- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Help me understand the phrase ‘Last but not least’
Posted on 10/12/25 at 6:36 pm
Posted on 10/12/25 at 6:36 pm
I get that it is trying to say that an entry in a list isn’t implied to be the least just because it is last.
However, does that mean another entry somewhere in the list is least? Or something not even on the list is least?
People say ‘last but not least’ all the time, but I wonder if it is more a reflex than a conscious choice.
However, does that mean another entry somewhere in the list is least? Or something not even on the list is least?
People say ‘last but not least’ all the time, but I wonder if it is more a reflex than a conscious choice.
Posted on 10/12/25 at 6:40 pm to weagle1999
Pretty simple, imagine rambling off something on a list….you simply want the people listening to realize that just because you are mentioning them last, doesn’t mean they are less important/valuable/etc than the rest
Posted on 10/12/25 at 6:42 pm to LsuTool
He should date that chick that takes herself serious
Posted on 10/12/25 at 6:42 pm to IT_Dawg
But doesn’t the wording imply that something is least?
Posted on 10/12/25 at 6:45 pm to weagle1999
Auburn is a perfect example of "last. but not least" for 2025.
Thanks,
refs
Thanks,
refs
Posted on 10/12/25 at 6:46 pm to East Coast Band
Auburn is a great example of last and least this year 
Posted on 10/12/25 at 6:49 pm to weagle1999
Have an upvote... I like weagle musings.
Furthermore, people should begin their list with "first, but not foremost".
Furthermore, people should begin their list with "first, but not foremost".
Posted on 10/12/25 at 7:06 pm to weagle1999
You're thinking about it too much. Don't hurt yourself.
Posted on 10/12/25 at 7:12 pm to weagle1999
It means everything he said was important. Also lets you know he’s finally almost finished rambling. Didn’t everyone have a professor like this?
Posted on 10/12/25 at 7:12 pm to weagle1999
It implies there is a least. Especially occurs when listing or introducing multiple people.
Posted on 10/12/25 at 7:53 pm to weagle1999
Last point I'm making but it's not the least important point.
Posted on 10/12/25 at 10:13 pm to weagle1999
you're certainly no jack handey...
Posted on 10/12/25 at 10:16 pm to weagle1999
it originates in biblical principle
Posted on 10/12/25 at 10:33 pm to weagle1999
It’s inferring that you are not using a ranked or ordered list. None of the things are more important than the other.
It’s not a phrase typically used regarding competition.
It’s not a phrase typically used regarding competition.
Posted on 10/12/25 at 11:06 pm to weagle1999
Don’t overthink it. It’s just a consolation for the last thing mentioned.
Posted on 10/12/25 at 11:10 pm to weagle1999
But doesn’t the wording imply that something is least?"
No, it does not. You're workin' too hard. PERIOD.
No, it does not. You're workin' too hard. PERIOD.
Posted on 10/13/25 at 6:39 am to weagle1999
quote:
However, does that mean another entry somewhere in the list is least? Or something not even on the list is least?
Yes, yes it does mean that.
Why is that a problem?
It masks who or what is 'least' in the list.
If you list off a hundred names and say "last but not least" all it does it eliminate the last name from being least out of hundred. If you hadn't said that, one might assume the last person is indeed least. But since you had said that, nobody can possibly guess who is least, therefore nobody listed is under suspicion of being least.
Popular
Back to top

19










