- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Rate Austin’s $200k new logo
Posted on 9/5/25 at 1:24 pm
Posted on 9/5/25 at 1:24 pm
Part of the city of Austin’s $1.1M rebranding project. Talk about grift…
New logo:
Old logo:
LINK
New logo:
Old logo:
quote:
The whole total project cost is an estimated $1,117,558 and is a part of the Austin Strategic 2023 Plan approved back in 2018. Here’s the breakdown of how that money is being spent:
Back in 2018, city council approved establishing a “consistent and clear brand” as part of the city’s strategic plan to improve communication and engagement with communities, businesses, and employees, City of Austin Chief Communications Director Jessica King said during the press conference.
“We are taking a fiscally responsible approach to transition to a new brand,” King said. “We do not expect departments to run out and buy everything with the new brand.”
According to King, city council awarded a contract to two firms to work on the design. Those were TKO, an Austin-based advertising agency, and Pentagram, the world’s largest independent design consultancy, which has an Austin office and team.
The contract was about $564,000, which King said the “vast majority of that” went to outreach engagement. The design element itself cost about $200,000.
LINK
This post was edited on 9/5/25 at 1:25 pm
Posted on 9/5/25 at 1:26 pm to yaboidarrell
Austin: it was cooler 10 years ago
Posted on 9/5/25 at 1:27 pm to yaboidarrell
how does that label distinguish it as a city? if I saw that logo the last thing I would think is it is associated with a city.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 1:27 pm to yaboidarrell
quote:
The contract was about $564,000, which King said the “vast majority of that” went to outreach engagement.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 1:27 pm to yaboidarrell
The shite the govt spends money on; my mind will never comprehend.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 1:29 pm to yaboidarrell
Looks like a waste management logo…which I guess sort of checks out.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 1:31 pm to yaboidarrell
Might be an unpopular take but you could style some dope throwback type unis off this and those colors in baseball or basketball
Paying that much for a city logo though is of course fricking moronic
Paying that much for a city logo though is of course fricking moronic
Posted on 9/5/25 at 1:31 pm to yaboidarrell
San Antonio should extend the green line at the top a little to make it look more like an S and make it their new logo.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 1:31 pm to yaboidarrell
Our company paid $16,000 to change our logo about 12 years ago.
It's a simple oak leaf that anyone could've grabbed off the internet in 5 seconds.
Hell, probably ClipArt.
It's a simple oak leaf that anyone could've grabbed off the internet in 5 seconds.
Hell, probably ClipArt.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 1:32 pm to yaboidarrell
The brand looks stupid IMO, but looking at it more closely, I'm assuming that the green represents the hill country and the blue represents the Colorado River.
$200K sounds like a lot but I'm sure that were a number of people working, researching, and dozens of meetings for months to come up with something that looks like it would take 5 minutes.
Some companies spend millions to just change some small aspect of their logo in the end.
$200K sounds like a lot but I'm sure that were a number of people working, researching, and dozens of meetings for months to come up with something that looks like it would take 5 minutes.
Some companies spend millions to just change some small aspect of their logo in the end.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 1:32 pm to yaboidarrell
Keep Austin Boring I guess
Posted on 9/5/25 at 1:34 pm to yaboidarrell
Did they move the city to Colorado? Quebec?
Posted on 9/5/25 at 1:34 pm to yaboidarrell
At least it’s no rainbow.
This post was edited on 9/5/25 at 2:24 pm
Posted on 9/5/25 at 1:34 pm to yaboidarrell
$200,000 for an AI logo that the student intern could have done.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 1:35 pm to PhilipMarlowe
quote:
Looks like a waste management logo…which I guess sort of checks out.
It’s definitely more corporate than general public branding.
“Come to Austin where you can sync up and network!”
Posted on 9/5/25 at 1:35 pm to yaboidarrell
The old label was 100 times better than the new one. Shame on them for changing it.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 1:35 pm to atxfan
quote:
I'm assuming that the green represents the hill country and the blue represents the Colorado River.
I thought the green represented the California environmental transplants and the blue represented how they will vote for the foreseeable future.
Posted on 9/5/25 at 1:41 pm to yaboidarrell
I don’t really care about city logos unless Baton Rouge adopts this as theirs


Popular
Back to top


40










