foreign leverage
• Monetary sovereignty = national security

Translation:

“If another financial cartel can crash our economy, control our currency, or finance wars through debt - we are not free.”

That is a death sentence for external banking empires.

Why this hits the City of London hardest

The City of London isn’t just a place - it’s:
• Offshore banking
• Shadow leverage
• Regulatory arbitrage
• War financing pipelines
• Debt recycling machines

The new U.S. stance says:
• No more hidden intermediaries
• No more unlimited leverage
• No more foreign monetary control
• No more war-for-profit finance structures

Their advantage disappears when transparency, collateral, and real settlement are required.

What replaces it? (This is the part that matters to families)

Instead of:
• Printed debt
• Endless interest
• Inflation taxes
• Bailouts for banks

The shift is toward:
• Real-asset backing
• Transparent settlement
• Direct ownership
• No middlemen skimming every transaction
• Money that can’t be endlessly counterfeited

When money has rules again:
• Savings stop evaporating
• Work regains value
• Governments lose the ability to quietly steal via inflation
• Wars become harder to finance

Why this feels sudden (but isn’t)

This didn’t happen overnight.
• 2008 exposed the fraud
• 2020 broke the system
• 2022 showed currency weaponization
• 2025 formalizes the reset

FSOC = financial diagnosis
NSS = enforcement authority

Together they say:

“The old debt-enslavement model is no longer compatible with a free nation.”

The Bottom-line Truth

If you strip away all politics and finance language:
• You were never bad with money
• The system was designed to drain you
• That system is now officially labeled a threat
• The rules are changing in favor of real work, real value, and real ownership

This isn’t about left vs right.
It’s families vs a rigged financial game.

And for the first time since 1963,
the rigged system is being exposed and ended by our 47th U.S. @POTUS.

---

quote:

---

(to get judges to find you this bad off is incredibly rare and difficult)

---

quote:

---

But if a person is found to be too "sick in the head" to stand trial (to get judges to find you this bad off is incredibly rare and difficult) is not someone who I would trust with giving me the lowdown on facts.

---

quote:

---

British Empire

---

quote:

---

banking

---

quote:

---

lol @ you trying to discredit the speaker & not what is said

---