Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message

Personal Injury Attorney Fee Structure

Posted on 11/6/25 at 2:25 pm
Posted by ChairmanOfThisBoard
Member since Mar 2010
165 posts
Posted on 11/6/25 at 2:25 pm
Anyone familiar with the math on a personal injury lawsuit settlement? I assume the lawyers recap any out of pocket expense to cover medical cost, plus an 30%-40% on additional monies recovered. My trashy admin lady was rear ended, received four or five steroid shots and thinks she's going to pocket $200K.
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
174769 posts
Posted on 11/6/25 at 2:31 pm to
250k payout
35% to attorney
then deduct doctor visits, x rays, mri's, procedures, hospital costs, and whatevers else maybe at least 35k-65k.
payout likely inbetween 100-135k

Posted by vistajay
Member since Oct 2012
2793 posts
Posted on 11/6/25 at 3:04 pm to
Most Louisiana personal injury attorneys will apply a contingency fee off the top of the gross settlement, then deduct case expenses. The contingency fee is usually 1/3 pre-suit , 40% post filing of suit and 50% if goes to trial or appeal. But contracts vary.
Posted by Mr.Perfect
Louisiana
Member since Mar 2013
17532 posts
Posted on 11/6/25 at 8:04 pm to
Claimant ultimately ends up with about 1/3 of the settlement. Not a lot when you consider the insane amount of unnecessary treatment and destruction done to their body. The attorney and the doctor end up with the other 2/3 and leave the claimant for the next sucker.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
134885 posts
Posted on 11/8/25 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

and the doctor
Posted by Neauxla
New Orleans
Member since Feb 2008
33958 posts
Posted on 11/8/25 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

My trashy admin lady was rear ended, received four or five steroid shots and thinks she's going to pocket $200K.
why is she trashy?
Posted by go ta hell ole miss
Member since Jan 2007
14420 posts
Posted on 11/8/25 at 8:05 pm to
quote:

why is she trashy?

Probably has something to do with her boss
Posted by HighlyFavoredTiger
TexLaArk
Member since Jun 2018
931 posts
Posted on 11/8/25 at 8:06 pm to
I know someone that was broad sided by a big truck, their lawyers took 3 years to settle the case, they also got another lawyer from out of state involved, ended up settling out of court with trucking companies lawyers, amount of insurance was 1.45 million, attorneys took exactly 49%. My friend got inured for life and screwed over by their attorneys.
Posted by dblwall
Member since Jul 2017
1050 posts
Posted on 11/8/25 at 9:20 pm to
What's worse than a bus full of lawyers going off a cliff?

A half full bus of lawyers going off a cliff.
Posted by NaturalBeam
Member since Sep 2007
14722 posts
Posted on 11/8/25 at 9:24 pm to
quote:

attorneys took exactly 49%
Some of this is reimbursement for expenses, so that’s a little misleading. The lawyers would’ve likely taken 33, 35, or 40%. Never heard of a “49%” contract.
Posted by HighlyFavoredTiger
TexLaArk
Member since Jun 2018
931 posts
Posted on 11/8/25 at 11:28 pm to
It wasn’t a 49% contract, it was a contract to be represented and they would never talk about money or amounts or possible maybes or anything. They drug it out for 3 years, mainly because they were working on another case that ended hugely and instead of saying they didn’t really want the case or have time for it, they strung it out for 3 years, finally admitted that they couldn’t finish the case because it was in another state, so they had to bring in a lawyer from that state to help bring them to an offer.
I saw my friends final run down from his team of lawyers, they had added cost from subject matter experts, photographers, administrative workers, other lawyers, damn near everyone but their janitor, copies of this and that, you name it, I can tell you for a fact, the final offer was $1.45 million and my friend got $752 thou and the lawyers took $689 thou., period. That’s close enough to 49%.
This post was edited on 11/8/25 at 11:36 pm
Posted by NaturalBeam
Member since Sep 2007
14722 posts
Posted on 11/9/25 at 8:14 am to
So, reimbursement for expenses, like I said.
Posted by OTIS2
NoLA
Member since Jul 2008
52124 posts
Posted on 11/9/25 at 8:27 am to
You think that litigation is expense free? Or even cheap? Goodness.

I expect medical liens took 1/3 of his money.
Posted by NaturalBeam
Member since Sep 2007
14722 posts
Posted on 11/9/25 at 8:40 am to
To clear more than half of the gross settlement is doing well. It sounds like there weren’t much in medical bills, all things considered (if there were, a lot more of his money would’ve gone to those bills/liens), so that’s a pretty good result.
This post was edited on 11/9/25 at 8:41 am
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
134888 posts
Posted on 11/9/25 at 10:05 am to
Attorney 33%, if trial 40% plus expenses
Posted by slinger1317
Northshore
Member since Sep 2005
6793 posts
Posted on 11/9/25 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

why is she trashy?


Because simpletons and low iq people believe getting in a fender bender should equal a lottery ticket for themselves.
Posted by Fun Bunch
New Orleans
Member since May 2008
127668 posts
Posted on 11/11/25 at 4:56 pm to
You seem like an idiot that doesn’t have a clue what they are talking about. Most plaintiffs receive 35-40% of total award so if they got 51 they are doing spectacular

And 3 years isn’t very long at all for a case of that size. Definitely not being delayed or drug out
Posted by SilverPoon985
NE Pass / W Delta
Member since Jun 2025
51 posts
Posted on 11/12/25 at 9:21 am to
Your post asks two separate questions.

1) Most law firms operate those kind of cases on contingency, meaning the claimant owes nothing until verdict/settlement. General contingency fee is 30-40% across the board in Louisiana, staying closer to the 33-35% range - with a kicker if it goes to trial the contingency fee jumps to 40%.

The contingency fee generally does not cover case expenses/liens/subrogations: such as filings, deposition costs, trial prep costs (exhibits), court filing fees, expert fees, etc. Those are deducted from the gross amount after verdict/settlement.

So for example: say a case settled for $100k - to get to that the attorney had to depose the tortfeasor and the insurance adjuster, file a motion to compel, take a writ on a Motion to Quash 1442 deposition of insurance adjuster, get the police report, and request medical records which lets hypothetically say in total cost $8.5k. In this hypo: the client incurred $25k of medical treatment via their BCBS membership (actual paid amount by BCBS was $6,250 and a write off of $18,750 was applied). BCBS would notice a lien on the file for reimbursement of the $6,250. The attorney would then negotiate with the insurer, this case BCBS for a reduction in the lien pursuant to Moody.(a legal case which generally reduces the lien by 1/3)

So the math would go like this:

Gross Settlement: $100,000.00
Att Fee (33%) ($33,000.00)
Expenses on File: ($8,5000.00)
BCBS Lien (negotiated): ($4,166.67)
Net to Claimant: $54,333.33

Obviously, this is just a hypothetical with fictitious numbers for expenses and liens

2)Regarding the value/"math" of what a case is worth - the math comes down to multiple factors: what type of injections (ESI, MBB, RFAs), what other type of treatment (PT/Chiro), if liability is established/contested, treatment span (date of loss to last date of treatment), need for future medical treatment, the venue (jurisdiction) the case is pending, willingness of claimant to go to trial, egregiousness of the actions of tortfeasor (person who did the wrong action), and likeability/personality of the claimant.

I've seen the same treatment, treatment span, and medical specials go to vastly different conclusions based on 1) venue 2) likeability/personality of claimant, 3) actions of tortfeasor, and/or 4) willingness to go to trial.



Posted by SaintsTiger
1,000,000 Posts
Member since Oct 2014
1872 posts
Posted on 11/12/25 at 3:15 pm to
quote:

It wasn’t a 49% contract, it was a contract to be represented and they would never talk about money or amounts or possible maybes or anything. They drug it out for 3 years, mainly because they were working on another case that ended hugely and instead of saying they didn’t really want the case or have time for it, they strung it out for 3 years, finally admitted that they couldn’t finish the case because it was in another state, so they had to bring in a lawyer from that state to help bring them to an offer. I saw my friends final run down from his team of lawyers, they had added cost from subject matter experts, photographers, administrative workers, other lawyers, damn near everyone but their janitor, copies of this and that, you name it, I can tell you for a fact, the final offer was $1.45 million and my friend got $752 thou and the lawyers took $689 thou., period. That’s close enough to 49%.


On the other hand, a quick settlement with no investment into experts to help prove up the case, you would be calling your friend’s $150,000 net a joke because her firm was a settlement mill.

—-
These guys would have had to hire tons of experts, dealt with shite loads of depositions, motions to dismiss, appeals, etc. just to keep the case alive.

Do you really think they could have settled it for $1,500,000 in 6 months but decided not to?

Do you really think they hired teams of unneeded lawyers for fun?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram