Started By
Message

For Those Curious What DOGE Has Been Up To - Cleaning Up 12.3M+ Folks on SS Aged 120+

Posted on 5/23/25 at 12:57 pm
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
70537 posts
Posted on 5/23/25 at 12:57 pm



quote:

After 11 weeks, @SocialSecurity has finished this major cleanup initiative: ~12.3M individuals aged 120+ have now been marked as deceased.

Some complex cases remain, such as individuals with 2+ different birth dates on file. These will be investigated in a follow-up effort.


INB4 windowlickers screech incoherently, "nuh-UHHHHHHHHHH!"
This post was edited on 5/23/25 at 12:59 pm
Posted by I20goon
about 7mi down a dirt road
Member since Aug 2013
17668 posts
Posted on 5/23/25 at 1:06 pm to
quote:

INB4 windowlickers screech incoherently, "nuh-UHHHHHHHHHH!"
does said window have peanut butter on it? If so, count me in.

I'm a sucker for peanut butter.
------------------------------------------
Any idea the total amount $-wise?
Any clawbacks? (I'm assuming not yet... but coming)


Reminder: they fought like hell in both district courts, hearings, AND in the press to stop DOGE from even seeing this info, much less the level of access required to do an audit. I won't be surprised at all to find out the +120 yr olds and double-numbers are indeed campaign donors through ActBlue.
Posted by TxWadingFool
Middle Coast
Member since Sep 2014
5102 posts
Posted on 5/23/25 at 1:20 pm to
Why doesn't it say if any of those were actually collecting payments? If they were it seems it would be pretty easy to track down who was collecting the money. Doge doesn't seem shy from appointing a dollar amount to the fraud they find but nothing about an amount here, seems weird.
Posted by SlayTime
Member since Jan 2025
1648 posts
Posted on 5/23/25 at 1:27 pm to
Why does Elon hate people over 120?
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
121479 posts
Posted on 5/23/25 at 1:30 pm to
quote:

Why does Elon hate people over 120?


Dead people over 120 years old are people too.
Posted by BigBinBR
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2023
7517 posts
Posted on 5/23/25 at 1:31 pm to
quote:

Why doesn't it say if any of those were actually collecting payments?


This is one sides argument. They are saying that they aren't collecting payments. But they never answer why are they so upset that all of these are getting cleaned up. If they aren't collecting benefits then this is just simple clerical work. No need for them to be so upset.
Posted by TechBullDawg
Member since May 2014
1585 posts
Posted on 5/23/25 at 1:31 pm to
So, removes those numbers from being used to vote. Huh
Posted by I20goon
about 7mi down a dirt road
Member since Aug 2013
17668 posts
Posted on 5/23/25 at 1:32 pm to
quote:


Why does Elon hate people over 120?
that would make him a 'rageist' wouldn't it?

[ageist + racist]

Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
35566 posts
Posted on 5/23/25 at 1:34 pm to
You can build a wall across the northern border with that cash.

Might need it.
This post was edited on 5/23/25 at 2:27 pm
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
25974 posts
Posted on 5/23/25 at 1:36 pm to
quote:

Dead people over 120 years old are people too.



Well they definitely vote in some districts.
Posted by dewster
Chicago
Member since Aug 2006
25974 posts
Posted on 5/23/25 at 1:37 pm to
quote:

So, removes those numbers from being used to vote. Huh



Need to go a step beyond. We are correcting the issue now, but we need a system in place to prevent it from happening again.

We all pay into Social Security. It's solvency depends on there not being fraud; and no system in place to sunset a social security number is clearly a vulnerability that opens the door for fraud.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
121479 posts
Posted on 5/23/25 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

Well they definitely vote in some districts.
Disenfranchising voters!
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
16971 posts
Posted on 5/23/25 at 1:38 pm to
quote:

This is one sides argument. They are saying that they aren't collecting payments. But they never answer why are they so upset that all of these are getting cleaned up. If they aren't collecting benefits then this is just simple clerical work. No need for them to be so up

Voter fraud.
Posted by DUKE87
Covington, LA
Member since May 2021
1236 posts
Posted on 5/23/25 at 1:40 pm to
You believed a doge twitter account?

So, you’re gullible and naive?

Posted by statman34
Member since Feb 2011
3279 posts
Posted on 5/23/25 at 1:43 pm to
when the dems talk about republicans cheating, they are effectively talking about removing the dead people that the dems were using to vote, thus cheating them out of cheating. No wonder they are pissed.
Posted by riccoar
Arkansas
Member since Mar 2006
3978 posts
Posted on 5/23/25 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

So, removes those numbers from being used to vote. Huh


Bingo. It's why Trump highlighted it. He knows everything they did in 2020.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
70537 posts
Posted on 5/23/25 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

You believed a doge twitter account?

THE DOGE Twitter account, jizz rag.

You're welcome to cross-reference it with the DOGE.gov website.
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
70537 posts
Posted on 5/23/25 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

Why doesn't it say if any of those were actually collecting payments? If they were it seems it would be pretty easy to track down who was collecting the money. Doge doesn't seem shy from appointing a dollar amount to the fraud they find but nothing about an amount here, seems weird.

The forensic accounting phase of the DOGE work will follow.
Posted by AGGIES
Member since Jul 2021
8544 posts
Posted on 5/23/25 at 1:49 pm to
Awesome database cleanup efforts!
I’m satisfied with that announcement…
Posted by Tigers0918
Member since Feb 2020
1457 posts
Posted on 5/23/25 at 1:50 pm to
it has never been about being upset about things getting cleaned up. It is about how it is getting done.

As simple as I can put this, I don't trust Musk and some random 21 year old kids to have access to and modify government databases with little to no oversight.

Trump could have told the SS office they have 6 months or whatever timeframe to clean up files, delete dead people, and put together a report to give directly to him. That would have been fine.

At the end of the day, there are so many things MAGA is fine with Trump doing, but would be near a revolt if any Democrat did the same thing.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram