Significance of Denbrock leaving for Notre Dame?

I don’t think it would have mattered much. You had Mason Taylor, JD5, Nabors, and BTJ all at the same time. You also had two great tackles on the edge. These guys made everybody, including Denbrock, look better than they were.

Joe Sloan would have had to leave or be given the door for that to even been close to happening.

The truth was Sloan was a lazy promotion. Hankton should have remained WR coach only, and Sloan at QB coach. If they didn’t like it he should have let them walk. We had just had one of the greatest offenses in recent college football. He could have easily found a great OC ready to get his hands on the talent we had.

Of course. I realize he was lucky to have Jayden here, but the guy is proven at multiple schools. His offenses have an identity.

Just look at the rushing stats. While Jayden likely skewed them, the bottom line is the run game was better. Guys like Diggs and a walk-on were effective a couple years ago etc.

When he left, the rushing numbers instantly went to the very bottom of the league, even though the 2024 OLine was better equipped than the 2023 OLine that Denbrock had.

LSU’s offense has no identity now, and that’s the worst part. It feels like true sandlot football where they think one play at a time. There is never projected confidence for what they are doing, which clearly shows from the first drive when any competent offense should have scheme advantages over a defense that they prepared for. Not us, we go 3-and-out. You can just tell the culture of awful on that side of the ball by how often they get mauled on the OLine off the snap.

quote:

---

BK’s big problem is not moving on from House and Sloan quickly enough

---

That's easy to say with the benefit of hindsight.

However, in 2022 it was the defense that carried the team to multiple victories that year. Fans remember the 2023 offense but seem to forget Daniels struggled at times in 2022 and MANY on here wanted him benched for the current QB.

Last year LSU had a top 20 offense (total offense). It was the defense that, more often than not, had the struggles. While there were certainly flaws with the offense (horrible running game approach; struggles in the RZ; inexplicable attacking then abandoning the middle of the field in the passing game), it wasn't a "bad" offense.

In neither case was there reason to expect either unit would fall off so drastically the following year. So I don't think it fair to say there was clear evidence at the time that Kelly should have moved on from either coordinator. What's more accurate is Kelly and his staff weren't proactive in identifying and accepting the potential weaknesses ahead of the following year and being proactive to get ahead of them.

This year's offense has talent. But like any team, it also has weaknesses. Yet, the offensive approach is EXACTLY the same from last year. LSU didn't address any of their weaknesses. It appears the staff, including Kelly, doesn't think there is anything wrong with the overall approach. They think the guys just aren't executing it well. When 13, 14, 17 difference players aren't executing well it's not a THEM problem. It's a YOU problem

Or maybe it is because he is 61 and has spent most of his career in the Great Lakes region?

It is frustrating that he made a good OC hire that was proven and at the same hired a DC that was inexperienced as a DC.
Then he made a good DC hire and promoted an inexperienced OC. Why is he deciding to hire an experienced coordinator on one side of the ball and inexperienced on the other.
So we have to hope that Baker stays and BK hires a quality OC. Not too mention keeping qbs.

Nuss had a decent OL last year. This year he is scared in the pocket and then factor in his injury. Im willing to give some space Nuss considering his injury and terrible OL. Then you have an OC that doesnt know how to plan or call plays to help a poor OL.

quote:

---

There is never projected confidence for what they are doing, which clearly shows from the first drive when any competent offense should have scheme advantages over a defense that they prepared for. Not us, we go 3-and-out.

---

You make a good point. It seems there a statistics for every aspect of CFB. OTOH, i've never seen a stat for a team's percentage of three and outs vs TDs vs FGs on it's first drive of the game. It seems like we've scored on the first drive of game very few times. Conversely, those should be some of your most productive drives.