- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
RealClearPolitics: Trial Lawyers will ruin Louisiana's Energy Industry
Posted on 5/15/25 at 9:18 am
Posted on 5/15/25 at 9:18 am
From RealClear Energy:
Real Clear Energy website
quote:
In an April verdict, a jury in Louisiana's 25th Judicial District ruled Chevron must pay the government of Plaquemines Parish $745 million in recompense for environmental damage relating to oil and natural gas activities conducted by Texaco before Chevron acquired it in 2001.
The Plaquemines case is the first in a flood of litigation that threatens to swamp the industry in a state critical to the national energy agenda. Since 2010, Louisiana’s liquefied natural gas (LNG) industry has boomed; energy now provides about 10 percent of jobs in the state and generates about 20 percent of its gross product. Louisiana ranks second only to Texas in energy exports by dollar value and it serves as the main launching pad for the LNG exports that are liberating American allies in Europe and Asia from dependence on hostile regimes.
Yet, beyond Plaquemines, more than 40 similar lawsuits are pending, filed by parishes seeking to hold oil and gas companies financially responsible for decades of coastal land loss. The verdict against Chevron sets a dangerous precedent that could extract billions from an industry essential to America's global economic strategy....
The Plaquemines case—supported by Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry—was argued by one of the governor’s largest donors, serial plaintiff attorney John Carmouche. Rather than a populist uprising, the lawsuits represent the familiar pattern of politically connected insiders exploiting grievances, real or not.
Indeed, problems with the Plaquemines verdict go beyond the personnel involved in the lawsuit. The verdict divided the damages into $160 million for contaminating waters, $10 million for abandoning equipment, and $575 million for causing coastal erosion. Even if the contamination and equipment claims have merit, the whopping erosion claim lacks causal support.
Plaquemines Parish’s estuarial geography has, by its nature, always been in flux. Land in the far southeastern corner of the state lies at perilously low elevations and has always been at the mercy of the Mississippi River’s seasonal flows. In recent decades land loss has indeed become a real issue for the parish’s 25,000 residents and those across the state’s coastal reaches. Famously, Louisiana loses about a football-field’s worth of land every hour. But oil and gas activity is not the culprit.
The primary driver of coastal erosion has been Louisiana’s decision—supported by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers—to channel the Mississippi River directly to the Gulf, rather than permit its usual variation. Historically, annual river floods deposited millions of tons of sediment in Plaquemines and other parishes that bolstered dry land. Channeling the river and building levees to prevent catastrophic flooding upstream in cities like New Orleans and Baton Rouge cut off that replenishment. This feat of geoengineering has succeeded in protecting millions of Louisianans from harm and securing billions of dollars in economic activity, but at the predictable cost of sacrificing Louisiana’s southeastern corner to gradual land loss....
Utilitarian river management decisions and natural vulnerability are what ail Plaquemines and other coastal parishes. Governor Landry and his trial lawyer allies are wringing dry the state’s standout sector on false environmental pretenses. The Plaquemines Parish verdict and the dozens of looming cases behind it jeopardize the American energy renaissance by levying spurious, retroactive penalties on the very companies driving national growth. Disguised as environmental justice, this opportunistic grab by political insiders undermines both Louisiana’s energy sector and genuine climate resilience.
Real Clear Energy website
This post was edited on 5/15/25 at 9:23 am
Posted on 5/15/25 at 9:23 am to prplhze2000
Sorry, Landry and his cronies can’t hear you from Gordon’s private jet!
Posted on 5/15/25 at 9:25 am to prplhze2000
Follow the money. Where is the money going? Which lawyers are getting paid?
Politicians were fine with the marsh destruction when they were getting tax revenues.
Politicians were fine with the marsh destruction when they were getting tax revenues.
Posted on 5/15/25 at 9:28 am to prplhze2000
quote:
Trial Lawyers will ruin Louisiana's Energy Industry
But they make up for it by all the good work they do to keep car insurance affordable.
Posted on 5/15/25 at 9:35 am to prplhze2000
quote:$745 million for environmental damage to Plaquemines Parish, the same frickers that fight tooth and nail against every coastal restoration project.
must pay the government of Plaquemines Parish $745 million in recompense for environmental damage relating to oil and natural gas activities
Posted on 5/15/25 at 9:36 am to Epaminondas
quote:
$745 million for environmental damage to Plaquemines Parish, the same frickers that fight tooth and nail against every coastal restoration project.
sounds like a failure to mitigate to me...
Posted on 5/15/25 at 9:43 am to TIGERHOLD
Gordon is not as sophisticated as Carmouche and Marcello. Gordon buys football players for LSU. John Carmouche buys politicians. Also, Gordon is nowhere near the prick John Carmouche is.
Posted on 5/15/25 at 10:06 am to KiwiHead
quote:
Gordon is not as sophisticated as Carmouche and Marcello. Gordon buys football players for LSU. John Carmouche buys politicians. Also, Gordon is nowhere near the prick John Carmouche is.
It’s all so depressing. Attorneys have ruined this State. We can’t govern ourselves.
Posted on 5/15/25 at 10:11 am to prplhze2000
Has the Governor’s office issued any sort of statement, support/against/neutral regarding the Chevron suit?
Seems the Governor is awfully quiet on this important issue, which is rare for him. He went on Fox News because of LSU basketball and the national anthem, which is much less important, one would think, than Chevron and other O&G companies being forced to pay up 3/4s of a billion dollars for doing things they were permitted to do over 50 years ago.
Seems the Governor is awfully quiet on this important issue, which is rare for him. He went on Fox News because of LSU basketball and the national anthem, which is much less important, one would think, than Chevron and other O&G companies being forced to pay up 3/4s of a billion dollars for doing things they were permitted to do over 50 years ago.
Posted on 5/15/25 at 10:23 am to prplhze2000
Sounds like more of a "Jurors will ruin Louisiana Energy Industry" type of issue....or "Energy companies tearing shite up" will ruin Louisiana Energy Industry. If it is really poor energy companies are being treated unfairly, why did a jury hit them so hard? Isn't the lawyer's fault. (Energy Companies have lawyers too. Tell the jury why the lawsuit is frivolous or bullshite.) I mean, the Energy industry is complaining because a jury found that they were wrong for doing what they did. Well...stop doing wrong shite. There are a lot of situations where the public good justifies damage to a few. Look at eminent domain laws relating to highways and all of that, where some people have their land taken for public necessities...yet they are compensated for it through methods set up in the law. If Energy Companies are tearing shite up, then they need to either stop tearing shite up, or explain why the end justifies the means, and figure out some way to compensate those whose shite they are tearing up, and put it into law. If not, then don't complain when a jury lights you up.
And, if the companies were permitted to do what they were doing 50 years ago, then that is a strong argument to be made to the jury. Also, the appellate court can look at the issue and reverse it if the jury was wrong. (As can the Supreme Court.) Appellate Court can also reduce quantum if it is out of proportion to the damage caused.
And, if the companies were permitted to do what they were doing 50 years ago, then that is a strong argument to be made to the jury. Also, the appellate court can look at the issue and reverse it if the jury was wrong. (As can the Supreme Court.) Appellate Court can also reduce quantum if it is out of proportion to the damage caused.
This post was edited on 5/15/25 at 10:30 am
Posted on 5/15/25 at 10:59 am to prplhze2000
quote:
The Plaquemines case—supported by Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry—was argued by one of the governor’s largest donors, serial plaintiff attorney John Carmouche
I can't determine which of these turds I despise more.
Probably Landry-at least Carmouche doesn't try to hide who he is!
Posted on 5/15/25 at 11:09 am to jrobic4
We have only ourselves to blame. The populace loves to sue
Posted on 5/15/25 at 11:15 am to prplhze2000
Plaintiff attorneys are killing this state
We need reform to our liability legal environment.
The plaintiff attorneys have already killed the insurance environment and they’ll kill energy and any other industries that they can get their hooks into.
We have to rein them in.
We need reform to our liability legal environment.
The plaintiff attorneys have already killed the insurance environment and they’ll kill energy and any other industries that they can get their hooks into.
We have to rein them in.
Posted on 5/15/25 at 11:33 am to rumproast
quote:Weren't they allowed to do those things by the state at the time Mr. Cap-toe Oxford licker?
Tell the jury why the lawsuit is frivolous or bullshite.) I mean, the Energy industry is complaining because a jury found that they were wrong for doing what they did.
Posted on 5/15/25 at 11:50 am to jrobic4
quote:
I can't determine which of these turds I despise more.
One has always tried to make himself out to be the O&G industry’s biggest ally and advocate when running for office. One has never tried to portray himself as an ally of the industry.
Posted on 5/15/25 at 12:11 pm to KiwiHead
quote:
…Carmouche buys politicians…
Major league firm in Democratic politics. They raised the money, gathered the dirt, and spent a ton on political advertising against David Vitter to air his dirty laundry and get JB Edwards elected governor of your fair state. They would have done the same to Landry, but they cut this deal.
Posted on 5/15/25 at 12:27 pm to rumproast
quote:
If it is really poor energy companies are being treated unfairly, why did a jury hit them so hard?
So you're opinions on lawsuits in this state is based on a jury verdict?

quote:
(Energy Companies have lawyers too. Tell the jury why the lawsuit is frivolous or bullshite.) I mean, the Energy industry is complaining because a jury found that they were wrong for doing what they did. Well...stop doing wrong shite.
Right, because no person would ever side against an entity that is backed by a corporation.

How's your insurance rates?
This post was edited on 5/15/25 at 12:31 pm
Posted on 5/15/25 at 12:34 pm to prplhze2000
Trump is going to have to address this as a National Security issue, because it is. It’s bad enough that the profiteer lawyers have ruined the Insurance Industry in a get rich quick *injury* scam. Cannot afford this in the Energy sector as it will spread like Covid across the Nation.
Posted on 5/15/25 at 1:04 pm to prplhze2000
At some point you have to consider if oil companies are still located in Louisiana past the extreme bare minimum then its their fault. Louisiana legal system is a joke and meant to enrich lawyers. If I were any oil company, La would be off limits to even my truckers. Drive around it.
Posted on 5/15/25 at 1:04 pm to prplhze2000
Is this the latest cicrle jerk thread by the NeverTrumpers?
Its hard to keep up
Youre posting a link to an OpEd written by this guy
I'm sure his time advocating for Taiwan and NYC have given him a unique insight into La politics
Which one of you figs reached out to him to write this?
Its hard to keep up
Youre posting a link to an OpEd written by this guy
quote:
Jordan McGillis is economics editor of the Manhattan Institute's City Journal and an adjunct fellow at the Global Taiwan Institute
I'm sure his time advocating for Taiwan and NYC have given him a unique insight into La politics
Which one of you figs reached out to him to write this?
Popular
Back to top
