Started By
Message

Kavanaugh signals Supreme Court will soon decide constitutionality of banning AR-15s

Posted on 6/2/25 at 9:59 am
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
78626 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 9:59 am
The Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up a case that involves whether possessing AR-15’s is protected by the Second Amendment, but the court’s conservatives are signaling they soon will.

Only three justices — Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch — voted to hear a challenge to Maryland’s ban on possessing AR-15s, barely falling short of the four votes required to take up a case.

But Justice Brett Kavanaugh sent a strong signal that he will provide that crucial fourth vote in a future case once the issue percolates more in the lower courts.

“In my view, this Court should and presumably will address the AR–15 issue soon, in the next Term or two,” Kavanaugh wrote in a three-page written statement.

Kavanaugh, President Trump’s second appointee to the court, called Maryland’s law “questionable.” But he stressed the issue is currently being considered by several appeals courts that are weighing other states’ bans.

The trio of other conservative justices said they would’ve taken up the issue now.

“I would not wait to decide whether the government can ban the most popular rifle in America. That question is of critical importance to tens of millions of law-abiding AR–15 owners throughout the country. We have avoided deciding it for a full decade,” Thomas wrote in a solo, written dissent.

He added, “I doubt we would sit idly by if lower courts were to so subvert our precedents involving any other constitutional right.” LINK
Posted by OysterPoBoy
City of St. George
Member since Jul 2013
40900 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 10:01 am to
quote:

Supreme Court will soon decide constitutionality of banning AR-15s


Congress shall not.


Next.
Posted by momentoftruth87
Your mom
Member since Oct 2013
85662 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 10:03 am to
They’re about to FAFO
Posted by llfshoals
Member since Nov 2010
19321 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 10:04 am to
I always thought “shall not be infringed” was as clear as it gets.
Posted by CAD703X
Liberty Island
Member since Jul 2008
87580 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 10:13 am to
quote:

ake up a case that involves whether possessing AR-15’s is protected by the Second Amendment


black rifle bad


BLACK RIFLE BAD
Posted by BeefSupreme
Metairie
Member since Sep 2016
389 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 10:19 am to
We may affirm your God-Given Right, in the next term or two.
FFS
Posted by UnclePat76
McHenry County Illinois
Member since Sep 2004
3359 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 10:28 am to
Assault rifles are bad! Even though they only accounted for 3% of murders in Illinois and most of them were self inflicted-suicides. But let’s ban them because it’s the cool thing to do!
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
25490 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 10:29 am to
I thought they had already set precedent that the AR was "commonly owned" or some similar language. I guess lower courts are ignoring it?
Posted by coolpapaboze
Parts Unknown
Member since Dec 2006
18466 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 10:30 am to
I don't have a lot of confidence that this court will do the right thing.
Posted by Load Toad
Haughton, LA
Member since Aug 2008
2336 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 10:31 am to
I can get one for a nice price for Fathers day on base. I might have to buy one.
Posted by HailToTheChiz
Back in Auburn
Member since Aug 2010
52140 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 10:32 am to
Glorified constitutional crisis would be them saying it's banned and then trying to enforce it
Posted by UnclePat76
McHenry County Illinois
Member since Sep 2004
3359 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 10:33 am to
Right now it’s a mess. The Supreme Court told the Illinois NRA to take a hike in their appeal a few months ago. These conservative SC judges are useless.
Posted by SPEEDY
2005 Tiger Smack Poster of the Year
Member since Dec 2003
85547 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 10:35 am to
quote:

“I would not wait to decide whether the government can ban the most popular rifle in America. That question is of critical importance to tens of millions of law-abiding AR–15 owners throughout the country. We have avoided deciding it for a full decade,” Thomas wrote in a solo, written dissent.

He added, “I doubt we would sit idly by if lower courts were to so subvert our precedents involving any other constitutional right.”


Gone be such a huge loss when Justice Thomas is gone. Irreplaceable
This post was edited on 6/2/25 at 10:39 am
Posted by sidewalkside
rent free in yo head
Member since Sep 2021
3525 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 10:37 am to
quote:

Supreme Court will soon decide constitutionality of banning AR-15s
better fricking not.
This post was edited on 6/2/25 at 10:38 am
Posted by The Baker
This is fine.
Member since Dec 2011
17278 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 10:39 am to
I was getting lectured by a canadian uber driver last year and he was stunned when I told him that he should be much more worried about handguns out on the street than AR-15s.
This post was edited on 6/2/25 at 10:39 am
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
33659 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 10:40 am to
quote:

I always thought “shall not be infringed” was as clear as it gets.

The text of the first amendment is equally restrictive, and yet there are exceptions to everything listed in the first. Why would the second be any different?
Posted by wareaglepete
Lumon Industries
Member since Dec 2012
14564 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 10:46 am to
Wrong precedent doesn’t make it right.
Posted by Laugh More
Member since Jan 2022
2697 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 10:49 am to
Always sucks when you buy something new and lose it the very next day...
Posted by TideHater
Orange Beach AL
Member since May 2007
19726 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 10:54 am to
This is actually good news. I only own AR-16's. I rebranded all of mine.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
92659 posts
Posted on 6/2/25 at 10:56 am to
I smell a plan whereby they wait for Thomas and Alito to retire and have new, "conservatives" rewrite the 2nd Amendment for the "modern audience".

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram