- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Trump: Free Tina Peters - or else
Posted on 11/17/25 at 11:31 am
Posted on 11/17/25 at 11:31 am
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Joe Hoft - JACK SMITH MAY HAVE HANDED PRESIDENT TRUMP THE GOLDEN KEY TO PARDON TINA PETERS
quote:
. . . there was ample evidence that the federal government under Biden was involved in the Tina Peters case. There is an argument that if the federal government led the effort, directed it, or was a significant part of the effort to indict and imprison Tina Peters, it would give President Trump the ability to pardon her.
Also apparently Mike Lindell (invited Tina Peter’s to his symposium) is one of those illegally spied on by the Arctic Frost operation.
Emails were found with CO prosecutors worried about the ethical issues and possible repercussions of going forward with the prosecution of Tina Peters, which apparently they were under pressure from the feds to do.
This post was edited on 11/17/25 at 11:34 am
13
Posted on 11/17/25 at 11:47 am to Kjnstkmn
quote:
Emails were found with CO prosecutors worried about the ethical issues and possible repercussions of going forward with the prosecution of Tina Peters, which apparently they were under pressure from the feds to do.
Wasn't this already known? Why are we recycling old news? They were just doing their jobs! - signed, you know who.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 11:53 am to Kjnstkmn
I’m looking forward to seeing the list of potential “harsh measures”
Posted on 11/17/25 at 12:04 pm to Kjnstkmn
I am going to take harsh measures!!!
Posted on 11/17/25 at 12:07 pm to Kjnstkmn
Or else...what?
I think Tina Peters is a patriot who was vindictively prosecuted because she exposed how Dominion could steal elections. What happened to her was a tragedy.
Unfortunately, Trump's hands are tied. He cannot pardon her. She was convicted in state court. No amount of federal involvement in her prosecution can change the fact that she is in Colorado's custody.
I think Tina Peters is a patriot who was vindictively prosecuted because she exposed how Dominion could steal elections. What happened to her was a tragedy.
Unfortunately, Trump's hands are tied. He cannot pardon her. She was convicted in state court. No amount of federal involvement in her prosecution can change the fact that she is in Colorado's custody.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 12:10 pm to Kjnstkmn
DP
This post was edited on 11/17/25 at 12:12 pm
Posted on 11/17/25 at 12:58 pm to Kjnstkmn
This is dumb even for MAGA content creators. 
Posted on 11/17/25 at 12:59 pm to Kjnstkmn
quote:
or else
Or else............what?
Posted on 11/17/25 at 1:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
This is dumb even for MAGA content creators.
Explain "what" is dumb. It's likely your understanding of what is going on, but i want your take.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 1:09 pm to BugAC
quote:
Explain "what" is dumb
The whole theory.
First, claiming that the searches were illegal, is wrong. There are arguments that the ones against pols were politically motivated, but that doesn't even apply here, since the target was Lindell.
Second, extrapolating Lindell to Peters. Major leap of logic. We all know Lindell was super deep in multiple districts, so his behavior relating to Mesa County shouldn't shock anyone that it led to deeper investigations.
Third, trying to turn a state prosecution into something that Trump can pardon is utter nonsense. Ignoring the 2 issues above, that still wouldn't work.
So basically he built this theory on a lie (the illegality of the searches) and then connected dots improperly to permit him to selectively cherry pick certain data to give enough red meat to the true believers to think that it makes sense.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 1:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 11/17/25 at 1:23 pm to newmexicotiger
quote:
I am going to take harsh measures!!!
what a fricking loser
he isn't going to do jack shite for that traitor
Posted on 11/17/25 at 1:32 pm to beaux duke
quote:i bet you'd turn your own parents in if the government told you to, comrade.
what a fricking loser
he isn't going to do jack shite for that traitor
Posted on 11/17/25 at 1:44 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Or else...what?
He will write another sternly worded 3am Tweet, but this time he will add
Thank you for your attention to this matter!
Posted on 11/17/25 at 5:40 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
No amount of federal involvement in her prosecution can change the fact that she is in Colorado's custody.
Boys we took you Space Command, ya wanna talk about federally funding for ALL the programs, pick a rocky mountain to die on..........
Posted on 11/17/25 at 5:45 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Maybe you should read the article rather than vomiting all over the thread with low information post. Let me help you
quote:
Before today, there was ample evidence that the federal government under Biden was involved in the Tina Peters case. There is an argument that if the federal government led the effort, directed it, or was a significant part of the effort to indict and imprison Tina Peters, it would give President Trump the ability to pardon her.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 5:51 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
since the target was Lindell.
I am not familiar with this case at all. My question is if Lindell was the target and it is shown the surveillance was illegal, would it be fruit of the poisonous tree? Honestly not sure if that is a possibility here.
Posted on 11/17/25 at 5:53 pm to Bourre
quote:
There is an argument that if the federal government led the effort, directed it, or was a significant part of the effort to indict and imprison Tina Peters, it would give President Trump the ability to pardon her.
I read it. It's a baseless argument. I generally like Gateway Pundit and take it seriously. Here there was no substance, no citations, only an alleged conversation with a top Trump attorney.
This post was edited on 11/17/25 at 5:58 pm
Posted on 11/17/25 at 5:59 pm to Kjnstkmn
quote:
Emails were found with CO prosecutors worried about the ethical issues and possible repercussions of going forward with the prosecution of Tina Peters, which apparently they were under pressure from the feds to do.
Do you have a link to evidence of the Feds pressuring Colorado to prosecute Peters?
Posted on 11/17/25 at 6:02 pm to BBONDS25
quote:
My question is if Lindell was the target and it is shown the surveillance was illegal, would it be fruit of the poisonous tree? Honestly not sure if that is a possibility here.
None of that was used at her trial, as they had plenty to show her criminality and fraud without any need for that sort information.
Her case is built around her using a third party's access card to access sensitive voter data fraudulently and then transferring that data to a different, unauthorized third party (for analysis by one of Lindell's operations).
She tried to claim some cockamamie "whistleblower" defense.
Basically, she was a lady who was going through psychological trauma due to losing a child and people working with Mike Lindell manipulated her into doing bad shite on their behalf.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News