- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Women in NYC voted for this, should good men risk their lives and freedom to defend them?
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:40 am
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:40 am
If you are on this train, a few things you would have to consider before stepping in:
Women in NYC voted for Mandami at 85%, and Kamala something like 95%+
She almost certainly voted for this
You step in to defend her and restrain this fat slob, he may stab or shoot you (it’s illegal for you to carry). Or even if you are successful in restraining him, you will be prosecuted facing a long prison sentence. If you have children, that means depriving your children of their father for a long time or even their lifetime.
Should men be chivalrous and protective to random women when they have “equal rights” and can vote certain ways that makes being protective of them more difficult? It seems women want their cake (voting and equal rights) and want to eat it too (be protected and taken care of)
Women in NYC voted for Mandami at 85%, and Kamala something like 95%+
She almost certainly voted for this
You step in to defend her and restrain this fat slob, he may stab or shoot you (it’s illegal for you to carry). Or even if you are successful in restraining him, you will be prosecuted facing a long prison sentence. If you have children, that means depriving your children of their father for a long time or even their lifetime.
Should men be chivalrous and protective to random women when they have “equal rights” and can vote certain ways that makes being protective of them more difficult? It seems women want their cake (voting and equal rights) and want to eat it too (be protected and taken care of)
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. This post was edited on 11/11/25 at 10:46 am
27
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:43 am to burger bearcat
Such a wonderful place to live.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:43 am to burger bearcat
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:47 am to burger bearcat
Men must fight their own intuition to help them, obviously. But our intuition has been removed by their vote.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:48 am to burger bearcat
Daniel Penny did and was arrested and put on trial for murder. Just walk away.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:50 am to burger bearcat
John Rocker was right.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:55 am to burger bearcat
quote:
Should men be chauvinistic and protective to random women when they have “equal rights” and can vote certain ways that makes being protective of them more difficult?
We should always defend women, regardless of politics.
quote:
You step in to defend her and restrain this fat slob
I don’t know what started the argument, but I wouldn’t try to restrain him unless he attacked her. I would either try to calm him down or try to separate them.
Two strangers can argue with each other, but a line is crossed when a man attacks a 100-lb woman. He thankfully never did that.
This post was edited on 11/11/25 at 10:58 am
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:00 am to burger bearcat
Duhversity is their strength!!
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:01 am to burger bearcat
No. We risk our lives for the future of our children. Not for these women
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:03 am to burger bearcat
quote:
Women in NYC voted for this, should good men risk their lives and freedom to defend them?
Nope. Men will just get Daniel Penny'd. No good deed goes unpunished with these leftist losers.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:03 am to burger bearcat
Daniel Penny GTFO of NYC
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:06 am to burger bearcat
Well, she made it out without being assaulted or murdered. So I'd say it worked out in a best case scenario.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:10 am to LordSaintly
quote:
We should always defend women, regardless of politics.
Living by this mantra irrespective of rational application of context is foolish IMO.
My wife and family need me before I risk my life and freedom protecting some woman I don't know who may well be a Communist who hates me and my family and is pursuing the destruction of the values I hold. I will use my judgment in respect to when and how I determine who to defend.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:13 am to LordSaintly
I'm not risking my life or freedom unless it's for a friend of family member in this situation. That's what the new "mental health counselors" are for. Not sorry about that at all.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:13 am to LordSaintly
(no message)
This post was edited on 11/11/25 at 11:14 am
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:23 am to ChewyDante
quote:
Living by this mantra irrespective of rational application of context is foolish IMO
I agree with this and the rest of your post. Context always matters. I should have said that.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:24 am to LordSaintly
quote:
Two strangers can argue with each other, but a line is crossed when a man attacks a 100-lb woman. He thankfully never did that.
That was definitely an assault and criminal behavior
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:26 am to burger bearcat
The classic roles are:
Men support civilization.
Women support life.
Well, with their no child feminism and abortion, they haven't been holding up their end very well.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:28 am to burger bearcat
Just do like everyone else on that train and just record it with your phone.
Page 1 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News