Started By
Message

U.S. Oil Majors cutting jobs despite pro-oil & gas policy changes

Posted on 9/15/25 at 8:36 am
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
27091 posts
Posted on 9/15/25 at 8:36 am
quote:

As the United States President Trump administration encourages oil and gas companies to increase production, introducing a wide range of policies to support the expansion of fossil fuels, several U.S. companies are announcing widespread job cuts. Despite major oil and gas production expansion in the U.S. over the last few years and the potential for further growth, several oil majors have been forced to cut thousands of jobs over the last year.

Since the Covid-19 pandemic, we have seen the era of the “megamerger”, with several U.S. oil majors acquiring smaller companies and expanding operations at home and abroad. Since 2023, Chevron, Exxon, ConocoPhillips, and Occidental have all acquired smaller fossil fuel companies to increase their production capacity. However, in recent months, many of these oil giants have been forced to lay off thousands of workers in the face of lower oil prices to cut costs.

In September, Texas-based ConocoPhillips announced plans to cut up to 25 percent of its global staff, or as many as 3,250 people, most of whom would be gone by the end of the year. The firm currently employs around 13,000 people. Dennis Nuss, a company spokesman, said in a statement, “We are always looking at how we can be more efficient with the resources we have.” ConocoPhillips completed its $17 billion acquisition of Marathon Oil this time last year, significantly expanding operations, as well as increasing the number of workers under its management.

The Trump administration has introduced a plethora of new policies aimed at accelerating oil and gas permitting and enhancing access to federal land for exploration, moves that are expected to spur greater fossil fuel exploration and production in the coming years. However, some of these policies will take several years to come into effect. All the while, fossil fuel companies that have spent heavily on major acquisitions in recent years are battling low profits.

Although oil prices have increased in recent months, they are nowhere near the post-pandemic highs that were seen a couple of years ago. The average price of crude in the U.S. has been around $64 a barrel this year, meaning companies have been able to continue drilling but not make such a high profit as in previous years. This led ConocoPhillips' profits to decrease by 15 percent year on year, to $2 billion in the second quarter.

Earlier in the year, the United States' second-largest oil company, Chevron, also announced plans to lay off up to 20 percent of its workforce by 2026, which could amount to as many as 9,000 people. In May, Chevron laid off 800 employees in the Permian basin as part of cost-cutting plans, following 600 layoffs in California earlier in the month.


quote:

Halliburton and the oilfield service company SLB also announced they would be reducing their workforces earlier this year. Lower oil prices have made 22 public U.S. producers in total – not including Exxon or Chevron – cut their capital spending by $2 billion, according to a Reuters analysis of second-quarter earnings announcements.

In recent months, the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies in the OPEC+ have fought to win back market share that was lost to the United States and other producers in recent years. After several years of strict quotas on oil output, OPEC+ announced plans to increase production by 137,000 barrels per day starting in October, which could drive down global oil prices.


quote:

The number of U.S. rigs in operation has fallen this year, by around 69 to 414, according to Baker Hughes. Kirk Edwards, the president of Texas-based Latigo Petroleum, said, “We've gone from ‘drill, baby, drill' to 'wait, baby wait’ here in the Permian.” Many U.S. producers are waiting for oil prices to increase before they raise production, requiring between $70 and $75 a barrel to put rigs back into operation.

The decision to cut spending by many U.S. oil and gas majors, which follows a post-pandemic era of megamergers and high spending, has resulted in widespread job cuts. As OPEC+ looks to increase production in the coming months, we can expect the low oil price trend to continue, likely resulting in low profits for several U.S. companies, and cautious spending plans are expected for the coming months.


LINK
Posted by castorinho
13623 posts
Member since Nov 2010
85762 posts
Posted on 9/15/25 at 8:41 am to
quote:

many of these oil giants have been forced
Ehh, they're choosing to, in the name of efficiency. Which is fine, but to say they're forced is a bit too much.
Posted by AllDayEveryDay
Nawf Tejas
Member since Jun 2015
9083 posts
Posted on 9/15/25 at 8:44 am to
Seems they are realizing they didn't need all the people they acquired when buying all those smaller companies.
Posted by DarthRebel
Tier Five is Alive
Member since Feb 2013
24416 posts
Posted on 9/15/25 at 8:56 am to
quote:

Seems they are realizing they didn't need all the people they acquired when buying all those smaller companies.


This.

Bloat in the human capital segment is not efficient.
Posted by slidingstop
Member since Jan 2025
1606 posts
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:00 am to
how many of these layoffs are in "green energy" that the majors have been abandoning or scaling back on due to the realization that "green energy" isn't what its cracked up to be?

I would also assume that since the price of oil is in the basement- a good thing for retail consumers- its not completely unexpected that less exploration is happening leading to some of these job cuts.
Posted by TexasTiger89
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2005
26253 posts
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:04 am to
Chevron bought Hess which the purchase was just approved by the Feds. This is the main reason they are letting people go. Consolidation.
Posted by TexasTiger89
Houston, TX
Member since Feb 2005
26253 posts
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:05 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 9/15/25 at 9:06 am
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
74560 posts
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:10 am to
I know nothing about the oil and gas industry but I thought I remembered someone saying that the drilling technology has become way more efficient the last decade or so and that means not as many jobs are needed.

Is that accurate or am i misunderstanding?
This post was edited on 9/15/25 at 9:11 am
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
75953 posts
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:13 am to
That's true.

Should note that in general O&G is struggling. Low oil prices and low pump prices have been squeezing margins everywhere.
Posted by Potchafa
Avoyelles
Member since Jul 2016
4140 posts
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:18 am to
Sitting on my drillship reading this. Glad I'm closer than further to my retirement date 2030. Hope it holds out for 4 more years. No one in this industry is above being cut. Been in it for 27 years now. It's been very fruitful and provided a life I would have never dreamed of. Sacrificing half my life out here is worth for my family!
Posted by Tiger Ryno
#WoF
Member since Feb 2007
107289 posts
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:25 am to
Yes. The tech now is insane. You could drill a well from the home office if you wanted to with nobody at the site.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
27091 posts
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:32 am to
quote:

You could drill a well from the home office if you wanted to with nobody at the site.


Yeah…let’s not try that just yet.
Posted by ragincajun03
Member since Nov 2007
27091 posts
Posted on 9/15/25 at 9:46 am to
quote:

how many of these layoffs are in "green energy" that the majors have been abandoning or scaling back on due to the realization that "green energy" isn't what its cracked up to be?


Some, but it's still pretty significant on the actual O&G Business Units.

While companies like BP, Exxon and Occidental went pretty heavy on "green energy" initiatives, whether solar development like BP with it's BP Lightsource BU, or carbon capture/sequestration like Exxon and Occidental, Chevron and Conoco didn't go so heavy in that sector. Yet, they're shedding thousands of jobs after their acquisitions of companies and their cost-cutting initiatives.

Halliburton and SLB having pretty significant layoffs is also a sign it's not all heavy on just the "green" initiatives. Other than contracting to drill CO2 sequestration wells or geothermal wells, those outfits don't seem to necessarily be playing in the "green energy" space. They're still WAY heavy as O&G service companies.
Posted by chauncey1
Member since May 2010
294 posts
Posted on 9/15/25 at 10:17 am to
-Several majors are moving domestic jobs to India to lower costs. It's surprising the administration hasn't looked at this more.

https://www.insightfultake.com/details/americas-oil-giants-are-quietly-moving-highend-engineering-jobs-to-india
-Operators are also implementing AI to eliminate jobs.

-Additionally, $60 oil isn't the same as it was 5 years ago. Service costs have increased due to labor and inflation. Operators are compensating by increasing efficiency and longer laterals, but returns on a lateral/ft basis aren't the same (generalized statement). It's important to recognize that Tier 1 acreage is being depleted, and companies will eventually face inventory constraints. Easing regulations incentivizes operators in certain circumstances, but it does not compensate for meager returns.

Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
22084 posts
Posted on 9/15/25 at 10:21 am to
I retired from this industry. It is an industry searching for finite resources. At some point it will turn into a harvesting industry. In the US it is turning into a harvesting industry.
Posted by tigerdup07
Member since Dec 2007
22228 posts
Posted on 9/15/25 at 10:24 am to
it's the same as last time he was in office. it was the worst turn in the drilling industry ever. we had so many layoffs.

you can't promote both lower energy costs and drill baby drill. the two are total opposites.

Posted by boogiewoogie1978
Little Rock
Member since Aug 2012
19193 posts
Posted on 9/15/25 at 10:27 am to
More profit. And they wonder why people hate them.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
170183 posts
Posted on 9/15/25 at 10:30 am to
quote:

how many of these layoffs are in "green energy" that the majors have been abandoning or scaling back on due to the realization that "green energy" isn't what its cracked up to be?

Probably not that many since a lot of the green energy projects still in development are tied to IRA funding
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
170183 posts
Posted on 9/15/25 at 10:33 am to
quote:


it's the same as last time he was in office. it was the worst turn in the drilling industry ever. we had so many layoffs.

you can't promote both lower energy costs and drill baby drill. the two are total opposites.

And oil prices are subject to the decisions of OPEC nations as well

Drill baby drill is one of the dumbest chants ever
Posted by Techdave
Laffy
Member since Apr 2014
212 posts
Posted on 9/15/25 at 10:39 am to
I'm an engineer at an O & G equipment manufacturer. We design casing/tubular running equipment that reduces the number of personnel needed on the rig for casing and greatly increases efficiency.

We have more orders than we can produce. Efficiency is the name of the game right now.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram