- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kavanaugh signals Supreme Court will soon decide constitutionality of banning AR-15s
Posted on 6/2/25 at 10:56 pm to Froman
Posted on 6/2/25 at 10:56 pm to Froman
quote:
There’s also nothing in the second amendment that says you have a right to own an AR-15. You have a right to bear arms. The government decides which arms are acceptable for citizens to own. If the same gun is showing up in mass shootings, then it’s within their right to ban it. Also, for a group that supports TACO wiping his arse with the constitution, y’all are really particular on this one.
How ignorant of you.
0
Posted on 6/2/25 at 11:04 pm to troyt37
quote:
All three, actually.
You have yet to make a legal or constitutional case. So I can only conclude that your stance is entirely political.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 11:22 pm to Froman
quote:
It’s a completely unnecessary gun for a civilian to own.
How about these? Are these OK for people to own?
What about this?
Or this?
Do you know the difference?
Posted on 6/2/25 at 11:28 pm to Froman
quote:
It’s a completely unnecessary gun for a civilian to own
bullshite, we aren't making it easier for your people to rob us
Posted on 6/2/25 at 11:29 pm to SPEEDY
quote:
Gone be such a huge loss when Justice Thomas is gone. Irreplaceable
One of our countries greatest men.
Posted on 6/2/25 at 11:32 pm to Froman
quote:
I fully support the second amendment
quote:
I don’t care if they get banned.
quote:
It’s a completely unnecessary gun for a civilian to own
So you don’t fully support the second amendment
Posted on 6/3/25 at 12:50 am to dnm3305
quote:
dnm3305
Did you mean to reply like that to me? Beause you seem to not understand what my post was at all…
I agree with you on 2nd amendment issues, but you’ve either got to improve your posting and replying skills or your reading comprehension.
Posted on 6/3/25 at 12:54 am to SG_Geaux
quote:
Do you know the difference?
Hey I’ve got two of the three!
Er… well had them until that damn boating accident…
Posted on 6/3/25 at 4:07 am to Jbird
I already have plans to not support this potential ban.
This post was edited on 6/3/25 at 4:08 am
Posted on 6/3/25 at 6:21 am to Jbird
Once again, Thomas on point.
Posted on 6/3/25 at 6:25 am to Froman
quote:
I fully support the second amendment but after so many incidents with these guns, I don’t care if they get banned.
what an "oxy-moronic" statement ever mentioned on TD.
imagine telling the founding fathers this.
Posted on 6/3/25 at 7:48 am to Indefatigable
quote:
You have yet to make a legal or constitutional case. So I can only conclude that your stance is entirely political.
Legally, all gun laws are unconstitutional. Constitutionally, all gun laws are by definition infringements, and therefore repugnant to the Constitution. Politically, corrupt politicians appoint and cover corrupt judges who conspire to violate the rights ensured by the Constitution. They should all be tried and hung for sedition, but at the very least should not be allowed to hold any kind of public office.
Posted on 6/3/25 at 7:52 am to Indefatigable
quote:
“Shall make no law” and “shall not” are completely identical in textual prohibition.
Not at all. There is no opening in the second amendment, there is no party being restricted from doing anything, it’s an absolute.
Seriously, do you need this explained to you?
Page 6 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News