- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Kavanaugh signals Supreme Court will soon decide constitutionality of banning AR-15s
Posted on 6/2/25 at 9:59 am
Posted on 6/2/25 at 9:59 am
The Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up a case that involves whether possessing AR-15’s is protected by the Second Amendment, but the court’s conservatives are signaling they soon will.
Only three justices — Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch — voted to hear a challenge to Maryland’s ban on possessing AR-15s, barely falling short of the four votes required to take up a case.
But Justice Brett Kavanaugh sent a strong signal that he will provide that crucial fourth vote in a future case once the issue percolates more in the lower courts.
“In my view, this Court should and presumably will address the AR–15 issue soon, in the next Term or two,” Kavanaugh wrote in a three-page written statement.
Kavanaugh, President Trump’s second appointee to the court, called Maryland’s law “questionable.” But he stressed the issue is currently being considered by several appeals courts that are weighing other states’ bans.
The trio of other conservative justices said they would’ve taken up the issue now.
“I would not wait to decide whether the government can ban the most popular rifle in America. That question is of critical importance to tens of millions of law-abiding AR–15 owners throughout the country. We have avoided deciding it for a full decade,” Thomas wrote in a solo, written dissent.
He added, “I doubt we would sit idly by if lower courts were to so subvert our precedents involving any other constitutional right.” LINK
Only three justices — Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch — voted to hear a challenge to Maryland’s ban on possessing AR-15s, barely falling short of the four votes required to take up a case.
But Justice Brett Kavanaugh sent a strong signal that he will provide that crucial fourth vote in a future case once the issue percolates more in the lower courts.
“In my view, this Court should and presumably will address the AR–15 issue soon, in the next Term or two,” Kavanaugh wrote in a three-page written statement.
Kavanaugh, President Trump’s second appointee to the court, called Maryland’s law “questionable.” But he stressed the issue is currently being considered by several appeals courts that are weighing other states’ bans.
The trio of other conservative justices said they would’ve taken up the issue now.
“I would not wait to decide whether the government can ban the most popular rifle in America. That question is of critical importance to tens of millions of law-abiding AR–15 owners throughout the country. We have avoided deciding it for a full decade,” Thomas wrote in a solo, written dissent.
He added, “I doubt we would sit idly by if lower courts were to so subvert our precedents involving any other constitutional right.” LINK
Posted on 6/2/25 at 10:01 am to Jbird
quote:
Supreme Court will soon decide constitutionality of banning AR-15s
Congress shall not.
Next.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 10:04 am to Jbird
I always thought “shall not be infringed” was as clear as it gets.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 10:13 am to Jbird
quote:
ake up a case that involves whether possessing AR-15’s is protected by the Second Amendment

black rifle bad
BLACK RIFLE BAD
Posted on 6/2/25 at 10:19 am to Jbird
We may affirm your God-Given Right, in the next term or two.
FFS
FFS
Posted on 6/2/25 at 10:28 am to Jbird
Assault rifles are bad! Even though they only accounted for 3% of murders in Illinois and most of them were self inflicted-suicides. But let’s ban them because it’s the cool thing to do!
Posted on 6/2/25 at 10:29 am to Jbird
I thought they had already set precedent that the AR was "commonly owned" or some similar language. I guess lower courts are ignoring it?
Posted on 6/2/25 at 10:30 am to Jbird
I don't have a lot of confidence that this court will do the right thing.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 10:31 am to Jbird
I can get one for a nice price for Fathers day on base. I might have to buy one.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 10:32 am to Jbird
Glorified constitutional crisis would be them saying it's banned and then trying to enforce it
Posted on 6/2/25 at 10:33 am to Flats
Right now it’s a mess. The Supreme Court told the Illinois NRA to take a hike in their appeal a few months ago. These conservative SC judges are useless.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 10:35 am to Jbird
quote:
“I would not wait to decide whether the government can ban the most popular rifle in America. That question is of critical importance to tens of millions of law-abiding AR–15 owners throughout the country. We have avoided deciding it for a full decade,” Thomas wrote in a solo, written dissent.
He added, “I doubt we would sit idly by if lower courts were to so subvert our precedents involving any other constitutional right.”
Gone be such a huge loss when Justice Thomas is gone. Irreplaceable
This post was edited on 6/2/25 at 10:39 am
Posted on 6/2/25 at 10:37 am to Jbird
quote:better fricking not.
Supreme Court will soon decide constitutionality of banning AR-15s
This post was edited on 6/2/25 at 10:38 am
Posted on 6/2/25 at 10:39 am to Jbird
I was getting lectured by a canadian uber driver last year and he was stunned when I told him that he should be much more worried about handguns out on the street than AR-15s.
This post was edited on 6/2/25 at 10:39 am
Posted on 6/2/25 at 10:40 am to llfshoals
quote:
I always thought “shall not be infringed” was as clear as it gets.
The text of the first amendment is equally restrictive, and yet there are exceptions to everything listed in the first. Why would the second be any different?
Posted on 6/2/25 at 10:46 am to Indefatigable
Wrong precedent doesn’t make it right.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 10:49 am to Load Toad
Always sucks when you buy something new and lose it the very next day...
Posted on 6/2/25 at 10:54 am to Jbird
This is actually good news. I only own AR-16's. I rebranded all of mine.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 10:56 am to Jbird
I smell a plan whereby they wait for Thomas and Alito to retire and have new, "conservatives" rewrite the 2nd Amendment for the "modern audience".


Popular
Back to top
